Evaluating Change in Representation and Coordination in Collaborative Governance Over Time: A Study of Environmental Justice Councils

被引:11
作者
Siddiki, Saba [1 ]
Ambrose, Graham [1 ]
机构
[1] Syracuse Univ, 426 Eggers Hall, Syracuse, NY 13244 USA
关键词
Collaborative policymaking; Collaboration dynamics; Descriptive representation; Substantive representation; Environmental governance; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1007/s00267-022-01688-7
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Collaborative governance involves convening of government and non-government actors in policy formulation and implementation. Motivating collaborative governance is the expectation that engagement of diverse arrays of stakeholders in the public policy process allows policymakers and administrators to draw on the expertise, resources, and perspectives of these stakeholders to develop more contextually appropriate and effective policies. Since collaborative governance is fundamentally premised on the representation of diverse stakeholders in collaborative processes, assessing the extent to which representation is actualized is paramount. This paper adds to recent scholarship that examines representation dynamics in collaborative governance arrangements, focusing specifically on: (i) how diverse stakeholders included in collaborative governance arrangements are descriptively and substantively represented; (ii) how substantively represented stakeholders are coordinating on informational and relationship building activities; (iii) how representation and coordination dynamics change over time; and (iv) the extent to which representation and coordination dynamics are indicative of collaboration life cycle stage. Additionally, in responding to this latter aim, the paper presents a novel approach for measuring life cycle stages. The paper reports on a comparative case study of environmental justice councils, which are collaborative governance arrangements convened by states to assist in the design and implementation of policies aimed at reducing environmental harms within low income and minority populated communities.
引用
收藏
页码:620 / 640
页数:21
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2005, COOPERATION TRUST
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2021, Environmental justice
[3]   Collaborative governance in theory and practice [J].
Ansell, Chris ;
Gash, Alison .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION RESEARCH AND THEORY, 2008, 18 (04) :543-571
[4]   Understanding inclusion in collaborative governance: a mixed methods approach [J].
Ansell, Christopher ;
Doberstein, Carey ;
Henderson, Hayley ;
Siddiki, Saba ;
t'Hart, Paul .
POLICY AND SOCIETY, 2020, 39 (04) :570-591
[5]  
Beierle ThomasC., 2002, Democracy In Practice: Public Participation In Environmental Decisions
[6]   Improving the Effectiveness of Collaborative Governance Regimes: Lessons from Watershed Partnerships [J].
Biddle, Jennifer C. .
JOURNAL OF WATER RESOURCES PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, 2017, 143 (09)
[7]   Goal specificity: A proxy measure for improvements in environmental outcomes in collaborative governance [J].
Biddle, Jennifer C. ;
Koontz, Tomas M. .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2014, 145 :268-276
[8]  
Bingham L.B., 2011, The SAGE handbook of governance, P386, DOI DOI 10.4135/9781446200964.N25
[9]   The design and implementation of cross-sector collaborations: Propositions from the literature [J].
Bryson, John M. ;
Crosby, Barbara C. ;
Stone, Melissa Middleton .
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW, 2006, 66 :44-55
[10]   Explaining Coordination in Collaborative Partnerships and Clarifying the Scope of the Belief Homophily Hypothesis [J].
Calanni, John C. ;
Siddiki, Saba N. ;
Weible, Christopher M. ;
Leach, William D. .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION RESEARCH AND THEORY, 2015, 25 (03) :901-927