Magnetic flux leakage defect size estimation method based on physics-informed neural network

被引:2
作者
Xiong, Yi [1 ,2 ]
Liu, Shuai [1 ,2 ]
Hou, Litao [3 ]
Zhou, Taotao [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] China Univ Petr, Coll Safety & Ocean Engn, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Minist Emergency Management, Key Lab Oil & Gas Safety & Emergency Technol, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] PipeChina, Dushanzi Oil & Gas Branch, West Pipeline, Karamay, Peoples R China
来源
PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY A-MATHEMATICAL PHYSICAL AND ENGINEERING SCIENCES | 2024年 / 382卷 / 2264期
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
magnetic flux leakage; physics-informed neural network; magnetic dipole model; defect size; in-pipe inspection; TOP;
D O I
10.1098/rsta.2022.0387
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Magnetic flux leakage (MFL) is a magnetic method of non-destructive testing for in-pipe defect detection and sizing. Despite the fact that recent developments in machine learning have revolutionized disciplines like MFL defect size estimation, the most current methods for quantifying pipeline defects are primarily data-driven, which may violate the underlying physical knowledge. This paper proposes a physics-informed neural network-based method for MFL defect size estimation. The training process of neural network is guided by the MFL data and the physical constraints that is mathematically represented by the magnetic dipole model. We use synthetic MFL data produced by a virtual MFL testing of pipeline defects to validate the proposed method through a comparison to purely data-driven neural networks and support vector machines. The findings imply that the physics-informed strategy can both improve predictive accuracy and mitigate physical violations in MFL testing, providing us with a better knowledge of how neural networks perform in defect size estimation.This article is part of the theme issue 'Physics-informed machine learning and its structural integrity applications (Part 2)'.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   Most fatal oil & gas pipeline accidents through history: A lessons learned approach [J].
Biezma, M., V ;
Andres, M. A. ;
Agudo, D. ;
Briz, E. .
ENGINEERING FAILURE ANALYSIS, 2020, 110
[2]   A review of two types of non-destructive testing technique for pressure pipelines [J].
Cheng, Jingui ;
Xu, Lei ;
Li Chao .
INSIGHT, 2021, 63 (06) :326-333
[3]   Solenoid model for visualizing magnetic flux leakage testing of complex defects [J].
Cheng, Yuhua ;
Wang, Yonggang ;
Yu, Haichao ;
Zhang, Yangzhen ;
Zhang, Jie ;
Yang, Qinghui ;
Sheng, Hanmin ;
Bai, Libing .
NDT & E INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 100 :166-174
[4]   Designing and Investigating a Nondestructive Magnetic Flux Leakage Detection System for Quantitatively Identifying Wire Defects [J].
Ding, Dawei ;
Lu, Jialei ;
Xu, Fengyu .
IEEE SENSORS JOURNAL, 2022, 22 (21) :20360-20372
[5]   Multidirectional magneto-optical imaging system for weld defects inspection [J].
Gao, Xiangdong ;
Li, Yanfeng ;
Zhou, Xiaohu ;
Dai, Xinxin ;
Zhang, Yanxi ;
You, Deyong ;
Zhang, Nanfeng .
OPTICS AND LASERS IN ENGINEERING, 2020, 124 (124)
[6]   Magnetic flux leakage detection method by the arrays consisted of three-dimensional hall sensor for rail top surface cracks [J].
Gong, Wendong ;
Yang, Tao ;
Guo, Lantian .
FERROELECTRICS, 2022, 597 (01) :52-64
[7]   A magnetic shielding strategy for magnetic sensor in magnetic flux leakage testing [J].
Hao, Shuai ;
Shi, Pengpeng ;
Su, Sanqing ;
Liang, Tianshou .
JOURNAL OF MAGNETISM AND MAGNETIC MATERIALS, 2022, 563
[8]   Deep Learning for Magnetic Flux Leakage Detection and Evaluation of Oil & Gas Pipelines: A Review [J].
Huang, Songling ;
Peng, Lisha ;
Sun, Hongyu ;
Li, Shisong .
ENERGIES, 2023, 16 (03)
[9]   A Heuristic Algorithm for the Reconstruction and Extraction of Defect Shape Features in Magnetic Flux Leakage Testing [J].
John, Alimey Fred ;
Bai, Libing ;
Cheng, Yuhua ;
Yu, Haichao .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INSTRUMENTATION AND MEASUREMENT, 2020, 69 (11) :9062-9071
[10]   Estimation of Depth and Length of Defects From Magnetic Flux Leakage Measurements: Verification With Simulations, Experiments, and Pigging Data [J].
Kandroodi, Mojtaba Rostami ;
Araabi, Babak Nadjar ;
Bassiri, Maisam Mansoob ;
Ahmadabadi, Majid Nili .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MAGNETICS, 2017, 53 (03)