COVID-19, recovery policies and the resilience of EU ETS

被引:11
作者
Dong, Hanmin [1 ,2 ]
Tan, Xiujie [3 ,4 ]
Cheng, Si [5 ,6 ]
Liu, Yishuang [7 ]
机构
[1] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Management, Wuhan, Peoples R China
[2] City Univ Hong Kong, Sch Energy & Environm, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[3] Wuhan Univ, Inst Int Studies, CICTSMR, Wuhan, Peoples R China
[4] Wuhan Univ, Climate Change & Energy Econ Study Ctr, Wuhan, Peoples R China
[5] Hubei Univ Econ, Sch Low Carbon Econ, Wuhan, Peoples R China
[6] Hubei Univ Econ, Ctr Hubei Cooperat Innovat Emiss Trading Syst, Wuhan, Peoples R China
[7] Wuhan Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Wuhan, Hubei, Peoples R China
关键词
EU ETS; COVID-19; pandemic; Government responses; Fiscal policies; Green recovery; EMPIRICAL MODE DECOMPOSITION; CARBON MARKET; PHASE-II; PRICE DRIVERS; STOCK-MARKET; CO2; EMISSION; ENERGY; ELECTRICITY;
D O I
10.1007/s10644-021-09372-2
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
COVID-19 pandemic and its recovery bring opportunities and threats for global climate governance and further challenge climate related assets. In this study, we analyze the efficiency of government response policies and fiscal policies on green recovery by observing the variation characteristics of carbon allowance prices in the EU emission trading system (EU ETS). Using the OLS and threshold methods in the original time scales, we find that: (1) The EUA prices had an inverted U-shaped relationship with the number of new confirmed cases and deaths. (2) Government response policies had a better effect than fiscal policies when mitigating the negative impact of the pandemic. After decomposing and reconstructing the time series, the multiscale analysis indicates that: (3) The carbon price fluctuated in the short term with the increasing number of newly confirmed cases (or deaths) but gradually recovered due to the recovery policies. (4) Government response policies had a "stop-loss" effect in the short term, and then working alongside fiscal policies, sustained and promoted the development of the EU ETS and green recovery. In the post-COVID-19 era, we suggest the combination of various policies to convert the current health crisis into opportunities for climate change mitigation.
引用
收藏
页码:2965 / 2991
页数:27
相关论文
共 93 条
[1]   Price determination in the EU ETS market: Theory and econometric analysis with market fundamentals [J].
Aatola, Piia ;
Ollikainen, Markku ;
Toppinen, Anne .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2013, 36 :380-395
[2]   Death and contagious infectious diseases: Impact of the COVID-19 virus on stock market returns [J].
Al-Awadhi, Abdullah M. ;
Alsaifi, Khaled ;
Al-Awadhi, Ahmad ;
Alhammadi, Salah .
JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL AND EXPERIMENTAL FINANCE, 2020, 27
[3]   Price drivers and structural breaks in European carbon prices 2005-2007 [J].
Alberola, Emilie ;
Chevallier, Julien ;
Cheze, Benoit .
ENERGY POLICY, 2008, 36 (02) :787-797
[4]   Fiscal response to the COVID-19 crisis in advanced and emerging market economies† [J].
Alberola, Enrique ;
Arslan, Yavuz ;
Cheng, Gong ;
Moessner, Richhild .
PACIFIC ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2021, 26 (04) :459-468
[5]   How will country-based mitigation measures influence the course of the COVID-19 epidemic? [J].
Anderson, Roy M. ;
Heesterbeek, Hans ;
Klinkenberg, Don ;
Hollingsworth, T. Deirdre .
LANCET, 2020, 395 (10228) :931-934
[9]  
Azarova V, 2020, MSR EXOGENOUS SHOCK
[10]   The Unprecedented Stock Market Reaction to COVID-19 [J].
Baker, Scott R. ;
Bloom, Nicholas ;
Davis, Steven J. ;
Kost, Kyle ;
Sammon, Marco ;
Viratyosin, Tasaneeya .
REVIEW OF ASSET PRICING STUDIES, 2020, 10 (04) :742-758