Newborn hearing screening in Germany-results of the 2011/2012 and 2017/2018 evaluations

被引:2
作者
Brockow, Inken [1 ]
Soehl, Kristina [1 ]
Hanauer, Marianne [1 ]
Heissenhuber, Annette [1 ]
Marzi, Carola [1 ]
Am Zehnhoff-Dinnesen, Antoinette [2 ]
Matulat, Peter [2 ]
Mansmann, Ulrich [3 ]
Nennstiel, Uta [1 ]
机构
[1] Bayer Landesamt Gesundheit & Lebensmittelsicherhei, Dienststelle Erlangen, GP1, Oberschleissheim, Germany
[2] Westfal Wilhelms Univ Munster UKM, Klin Phoniatrie & Padaudiol, Munster, Germany
[3] Ludwig Maximilians Univ LMU, Inst Informationsverarbeitung Biometrie & Epidemio, Munich, Germany
关键词
Newborn; Hearing screening; Lost to follow-up; Evaluation; Quality criteria; Hearingdisorder; Quality assurance; Screening; FOLLOW-UP; IMPAIRMENT; STATEMENT; CHILDREN;
D O I
10.1007/s00103-023-03779-0
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background. Newborn hearing screening (NHS) was introduced nationwide by the Federal Joint Committee (Gemeinsamer Bundesausschuss, G-BA) in 2009. In this process, quality targets were also set in the pediatrics directive. In order to review the quality NHS in Germany, the G-BA commissioned a consortium to conduct an initial evaluation for the years 2011 and 2012 and a follow-up evaluation for 2017 and 2018.Methods. The evaluations were based on NHS screening parameters (Sammelstatistiken) that must be documented by all obstetrics and neonatology departments as NHS providers and can also be compiled through cooperation with hearing screening centers (HSCs). Additional data were collected through questionnaires and interviews and routine data were used to evaluate the screening process.Results. In 13 federal states, a total of 15 HSCs are involved in the screening process. Across Germany, an NHS screening rate of 86.1% was documented in 2018 (82.4% in 2012), but this differed significantly between the federal states. The specified quality targets could not yet be implemented everywhere. For example, only less than half of the obstetric departments achieved the specified screening rate of over 95%. A comparison of data from the follow-up evaluation and the first evaluation showed that the structural quality of NHS had improved, while the process quality remained the same or had deteriorated. The refer rate (children who were discharged without passing the screening) increased from 5.3% to 6.0%.Discussion. To improve the quality of NHS, HSCs should be established nationwide and a second screening should be carried out more consistently before discharge in the case of a refer result in the initial screening.
引用
收藏
页码:1259 / 1267
页数:9
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   Improved Newborn Hearing Screening Follow-up Results in More Infants Identified [J].
Alam, Suhana ;
Gaffney, Marcus ;
Eichwald, John .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH MANAGEMENT AND PRACTICE, 2014, 20 (02) :220-223
[2]  
Brockow I, 2014, HNO, V62, P165, DOI 10.1007/s00106-014-2834-4
[3]  
Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Epidemiologie, 2018, Deutschsterreichische Leitlinien zur HIVPrexpositionsprophylaxe
[4]   German registry for hearing loss in children:: results after 4 years [J].
Finckh-Krämer, U ;
Spormann-Lagodzinski, M ;
Gross, M .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY, 2000, 56 (02) :113-127
[5]   Prevalence of permanent childhood hearing impairment in the United Kingdom and implications for universal neonatal hearing screening: questionnaire based ascertainment study [J].
Fortnum, HM ;
Summerfield, AQ ;
Marshall, DH ;
Davis, AC ;
Bamford, JM .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2001, 323 (7312) :536-539
[6]  
.g-ba, GEM BUND RICHTL GEM
[7]  
gbe-bund, 2021, Gesundheitsberichterstattung des Bundes.
[8]  
Gesellschaft fur Qualitat in der ausserklinischen Geburtshilfe e.V, 2018, MICR WORD BER 2018 D
[9]  
GOV.UK, 2022, PAT JOURN SCREEN REF
[10]   European Consensus Statement on Neonatal Hearing Screening [J].
Grandori, F .
JOURNAL OF LARYNGOLOGY AND OTOLOGY, 1998, 112 (12) :1219-1219