Sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor modulators in multiple sclerosis treatment: A practical review

被引:16
作者
Coyle, Patricia K. [1 ,7 ]
Freedman, Mark S. [2 ,3 ]
Cohen, Bruce A. [4 ]
Cree, Bruce A. C. [5 ]
Markowitz, Clyde E. [6 ]
机构
[1] SUNY Stony Brook, Stony Brook Renaissance Sch Med, Dept Neurol, Stony Brook, NY USA
[2] Univ Ottawa, Dept Med, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[3] Ottawa Hosp Res Inst, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[4] Northwestern Univ, Feinberg Sch Med, Dept Neurol, Chicago, IL USA
[5] Univ Calif San Francisco, Weill Inst Neurosci, Dept Neurol, San Francisco, CA USA
[6] Univ Penn, Perelman Sch Med, Dept Neurol, Philadelphia, PA USA
[7] Stony Brook Renaissance Sch Med, Dept Neurol, HSC T12, Room 020, Stony Brook, NY 11794 USA
关键词
ORAL FINGOLIMOD; DOUBLE-BLIND; INTERFERON; OUTCOMES; PHASE-3; TRIAL; RISK;
D O I
10.1002/acn3.52017
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Four sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P) receptor modulators (fingolimod, ozanimod, ponesimod, and siponimod) are approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of multiple sclerosis. This review summarizes efficacy and safety data on these S1P receptor modulators, with an emphasis on similarities and differences. Efficacy data from the pivotal clinical trials are generally similar for the four agents. However, because no head-to-head clinical studies were conducted, direct efficacy comparisons cannot be made. Based on the adverse event profile of S1P receptor modulators, continued and regular monitoring of patients during treatment will be instructive. Notably, the authors recommend paying attention to the cardiac monitoring guidelines for these drugs, and when indicated screening for macular edema and cutaneous malignancies before starting treatment. To obtain the best outcome, clinicians should choose the drug based on disease type, history, and concomitant medications for each patient. Real-world data should help to determine whether there are meaningful differences in efficacy or side effects between these agents.
引用
收藏
页码:842 / 855
页数:14
相关论文
共 75 条
[1]   Immune response to the third COVID-19 vaccine dose is related to lymphocyte count in multiple sclerosis patients treated with fingolimod [J].
Achiron, Anat ;
Mandel, Mathilda ;
Gurevich, Michael ;
Dreyer-Alster, Sapir ;
Magalashvili, David ;
Sonis, Polina ;
Dolev, Mark ;
Menascu, Shay ;
Harari, Gil ;
Flechter, Shlomo ;
Falb, Rina .
JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 2022, 269 (05) :2286-2292
[2]   Humoral immune response in multiple sclerosis patients following PfizerBNT162b2 COVID19 vaccination: Up to 6 months cross-sectional study [J].
Achiron, Anat ;
Mandel, Mathilda ;
Dreyer-Alster, Sapir ;
Harari, Gil ;
Dolev, Mark ;
Menascu, Shay ;
Magalashvili, David ;
Flechter, Shlomo ;
Givon, Uri ;
Guber, Diana ;
Sonis, Polina ;
Zilkha-Falb, Rina ;
Gurevich, Michael .
JOURNAL OF NEUROIMMUNOLOGY, 2021, 361
[3]   Cancer Risk for Fingolimod, Natalizumab, and Rituximab in Multiple Sclerosis Patients [J].
Alping, Peter ;
Askling, Johan ;
Burman, Joachim ;
Fink, Katharina ;
Fogdell-Hahn, Anna ;
Gunnarsson, Martin ;
Hillert, Jan ;
Langer-Gould, Annette ;
Lycke, Jan ;
Nilsson, Petra ;
Salzer, Jonatan ;
Svenningsson, Anders ;
Vrethem, Magnus ;
Olsson, Tomas ;
Piehl, Fredrik ;
Frisell, Thomas .
ANNALS OF NEUROLOGY, 2020, 87 (05) :688-699
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2022, TASC ODT PACK INS
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2023, GIL PACK INS
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2022, US PONVORY PREGN FEM
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2023, ZEP PACK INS
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2022, REPR TOX
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2022, MAYZ SUMM PROD CHAR
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2022, PROGR MULT LEUK KEY