Comparison of Rotterdam and Barcelona Magnetic Resonance Imaging Risk Calculators for Predicting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer

被引:9
作者
Morote, Juan [1 ,2 ,9 ]
Borque-Fernando, Angel [3 ]
Triquell, Marina [1 ,2 ]
Campistol, Miriam [1 ,2 ]
Servian, Pol [4 ]
Abascal, Jose M. [5 ,6 ]
Planas, Jacques [1 ,2 ]
Mendez, Olga [7 ]
Esteban, Luis M. [8 ]
Trilla, Enrique [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Vall Hebron Hosp, Dept Urol, Barcelona, Spain
[2] Univ Autonoma Barcelona, Dept Surg, Bellaterra, Spain
[3] Hosp Miguel Servet, Dept Urol, IIS Aragon, Zaragoza, Aragon, Spain
[4] Hosp Germans Trias I Pujol, Dept Urol, Badalona, Spain
[5] Parc Salut Mar, Dept Urol, Barcelona, Spain
[6] Univ Pompeu Fabra, Dept Surg, Badalona, Spain
[7] Vall Hebron Res Inst, Biomed Res Urol Unit, Barcelona, Spain
[8] Univ Zaragoza, Escuela Univ Politecn Almunia, Dept Appl Math, Zaragoza, Spain
[9] Vall Hebron Hosp, Dept Urol, Vall Hebron 119-129, Barcelona 08035, Spain
来源
EUROPEAN UROLOGY OPEN SCIENCE | 2023年 / 53卷
关键词
Prostate cancer; Clinically significant; Early detection; Magnetic resonance imaging; Predictive model; Risk calculator; DIAGNOSIS; CURVES; MODELS; PART;
D O I
10.1016/j.euros.2023.03.013
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based risk calculators (MRI-RCs) individualise the likelihood of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) and improve candidate selection for prostate biopsy beyond the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS). Objective: To compare the Barcelona (BCN) and Rotterdam (ROT) MRI-RCs in an entire population and according to the PI-RADS categories. Design, setting, and participants: A prospective comparison of BCN-and ROT-RC in 946 men with suspected prostate cancer in whom systematic biopsy was per-formed, as well as target biopsies of PI-RADS >3 lesions. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: Saved biopsies and undetected csPCa (grade group >2) were determined. Results and limitations: The csPCa detection was 40.8%. The median risks of csPCa from BCN-and ROT-RC were, respectively, 67.1% and 25% in men with csPCa, whereas 10.5% and 3% in those without csPCa (p < 0.001). The areas under the curve were 0.856 and 0.844, respectively (p = 0.116). BCN-RC showed a higher net benefit and clinical utility over ROT-RC. Using appropriate thresholds, respectively, 75% and 80% of biopsies were needed to identify 50% of csPCa detected in men with PI-RADS <3, whereas 35% and 21% of biopsies were saved, missing 10% of csPCa detected in men with PI-RADS 3. BCN-RC saved 15% of biopsies, missing 2% of csPCa in men with PI-RADS 4, whereas ROT-RC saved 10%, missing 6%. No RC saved biopsies without missing csPCa in men with PI-RADS 5. Conclusions: ROT-RC provided a lower and narrower range of csPCa probabilities than BCN-RC. BCN-RC showed a net benefit over ROT-RC in the entire population. However, BCN-RC was useful in men with PI-RADS 3 and 4, whereas ROT-RC was useful only in those with PI-RADS 3. No RC seemed to be helpful in men with neg-ative MRI and PI-RADS 5. Patient summary: Barcelona risk calculator was more helpful than Rotterdam risk calculator to select candidates for prostate biopsy. & COPY; 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of European Association of Urology. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creative-commons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:46 / 54
页数:9
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   Prediction of High-grade Prostate Cancer Following Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Improving the Rotterdam European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer Risk Calculators [J].
Alberts, Arnout R. ;
Roobol, Monique J. ;
Verbeek, Jan F. M. ;
Schoots, Ivo G. ;
Chiu, Peter K. ;
Osses, Daniel F. ;
Tijsterman, Jasper D. ;
Beerlage, Harrie P. ;
Mannaerts, Christophe K. ;
Schimmoeller, Lars ;
Albers, Peter ;
Arsov, Christian .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2019, 75 (02) :310-318
[2]   Implementing the use of nomograms by choosing threshold points in predictive models: 2012 updated Partin Tables vs a European predictive nomogram for organ-confined disease in prostate cancer [J].
Borque, Angel ;
Rubio-Briones, Jose ;
Esteban, Luis M. ;
Sanz, Gerardo ;
Dominguez-Escrig, Jose ;
Ramirez-Backhaus, Miguel ;
Calatrava, Ana ;
Solsona, Eduardo .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 113 (06) :878-886
[3]   Comparing the prediction of prostate biopsy outcome using the Chinese Prostate Cancer Consortium (CPCC) Risk Calculator and the Asian adapted Rotterdam European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) Risk Calculator in Chinese and European men [J].
Chen, Rui ;
Verbeek, Jan F. M. ;
Yang, Yue ;
Song, Zijian ;
Sun, Yinghao ;
Roobol, Monique J. .
WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2021, 39 (01) :73-80
[4]   ROC CURVES FOR DISCRIMINATION OF LINEAR EXTENT [J].
CREELMAN, CD ;
DONALDSON, W .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1968, 77 (3P1) :514-+
[5]   Rotterdam mobile phone app including MRI data for the prediction of prostate cancer: A multicenter external validation [J].
De Nunzio, Cosimo ;
Lombardo, Riccardo ;
Baldassarri, Valeria ;
Cindolo, Luca ;
Bertolo, Riccardo ;
Minervini, Andrea ;
Sessa, Francesco ;
Muto, Gianluca ;
Bove, Pierluigi ;
Vittori, Matteo ;
Bozzini, Giorgio ;
Castellan, Pietro ;
Mugavero, Filippo ;
Falsaperla, Mario ;
Schips, Luigi ;
Celia, Antonio ;
Bada, Maida ;
Porreca, Angelo ;
Pastore, Antonio ;
Al Salhi, Yazan ;
Giampaoli, Marco ;
Novella, Giovanni ;
Rizzetto, Riccardo ;
Trabacchin, Nicolo ;
Mantica, Guglielmo ;
Pini, Giovannalberto ;
Remmers, Sebastiaan ;
Antonelli, Alessandro ;
Tubaro, Andrea .
EJSO, 2021, 47 (10) :2640-2645
[6]   COMPARING THE AREAS UNDER 2 OR MORE CORRELATED RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC CURVES - A NONPARAMETRIC APPROACH [J].
DELONG, ER ;
DELONG, DM ;
CLARKEPEARSON, DI .
BIOMETRICS, 1988, 44 (03) :837-845
[7]   Statistical methods for validation of predictive models [J].
Diniz, Marcio Augusto .
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR CARDIOLOGY, 2022, 29 (06) :3248-3255
[8]   A Contemporary Prostate Cancer Grading System: A Validated Alternative to the Gleason Score [J].
Epstein, Jonathan I. ;
Zelefsky, Michael J. ;
Sjoberg, Daniel D. ;
Nelson, Joel B. ;
Egevad, Lars ;
Magi-Galluzzi, Cristina ;
Vickers, Andrew J. ;
Parwani, Anil V. ;
Reuter, Victor E. ;
Fine, Samson W. ;
Eastham, James A. ;
Wiklund, Peter ;
Han, Misop ;
Reddy, Chandana A. ;
Ciezki, Jay P. ;
Nyberg, Tommy ;
Klein, Eric A. .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2016, 69 (03) :428-435
[9]   Positive Predictive Value of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 for the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis [J].
Mazzone, Elio ;
Stabile, Armando ;
Pellegrino, Francesco ;
Basile, Giuseppe ;
Cignoli, Daniele ;
Cirulli, Giuseppe Ottone ;
Sorce, Gabriele ;
Barletta, Francesco ;
Scuderi, Simone ;
Bravi, Carlo Andrea ;
Cucchiara, Vito ;
Fossati, Nicola ;
Gandaglia, Giorgio ;
Montorsi, Francesco ;
Briganti, Alberto .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY ONCOLOGY, 2021, 4 (05) :697-713
[10]   Implementing risk calculators: time for the Trojan Horse? [J].
Moonesinghe, S. R. ;
Bashford, T. ;
Wagstaff, D. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2018, 121 (06) :1192-1195