Do the Effects of Unpopular Supreme Court Rulings Linger? The Dobbs Decision Rescinding Abortion Rights

被引:8
作者
Gibson, James l. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Washington Univ, Dept Polit Sci, St Louis, MO 63130 USA
[2] Stellenbosch Univ, Ctr Comparat & Int Polit, Stellenbosch, South Africa
[3] Stellenbosch Univ, Polit Sci, Stellenbosch, South Africa
关键词
DYNAMICS;
D O I
10.1017/S0003055424000169
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
New evidence suggests that the world recently changed for the U.S. Supreme Court owing to its decision to abrogate the abortion rights first announced in Roe v. Wade. In contrast to the conventional wisdom that Court support is little undermined by unpopular rulings, the Dobbs decision generated a substantial knock on the Court's legitimacy. Two crucial frailties limit these findings, however. First, no one has determined whether the lost legitimacy has persisted, since earlier research relied on a one-shot survey conducted shortly after the decision. Second, no analysis has addressed the "values-based regeneration" hypothesis-that support reemerges not long after a legitimacy hit is inflicted. Based on a nationally representative 2023 survey, my analysis finds that the lost legitimacy has lingered, but institutional support may be being rebuilt owing to its close connection with democratic values. Overall, I conclude that understanding persistence is more complicated than many may have assumed.
引用
收藏
页码:500 / 507
页数:8
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   Policy, Politics, and Public Attitudes Toward the Supreme Court [J].
Ansolabehere, Stephen D. ;
White, Ariel .
AMERICAN POLITICS RESEARCH, 2020, 48 (03) :365-376
[2]   Politicized Battles: How Vacancies and Partisanship Influence Support for the Supreme Court [J].
Armaly, Miles T. ;
Lane, Elizabeth A. .
AMERICAN POLITICS RESEARCH, 2023, 51 (01) :23-36
[3]   On the Ideological Foundations of Supreme Court Legitimacy in the American Public [J].
Bartels, Brandon L. ;
Johnston, Christopher D. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2013, 57 (01) :184-199
[4]   Chief Justice Roberts's Health Care Decision Disrobed: The Microfoundations of the Supreme Court's Legitimacy [J].
Christenson, Dino P. ;
Glick, David M. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2015, 59 (02) :403-418
[5]   A Framework for the Study of Persuasion [J].
Druckman, James N. .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2022, 25 :65-88
[6]   Losing legitimacy: The challenges of the Dobbs ruling to conventional legitimacy theory [J].
Gibson, James L. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 68 (03) :1041-1056
[7]   Is the US Supreme Court's Legitimacy Grounded in Performance Satisfaction and Ideology? [J].
Gibson, James L. ;
Nelson, Michael J. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2015, 59 (01) :162-174
[8]  
Gibson James L., 2024, HARVARD DATAVERSE DA, DOI [10.7910/DVN/XNJSV3, DOI 10.7910/DVN/XNJSV3]
[9]  
Gibson James L., J LAW COURTS
[10]  
Gibson JamesL., 2012, Electing Judges: The Surprising Effects of Campaigning on Judicial Legitimacy