Hemodynamic differences caused by left atrial appendage modeling contours

被引:4
作者
Chen, Yanlu [1 ]
Xu, Buyun [2 ,3 ]
Cheng, Yuzhou [4 ]
Luo, Kun [1 ,4 ]
Fan, Jianren [1 ,4 ]
Xiang, Meixiang [2 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Univ, State Key Lab Clean Energy Utilizat, Hangzhou 310027, Peoples R China
[2] Zhejiang Univ, Affiliated Hosp 2, Dept Cardiol, Sch Med, Hangzhou 310009, Peoples R China
[3] Zhejiang Univ, Shaoxing Peoples Hosp, Shaoxing Hosp, Shaoxing 312000, Peoples R China
[4] Zhejiang Univ, Shanghai Inst Adv Study, Shanghai 310058, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
THROMBUS FORMATION; MORPHOLOGY;
D O I
10.1063/5.0172261
中图分类号
O3 [力学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0801 ;
摘要
Comparing the hemodynamic parameters of thrombus-positive and thrombus-negative patients in the early stages of the disease (before thrombus formation occurs) can help predict atrial fibrillation-related thrombosis. However, most clinical images of thrombus-positive are of existing thrombus, and the presence of thrombi blurs the outline of the atrial appendage intima. Therefore, using the left atrial appendage (LAA) epicardial geometry for hemodynamic analysis has become a last resort. This study compares hemodynamic differences using the modeling contour of the inner and outer membranes of the LAA. The research results show the velocity and shear strain rate of the endocardial and epicardial geometries exhibit relative consistency. As for the parameters related to wall shear stress, the difference in time-averaged wall shear stress mainly occurs at the LAA entrance and does not affect the determination of thrombosis risk factors. The difference in the oscillatory shear index mainly occurs at the tip of LAA and the parts with larger curvature, which are seriously affected by geometry. The differences between endothelial cell activation potential (ECAP) and relative residence time (RRT) are concentrated at the tip of the LAA, but the maximum and minimum values are significantly different. After we exclude the top and bottom 5% of values, we believe that ECAP and RRT are reliable parameters. This investigation conducted both qualitative and quantitative assessments of the hemodynamic disparities between the endocardial and epicardial geometries. The findings offer valuable data reference for related research.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 41 条
  • [11] Stroke risk evaluation for patients with atrial fibrillation: Insights from left atrial appendage with fluid-structure interaction analysis
    Fang, Runxin
    Wang, Zidun
    Zhao, Xie
    Wang, Jun
    Li, Yang
    Zhang, Yanjuan
    Chen, Qiang
    Wang, Jiaqiu
    Liu, Quanjun
    Chen, Minglong
    Li, Zhiyong
    [J]. COMPUTERS IN BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE, 2022, 148
  • [12] Impact of left atrial appendage location on risk of thrombus formation in patients with atrial fibrillation
    Fang, Runxin
    Li, Yang
    Zhang, Yanjuan
    Chen, Qiang
    Liu, Quanjun
    Li, Zhiyong
    [J]. BIOMECHANICS AND MODELING IN MECHANOBIOLOGY, 2021, 20 (04) : 1431 - 1443
  • [13] Correlation between LAA Morphological Features and Computational Fluid Dynamics Analysis for Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation Patients
    Fanni, Benigno Marco
    Capellini, Katia
    Di Leonardo, Mario
    Clemente, Alberto
    Cerone, Elisa
    Berti, Sergio
    Celi, Simona
    [J]. APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2020, 10 (04):
  • [14] Sensitivity analysis of geometrical parameters to study haemodynamics and thrombus formation in the left atrial appendage
    Garcia-Isla, Guadalupe
    Luis Olivares, Andy
    Silva, Etelvino
    Nunez-Garcia, Marta
    Butakoff, Constantine
    Sanchez-Quintana, Damian
    Morales, Hernan G.
    Freixa, Xavier
    Noailly, Jerome
    De Potter, Tom
    Camara, Oscar
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR NUMERICAL METHODS IN BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2018, 34 (08)
  • [15] Joint Analysis of Morphological Parameters and In Silico Haemodynamics of the Left Atrial Appendage for Thrombogenic Risk Assessment
    Isabel Pons, Maria
    Mill, Jordi
    Fernandez-Quilez, Alvaro
    Olivares, Andy L.
    Silva, Etelvino
    de Potter, Tom
    Camara, Oscar
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIOLOGY, 2022, 2022
  • [16] The left atrial appendage in humans: structure, physiology, and pathogenesis
    Karim, Nabeela
    Ho, Siew Yen
    Nicol, Edward
    Li, Wei
    Zemrak, Filip
    Markides, Vias
    Reddy, Vivek
    Wong, Tom
    [J]. EUROPACE, 2020, 22 (01): : 5 - 18
  • [17] A comparison of hemodynamic metrics and intraluminal thrombus burden in a common iliac artery aneurysm
    Kelsey, Lachlan J.
    Powell, Janet T.
    Norman, Paul E.
    Miller, Karol
    Doyle, Barry J.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR NUMERICAL METHODS IN BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2017, 33 (05)
  • [18] Fractal Geometry Illustrated Left Atrial Appendage Morphology That Predicted Thrombosis and Stroke in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation
    Lei, Chuxiang
    Gao, Qi
    Wei, Runjie
    Li, Qijie
    Liu, Xingli
    Wu, Lingmin
    Yao, Yan
    Fan, Hongguang
    Zheng, Zhe
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2022, 9
  • [19] Computational fluid dynamics investigation on aortic hemodynamics in double aortic arch before and after ligation surgery
    Ling, Yunfei
    Schenkel, Torsten
    Tang, Jiguo
    Liu, Hongtao
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 2022, 141
  • [20] Computational fluid dynamics analysis of balloon-expandable coronary stents: Influence of stent and vessel deformation
    Martin, David M.
    Murphy, Eoin A.
    Boyle, Fergal J.
    [J]. MEDICAL ENGINEERING & PHYSICS, 2014, 36 (08) : 1047 - 1056