The impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 outbreak on decision-making styles and breastfeeding of pregnant women: a cross-sectional study

被引:0
|
作者
Karaahmet, Aysu Yildiz [1 ]
机构
[1] Halic Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Midwifery, Istanbul, Turkiye
来源
REVISTA DA ASSOCIACAO MEDICA BRASILEIRA | 2023年 / 69卷 / 08期
关键词
COVID-19; Pregnancy; Decision making; Breastfeeding;
D O I
10.1590/1806-9282.20230216
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: This study was planned to examine the factors affecting the decision-making styles of pregnant women in the coronavirus disease 2019 epidemic, their choice of birth environment, and their decision to start breastfeeding.METHODS: The study was conducted in a cross-sectional descriptive type. The study was conducted with 631 pregnant women who voluntarily participated between January 2020 and April 2021 and met the sample selection criteria. Women aged 18-45 years who had healthy singleton pregnancies were included. Pregnant women with signs or symptoms of coronavirus disease 2019 or suspected or diagnosed with birth were excluded from the study. The data were collected by the questionnaire method through the links shared with the pregnant women. Data Collection Form, Questionnaire for Birth and Breastfeeding in the coronavirus disease 2019 Period, and Melbourne Decision-Making Styles Scale-II were used as data collection tools.RESULTS: The mean age of the pregnant women was found to be 28.56 & PLUSMN;6.36 years. Approximately 50.71% of the participants reported that they preferred normal vaginal delivery. It was reported that 56.1% of the pregnant women had a say in the decision-making process of the delivery method. It has been determined that there is a significant difference between the education status, employment status, pregnancy planning, family type, and the person who has a say in deciding the mode of delivery (p<0.05). The results of the analysis of worrying about starting breastfeeding according to the decision-making styles of the pregnant women in the sample group are examined. The difference between the scores of avoidant and procrastinating decision-making style, which is the sub-dimensions of the scale, and worrying about starting breastfeeding is statistically significant (p<0.029 and p<0.029, respectively).CONCLUSION: The research findings show that situations such as epidemics affect the decisions of pregnant women, and breastfeeding situations and decision-making styles affect each other. For this reason, education programs and guides including guidance services and support systems should be published and pregnant women should be guided correctly.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Association between decision-making during pregnancy and woman-centred care among Tanzanian pregnant women: A cross-sectional survey
    Mwakawanga, Dorkasi L.
    Chen, Sanmei
    Mwilike, Beatrice
    Lyimo, Ally Abdul
    Hirose, Naoki
    Shimpuku, Yoko
    WOMEN AND BIRTH, 2024, 37 (04)
  • [22] Predictors of pregnant and breastfeeding women’s intention to use traditional Chinese medicine: a cross-sectional study from China
    Zanmei Li
    Jiao Li
    Yushan Lan
    Liangkun Ma
    Lei Xuan
    BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, 25 (1)
  • [23] SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine Willingness among Pregnant and Breastfeeding Women during the First Pandemic Wave: A Cross-Sectional Study in Switzerland
    Stuckelberger, Sarah
    Favre, Guillaume
    Ceulemans, Michael
    Nordeng, Hedvig
    Gerbier, Eva
    Lambelet, Valentine
    Stojanov, Milos
    Winterfeld, Ursula
    Baud, David
    Panchaud, Alice
    Pomar, Leo
    VIRUSES-BASEL, 2021, 13 (07):
  • [24] Information Resources Among Flemish Pregnant Women: Cross-sectional Study
    Lanssens, Dorien
    Thijs, Inge M.
    Dreesen, Pauline
    Van Hecke, Ann
    Coorevits, Pascal
    Gaethofs, Gitte
    Derycke, Joyce
    Tency, Inge
    JMIR FORMATIVE RESEARCH, 2022, 6 (10)
  • [25] Exclusive breastfeeding intention among pregnant women and associated variables: a cross-sectional study in a Brazilian community
    Silva, Lorena Fonseca
    Cortellazzi, Karine Laura
    de Melo, Leticia Santos Alves
    da Silva, Silvio Rocha Correa
    Rosell, Fernanda Lopez
    Junior, Aylton Valsecki
    Tagliaferro, Elaine Pereira da Silva
    REVISTA PAULISTA DE PEDIATRIA, 2024, 42
  • [26] Decision-making in the practice of female genital mutilation or cutting in Sudan: a cross-sectional study
    Sabahelzain, Majdi M.
    Eldin, Ahmed Gamal
    Babiker, Suad
    Kabiru, Caroline W.
    Eltayeb, Muna
    GLOBAL HEALTH RESEARCH AND POLICY, 2019, 4 (01)
  • [27] Midwifery scale to support shared decision-making for unplanned pregnancies: A cross-sectional study
    Ueno, Yoko
    Murakami, Mari
    Hattori, Minoru
    Fujimoto, Saori
    Okamura, Hitoshi
    NURSING & HEALTH SCIENCES, 2022, 24 (01) : 17 - 33
  • [28] Decision-making capacity for research participation among addicted people: a cross-sectional study
    Moran-Sanchez, Ines
    Luna, Aurelio
    Sanchez-Munoz, Maria
    Aguilera-Alcaraz, Beatriz
    Perez-Carceles, Maria D.
    BMC MEDICAL ETHICS, 2016, 17
  • [29] Decision-making capacity for research participation among addicted people: a cross-sectional study
    Inés Morán-Sánchez
    Aurelio Luna
    Maria Sánchez-Muñoz
    Beatriz Aguilera-Alcaraz
    Maria D. Pérez-Cárceles
    BMC Medical Ethics, 17
  • [30] Uninformed decision-making and regret about delaying childbearing decisions: A cross-sectional study
    Adachi, Tomoko
    Endo, Masayuki
    Ohashi, Kazutomo
    NURSING OPEN, 2020, 7 (05): : 1489 - 1496