Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in the Evaluation of Complex Cystic and Solid Breast Masses-A Feasibility Study

被引:1
作者
Shi, Haiyuan [1 ]
Chee, Charlyn Chai Hoon [2 ]
Seng, Angela Peck Ying [2 ]
Koh, Xuan Han [3 ]
Teoh, Wey Chyi [1 ]
Mahmood, Rameysh Danovani [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Changi Gen Hosp, Dept Radiol, Singapore, Singapore
[2] Changi Gen Hosp, Dept Radiog, Singapore, Singapore
[3] Changi Gen Hosp, Dept Hlth Serv Res, Singapore, Singapore
[4] Specialist Camden Med, Singapore, Singapore
关键词
complex cystic and solid breast masses; complex breast cysts; contrast-enhanced ultrasound; breast imaging; TUMOR VASCULARITY; DOPPLER; SONOGRAPHY; US;
D O I
10.1093/jbi/wbae007
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective Complex cystic and solid breast mass (CCSBM) is a radiological diagnosis based on grayscale B-mode sonographic features. Because of potential for malignancy, biopsy is typically recommended. We examined the feasibility of contrast-enhanced US (CEUS) as a tool to identify benign CCSBMs.Methods This Institutional Review Board-approved prospective observational study performed targeted CEUS of 14 CCSBMs that were subsequently biopsied. CEUS images were independently reviewed by two readers blinded to other sonographic features, noting presence or absence of enhancement and time to perceived optimal enhancement. Interobserver agreement for presence or absence of enhancement was analyzed using Cohen's kappa coefficient. From retrospective review of initial diagnostic US examinations, descriptive CCSBM sizes, subtypes, and Doppler information were recorded. Histopathologies were categorized as benign, benign with upgrade potential (BWUP), and malignant. Measures of diagnostic accuracy and 95% CIs were calculated for CEUS enhancement.Results Of 14 CCSBMs, 12 were nonmalignant (9 benign, 3 BWUP) and 2 were malignant. There was perfect interobserver agreement (Cohen's kappa 1.00) between the 2 readers for CEUS enhancement. CEUS was 100% sensitive, 25% specific, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.625 (95% CI, 0.50-0.75) in differentiating nonmalignant from malignant lesions. It was 100% sensitive, 33.3% specific, with an AUROC of 0.667 (95% CI, 0.50-0.85) in differentiating benign from surgically significant (BWUP and malignant) CCSBMs.Conclusion This small feasibility study highlighted the potential of CEUS as a safe noninvasive tool to identify the proportion of CCSBMs that are benign and can avoid tissue biopsy.
引用
收藏
页码:149 / 156
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Hypervascular Liver Masses on Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound: The Importance of Washout
    Bhayana, Deepak
    Kim, Tae Kyoung
    Jang, Hyun-Jung
    Burns, Peter N.
    Wilson, Stephanie R.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2010, 194 (04) : 977 - 983
  • [32] A multicenter study of a contrast-enhanced ultrasound diagnostic classification of breast lesions
    Tang, Lina
    Chen, Yijie
    Du, Zhongshi
    Zhong, Zhaoming
    Chen, Qin
    Yang, Lichun
    Shen, Ruoxia
    Cheng, Yan
    Zhang, Zizhen
    Han, Ehui
    Lv, Zhihong
    Yuan, Lijun
    Yang, Yong
    Cheng, Yinrong
    Yang, Lei
    Wang, Shengli
    Bai, Baoyan
    Luo, Jun
    CANCER MANAGEMENT AND RESEARCH, 2019, 11 : 2163 - 2170
  • [33] Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound for the Evaluation of Renal Transplants
    Kazmierski, Brittany J.
    Sharbidre, Kedar G.
    Robbin, Michelle L.
    Grant, Edward G.
    JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE, 2020, 39 (12) : 2457 - 2468
  • [34] Application of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the diagnosis of solid pancreatic lesions-A comparison of conventional ultrasound and contrast-enhanced CT
    Fan, Zhihui
    Li, Ying
    Yan, Kun
    Wu, Wei
    Yin, Shanshan
    Yang, Wei
    Xing, Baocai
    Li, Xiaoting
    Zhang, Xiaopeng
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2013, 82 (09) : 1385 - 1390
  • [35] Added value of intravenous contrast-enhanced ultrasound for characterization of cystic pancreatic masses: a prospective study on 37 patients
    Vasile, Tudor Andrei
    Socaciu, Mihai
    Iuga, Roxana Stan
    Seicean, Andrada
    Iancu, Cornel
    al Hajjar, Nadim
    Zaharie, Toader
    Badea, Radu
    MEDICAL ULTRASONOGRAPHY, 2012, 14 (02) : 108 - 114
  • [36] RENAL MASSES: EVALUATION WITH CONTRAST-ENHANCED ULTRASOUND, WITH A SPECIAL FOCUS ON THE PSEUDOCAPSULE SIGN
    Dai, Wen-Bin
    Yu, Bo
    Diao, Xue-Hong
    Cao, Hongli
    Chen, Lin
    Chen, Yue
    Zhan, Jia
    ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2019, 45 (08) : 1924 - 1932
  • [37] Diagnostic Value of Qualitative and Quantitative Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound for Pathological Subtypes of Small Solid Renal Masses
    He, Mengna
    Gao, Qiong
    Xiang, Jianjian
    Mao, Qiqi
    Jiang, Tian'an
    JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE, 2023, 42 (08) : 1663 - 1673
  • [38] Renal complex cysts in adults: contrast-enhanced ultrasound
    Nicolau, Carlos
    Bunesch, Laura
    Sebastia, Carmen
    ABDOMINAL IMAGING, 2011, 36 (06): : 742 - 752
  • [39] Contrast-enhanced ultrasound manifestations of renal masses undetectable on conventional ultrasound
    Tao, Lingling
    Fan, Jinfang
    Zhan, Weiwei
    Li, Weiwei
    Lu, Jian
    Yang, Nanan
    Ma, Binbin
    Zhou, Wei
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2022, 12
  • [40] USE OF CONTRAST-ENHANCED ULTRASOUND IN THE ASSESSMENT OF UTERINE FIBROIDS: A FEASIBILITY STUDY
    Stoelinga, Barbara
    Dooper, Anniek M. C.
    Juffermans, Lynda J. M.
    Postema, ArnoudW.
    Wijkstra, Hessel
    Brolmann, Hans A. M.
    Huirne, Judith A. F.
    ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2018, 44 (08) : 1901 - 1909