Locating new docked bike sharing stations considering demand suitability and spatial accessibility

被引:7
作者
Chen, Wendong [1 ,2 ]
Chen, Xuewu [1 ,2 ]
Cheng, Long [1 ,2 ]
Chen, Jingxu [1 ,2 ]
Tao, Sui [3 ]
机构
[1] Southeast Univ, Sch Transportat, Nanjing, Peoples R China
[2] Southeast Univ, Jiangsu Key Lab Urban ITS, Nanjing, Peoples R China
[3] Beijing Normal Univ, Fac Geog Sci, Beijing, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Bike sharing; Station location; Location-allocation model; Spatial accessibility; RELATIVE IMPORTANCE; PUBLIC BICYCLE; HEALTH-CARE; SYSTEMS; EQUITY; DETERMINANTS; PERFORMANCE; REGRESSION; WALKING; INCOME;
D O I
10.1016/j.tbs.2023.100675
中图分类号
U [交通运输];
学科分类号
08 ; 0823 ;
摘要
In recent years, a growing number of cities worldwide have implemented docked bike sharing (DBS) systems. One of the most important features to the success of a DBS scheme is the deployment of the stations. However, prior studies on locating DBS stations have focused on travel demand while accessibility factors received limited attention. To tackle the above issue, this study proposes a three-stage framework to determine the appropriate locations for new DBS stations. Concretely, first, important factors influencing DBS usage are explored to yield a demand-based suitability map. Second, the ease of access to DBS services aggregated at demand points is assessed to generate a DBS accessibility map. Finally, combined with suitability and accessibility maps, a locationallocation model is leveraged to identify locations for building new stations to serve the most potential demand. A case study is conducted in Nanjing, China. The identification results show that ten new stations can further expand the DBS service area outward to some extent (from 80.71% to 83.87%) while meeting the high suitability and low accessibility conditions. These findings provide a useful tool for transportation planners and policymakers to take appropriate measures to achieve an equitable and profitable DBS system.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 81 条
[61]  
National Association of City Transportation Officials (NACTO), 2018, Bike share in the U. S.: 2017
[62]   Accessibility, equity and health care: review and research directions for transport geographers [J].
Neutens, Tijs .
JOURNAL OF TRANSPORT GEOGRAPHY, 2015, 43 :14-27
[63]  
Nickkar Amirreza., 2019, CITY CULTURE SOC, V18, P100291, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.CCS.2019.100291
[64]   Demand and level of service inflation in Floating Catchment Area (FCA) methods [J].
Paez, Antonio ;
Higgins, Christopher D. ;
Vivona, Salvatore F. .
PLOS ONE, 2019, 14 (06)
[65]   What factors influence bike share ridership? An investigation of Hamilton, Ontario's bike share hubs [J].
Scott, Darren M. ;
Ciuro, Celenna .
TRAVEL BEHAVIOUR AND SOCIETY, 2019, 16 :50-58
[66]   Bikesharing in Europe, the Americas, and Asia Past, Present, and Future [J].
Shaheen, Susan A. ;
Guzman, Stacey ;
Zhang, Hua .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD, 2010, (2143) :159-167
[67]   Understanding the usage of dockless bike sharing in Singapore [J].
Shen, Yu ;
Zhang, Xiaohu ;
Zhao, Jinhua .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE TRANSPORTATION, 2018, 12 (09) :686-700
[68]   Conditional variable importance for random forests [J].
Strobl, Carolin ;
Boulesteix, Anne-Laure ;
Kneib, Thomas ;
Augustin, Thomas ;
Zeileis, Achim .
BMC BIOINFORMATICS, 2008, 9 (1)
[69]   Promoting public bike-sharing: A lesson from the unsuccessful Pronto system [J].
Sun, Feiyang ;
Chen, Peng ;
Jiao, Junfeng .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART D-TRANSPORT AND ENVIRONMENT, 2018, 63 :533-547
[70]   Relative importance of factors influencing building energy in urban environment [J].
Tian, Wei ;
Liu, Yunliang ;
Heo, Yeonsook ;
Yan, Da ;
Li, Zhanyong ;
An, Jingjing ;
Yang, Song .
ENERGY, 2016, 111 :237-250