'If you have a question that doesn't work, then it's clearly going to upset candidates': what gives rise to errors in examination papers?

被引:0
作者
Constantinou, Filio [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cambridge, Cambridge Univ Press & Assessment, Res Div, Cambridge, England
[2] Univ Cambridge, Cambridge Univ Press & Assessment, Res Div, Shaftesbury Rd, Cambridge CB2 8EA, England
关键词
Assessment quality; human error; high-stakes assessment; test construction; validity; fairness;
D O I
10.1080/03054985.2024.2308548
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
This study investigated an under-researched source of measurement error in high-stakes examinations, namely mistakes in examination papers (e.g. multiple-choice questions containing more than one correct answer). Such mistakes (henceforth errors) are important, as they can undermine students' performance in the examination, while also eroding public confidence in the examination system. In light of this, this study sought to understand what gives rise to such errors. To this end, it drew upon in-depth interviews with 36 assessment professionals with knowledge and experience of the examination paper construction process. Through illuminating the demands of the paper construction process and the characteristics of the people who are involved in it, this investigation identified a number of 'active' and 'latent' human failures that can lead to errors in examination papers. The article argues that, to minimise the risk of error in examination papers, efforts to 'adapt' people to the demands of the paper construction process should be carefully combined with efforts to adapt the paper construction process to people requirements. Apart from contributing new knowledge to the field, the study's findings have also practical implications: examination providers can use them to optimise their paper construction processes to enhance the quality of their assessment instruments.
引用
收藏
页码:357 / 377
页数:21
相关论文
共 37 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1989, Educational measurement
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2018, ETH GUID ED RES, V4th
  • [3] Baird J., 2022, OVERVIEW PERCEPTIONS
  • [4] Baird J.A., 2014, Predictability in the Irish Leaving Certificate - Oxford University Centre for Educational Assessment Report OUCEA/14/1
  • [5] Braun V., 2019, SAGE HDB QUALITATIVE, P843, DOI [DOI 10.1037/13620-004, DOI 10.1080/17439760.2016.1262613]
  • [6] Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis
    Braun, Virginia
    Clarke, Victoria
    [J]. QUALITATIVE RESEARCH IN SPORT EXERCISE AND HEALTH, 2019, 11 (04) : 589 - 597
  • [7] One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis?
    Braun, Virginia
    Clarke, Victoria
    [J]. QUALITATIVE RESEARCH IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 18 (03) : 328 - 352
  • [8] Significant human risk factors in aircraft maintenance technicians
    Chang, Yu-Hern
    Wang, Ying-Chun
    [J]. SAFETY SCIENCE, 2010, 48 (01) : 54 - 62
  • [9] How novel can examination questions really be? Exploring the boundaries of creativity in examination question writing
    Constantinou, Filio
    [J]. RESEARCH PAPERS IN EDUCATION, 2023, 38 (02) : 208 - 226
  • [10] Crooks T.J., 1996, ASSESS EDUC, V3, P265, DOI DOI 10.1080/0969594960030302