The Real Post-Operative Range of Motion Differs from the Virtual Pre-Operative Planned Range of Motion in Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty

被引:3
作者
Berhouet, Julien [1 ,2 ]
Samargandi, Ramy [1 ,3 ]
Favard, Luc [1 ]
Turbillon, Celine [1 ]
Jacquot, Adrien [4 ]
Gauci, Marc-Olivier [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tours, Fac Med Tours, CHRU Trousseau, Serv Orthopedie Traumatol, 1C Ave Republ, F-37170 Tours, France
[2] Univ Tours, Ecole Ingn Polytech, Equipe Reconnaissance Forme & Anal Image, Lab Informat Fondamentale & Appl Tours EA6300, 64 Ave Portalis, F-37200 Tours, France
[3] Univ Jeddah, Fac Med, Dept Orthoped Surg, Jeddah 23218, Saudi Arabia
[4] Ctr Chirurg Articulat & Sport ARTICS, 24 rue XXIeme Regiment Aviat, F-54000 Nancy, France
[5] Hop Pasteur 2, Inst Locomoteur & Sport, 30 Voie Romaine, F-06000 Nice, France
关键词
reverse shoulder arthroplasty; range of motion; preoperative planning; scapulothoracic joint; soft tissues; motion analysis; IMPINGEMENT; INCLINATION; MOVEMENT; OUTCOMES; IMPACT;
D O I
10.3390/jpm13050765
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: The purpose of this study was to analyze the real range of motion (RoM) measured in patients operated on for reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) and compare it to the virtual RoM provided by the preoperative planning software. Hypothesis: There was a difference between virtual and real RoM, which can be explained by different factors, specifically the scapulathoracic (ST) joint. Methods: Twenty patients with RSA were assessed at a minimum follow-up of 18 months. Passive RoM in forward elevation abduction, without and with manually locking the ST joint, and in external rotation with arm at side were recorded. The humerus, scapula, and implants were manually segmented on post-operative CTs. Post-operative bony structures were registered to preoperative bony elements. From this registration, a post-operative plan corresponding to the real post-operative implant positioning was generated and the corresponding virtual RoM analysis was recorded. On the post-operative anteroposterior X-rays and 2D-CT coronal planning view, the glenoid horizontal line angle (GH), the metaphyseal horizontal line angle (MH), and the gleno-metaphyseal angle (GMA) were measured to assess the extrinsic glenoid inclination, as well as the relative position of the humeral and glenoid components. Results: There were some significant differences between virtual and post-operative passive abduction and forward elevation, with (55 degrees and 50 degrees, p < 0.0001) or without ST joint participation (15 degrees and 27 degrees, p < 0.002). For external rotation with arm at side, there was no significant difference between planning (24 degrees +/- 26 degrees) and post-operative clinical observation (19 degrees +/- 12 degrees) (p = 0.38). For the angle measurements, the GMA was significantly higher (42.8 degrees +/- 15.2 degrees vs. 29.1 degrees +/- 18.2 degrees, p < 0.0001), and the GH angle, significantly lower on the virtual planning (85.2 degrees +/- 8.8 degrees vs. 99.5 degrees +/- 12.5 degrees, p < 0.0001), while the MH was not different (p = 0.33). Conclusions: The virtual RoM given by the planning software used in this study differs from the real post-operative passive RoM, except for external rotation. This can be explained by the lack of ST joint and soft tissues simulation. However, in focusing on the virtual GH participation, the simulation looks informative. Some modifications between the glenoid and humerus starting positions before running the motion analysis could be provided for making it more realistic and predictive of the RSA functional results. Level of evidence: III.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   The active and passive kinematic difference between primary reverse and total shoulder prostheses [J].
Alta, Tjarco D. W. ;
de Toledo, Joelly M. ;
Veeger, H. E. ;
Janssen, Thomas W. J. ;
Willems, W. Jaap .
JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2014, 23 (09) :1395-1402
[2]   Impact of humeral and glenoid component variations on range of motion in reverse geometry total shoulder arthroplasty: a standardized computer model study [J].
Arenas-Miquelez, Antonio ;
Murphy, Richard J. ;
Rosa, Andrea ;
Caironi, Davide ;
Zumstein, Matthias A. .
JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2021, 30 (04) :763-771
[3]   Long-Term Outcomes of Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty A Follow-up of a Previous Study [J].
Bacle, Guillaume ;
Nove-Josserand, Laurent ;
Garaud, Pascal ;
Walch, Gilles .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2017, 99 (06) :454-461
[4]   Preoperative planning for accurate glenoid component positioning in reverse shoulder arthroplasty [J].
Berhouet, J. ;
Gulotta, L. V. ;
Dines, D. M. ;
Craig, E. ;
Warren, R. F. ;
Choi, D. ;
Chen, X. ;
Kontaxis, A. .
ORTHOPAEDICS & TRAUMATOLOGY-SURGERY & RESEARCH, 2017, 103 (03) :407-413
[5]   Displacement of the instantaneous center of rotation of the humeral head during abduction: implication for scapulohumeral muscular function [J].
Blaimont, P ;
Taheri, A ;
Vanderhofstadt, A .
REVUE DE CHIRURGIE ORTHOPEDIQUE ET REPARATRICE DE L APPAREIL MOTEUR, 2005, 91 (05) :399-406
[6]  
BOILEAU P, 1992, REV CHIR ORTHOP, V78, P355
[7]   Automated Three-Dimensional Measurement of Glenoid Version and Inclination in Arthritic Shoulders [J].
Boileau, Pascal ;
Cheval, Damien ;
Gauci, Marc-Olivier ;
Holzer, Nicolas ;
Chaoui, Jean ;
Walch, Gilles .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2018, 100 (01) :57-65
[8]   Scapular notching in reverse shoulder arthroplasties: The influence of glenometaphyseal angle [J].
Falaise, V. ;
Levigne, C. ;
Favard, L. .
ORTHOPAEDICS & TRAUMATOLOGY-SURGERY & RESEARCH, 2011, 97 (06) :S131-S137
[9]   Kinematic analysis of dynamic shoulder motion in patients with reverse total shoulder arthroplasty [J].
Kwon, Young W. ;
Pinto, Vivek J. ;
Yoon, Jangwhon ;
Frankle, Mark A. ;
Dunning, Page E. ;
Sheikhzadeh, Ali .
JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2012, 21 (09) :1184-1190
[10]   Effect of humeral stem and glenosphere designs on range of motion and muscle length in reverse shoulder arthroplasty [J].
Ladermann, Alexandre ;
Denard, Patrick J. ;
Collin, Philippe ;
Zbinden, Olivia ;
Chiu, Joe Chih-Hao ;
Boileau, Pascal ;
Olivier, Flora ;
Walch, Gilles .
INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2020, 44 (03) :519-530