From impacts to dependencies: A first global assessment of corporate biodiversity risk exposure and responses

被引:35
作者
de Carvalho, Sergio Henrique Collaco [1 ]
Cojoianu, Theodor [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Ascui, Francisco [2 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oxford, Sch Geog & Environm, South Parks Rd, Oxford 1 3QY, England
[2] Univ Edinburgh, Business Sch, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
[3] EU Commiss, DG FISMA, EU Platform Sustainable Finance, Brussels, Belgium
[4] HM Treasury, Green Tech Advisory Grp, London, England
[5] Federation Univ, Ctr eRes & Digital Innovat, Univ Dr, Mt Helen, Vic, Australia
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
biodiversity; dependencies; impacts; materiality; natural capital; risk; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; SUSTAINABILITY; MANAGEMENT; BUSINESS;
D O I
10.1002/bse.3142
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
There is growing awareness that biodiversity loss poses a significant risk to the global economy, but a lack of clarity on what this means for corporations, and how they are responding. This study provides a first quantitative assessment of biodiversity risk exposure across the world's largest listed companies, compared with their adoption of biodiversity policies, through analysis of disclosures from a sample of 11,812 companies from 2004 to 2018. We find that companies have started responding strategically to biodiversity risk, with 29% having adopted a biodiversity policy by 2018. However, around $7.2 trillion of total enterprise value remains exposed to unmanaged biodiversity risk. Companies in sectors with material impacts on biodiversity tend to have high levels of response, but there is poorer responsiveness to material biodiversity dependency risks. A natural-capital-based view (NCBV) of the firm is proposed to theorise how corporations are constrained by both their impacts and dependencies on natural capital.
引用
收藏
页码:2600 / 2614
页数:15
相关论文
共 82 条
[61]  
OECD, 2019, BIODIVERSITY FINANCE
[62]   ECONOMICS, EQUITY AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT [J].
PEARCE, D .
FUTURES, 1988, 20 (06) :598-605
[63]  
Qin XL, 2017, 2017 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PROGNOSTICS AND HEALTH MANAGEMENT (ICPHM), P1, DOI [10.1109/ATNAC.2017.8215431, 10.1109/ICPHM.2017.7998297]
[64]   Biodiversity reporting in Sweden: corporate disclosure and preparers' views [J].
Rimmel, Gunnar ;
Jonall, Kristina .
ACCOUNTING AUDITING & ACCOUNTABILITY JOURNAL, 2013, 26 (05) :746-778
[65]  
Schaltegger S, 2010, CORPORATE BIODIVERSI
[66]   Accurate accounting: How to balance ecosystem services and disservices [J].
Shapiro, Julie ;
Baldi, Andras .
ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2014, 7 :201-202
[67]   The Biodiversity Paradigm: Building Resilience for Human and Environmental Health [J].
Shroff R. ;
Cortés C.R. .
Development, 2020, 63 (2-4) :172-180
[68]   Will the EU Commission Successfully Integrate Sustainability Risks and Factors in the Investor Protection Regime? A Research Agenda [J].
Siri, Michele ;
Zhu, Shanshan .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (22)
[69]   MANAGING LEGITIMACY - STRATEGIC AND INSTITUTIONAL APPROACHES [J].
SUCHMAN, MC .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1995, 20 (03) :571-610
[70]  
TCFD, 2017, RECOMMENDATIONS TASK