Real-world cost- effectiveness analysis: Tumor Treating Fields for newly diagnosed glioblastoma in China

被引:1
|
作者
Xiang, Yuliang [1 ,2 ]
Chen, Yingyao [1 ,2 ]
Xu, Zian [1 ,2 ]
Zhou, Shanyan [1 ,2 ]
Qin, Zhiyong [3 ,4 ]
Chen, Lingchao [3 ,4 ]
Xiao, Dunming [1 ,2 ]
Liu, Shimeng [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Fudan Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[2] Fudan Univ, Key Lab Hlth Technol Assessment, Natl Hlth Commiss, 130 Dongan Rd, Shanghai 200032, Peoples R China
[3] Fudan Univ, Huashan Hosp, Dept Neurosurg, Shanghai 200040, Peoples R China
[4] Natl Ctr Neurol Disorders, Shanghai 200040, Peoples R China
关键词
Cost-effectiveness analysis; Glioblastoma; Tumor Treating Fields; Real-world evidence; MAINTENANCE TEMOZOLOMIDE; SURVIVAL; MANAGEMENT; THERAPY; CANCER;
D O I
10.1007/s11060-024-04662-x
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BackgroundGlioblastoma (GBM) stands as the most aggressive and prevalent primary brain malignancy. Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields), an innovative therapy complementing chemotherapy for GBM treatment, which can significantly enhance overall survival, disease progression-free survival, and patient's quality of life. However, there is a dearth of health economics evaluation on TTFields therapy both domestically and internationally.ObjectiveThe study aims to assess the cost-effectiveness of TTFields + temozolomide (TMZ) in comparison to TMZ alone for newly diagnosed GBM patients. The intent is to provide robust economic evidence to serve as a foundation for policymaking and decision-making processes in GBM treatment.MethodsWe estimated outcomes for newly diagnosed GBM patients over a lifetime horizon using a partitioned survival model with three states: Progression-Free Survival, Progression Disease, and Death. The survival model was derived from a real-world study in China, with long-term survival data drawn from GBM epidemiology literature. Adverse event rates were sourced from the EF-14 trial data. Cost data, validated by expert consultation, was obtained from public literature and databases. Utility values were extracted from published literature. Using Microsoft Excel, we calculated expected costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) over 15 years from a health system perspective. The willingness-to-pay threshold was set at three times the Chinese per capita Gross Domestic Product (GDP) in 2022, amounting to CN yen 242,928 (US$37,655) /QALY. A 5% discount rate was applied to costs and utilities. Results underwent analysis through single factor and probability sensitivity analyses.ResultsTTFields + TMZ demonstrated a mean increase in cost by CN yen 389,326 (US$57,859) and an increase of 2.46 QALYs compared to TMZ alone. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was CN yen 157,979 (US$23,474) per QALY gained. The model exhibited heightened sensitivity to changes in the discount rate. Probability sensitivity analysis indicates that, under the existing threshold, the probability of TTFields + TMZ being economical is 95.60%.ConclusionsThis cost-effectiveness analysis affirms that incorporating TTFields into TMZ treatment proves to be cost-effective, given a threshold three times the Chinese per capita GDP.
引用
收藏
页码:259 / 267
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Analysis of physical characteristics of Tumor Treating Fields for human glioblastoma
    Lok, Edwin
    San, Pyay
    Hua, Van
    Phung, Melissa
    Wong, Eric T.
    CANCER MEDICINE, 2017, 6 (06): : 1286 - 1300
  • [22] Real-World Effectiveness of Dasatinib Versus Imatinib in Newly Diagnosed Patients With Chronic Myeloid Leukemia
    Klink, Andrew J.
    Keating, Scott J.
    Brokars, John
    Feinberg, Bruce
    Jabbour, Elias
    CLINICAL LYMPHOMA MYELOMA & LEUKEMIA, 2024, 24 (03) : 149 - 157
  • [23] Efficacy and Safety of Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) in Elderly Patients with Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma: Subgroup Analysis of the Phase 3 EF-14 Clinical Trial
    Ram, Zvi
    Kim, Chae-Yong
    Hottinger, Andreas F.
    Idbaih, Ahmed
    Nicholas, Garth
    Zhu, Jay-Jiguang
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2021, 11
  • [24] Chemoradiation treatment with or without concurrent tumor-treating fields (TTFields) therapy in newly diagnosed glioblastoma (GBM) patients in China
    Liping Liang
    Lingchao Chen
    Chunxia Ni
    Wenyin Shi
    Zhirui Zhou
    Shu Chen
    Wenjia Zhu
    Jiabing Liu
    Xianxin Qiu
    Wanzun Lin
    Junyan Zhang
    Zhiyong Qin
    Yang Wang
    Chinese Neurosurgical Journal, 11 (1)
  • [25] Tumor-Treating Fields for the treatment of glioblastoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Regev, Ohad
    Merkin, Vladimir
    Blumenthal, Deborah T.
    Melamed, Israel
    Kaisman-Elbaz, Tehila
    NEURO-ONCOLOGY PRACTICE, 2021, 8 (04) : 426 - 440
  • [26] Tumour Treating Fields (TTFs) for recurrent and newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme
    Mirza, Farhan A.
    Shamim, Muhammad Shahzad
    JOURNAL OF THE PAKISTAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2018, 68 (10) : 1543 - 1545
  • [27] Tumor-treating fields as a fourth treating modality for glioblastoma: a meta-analysis
    Magouliotis, Dimitrios E.
    Asprodini, Eftihia K.
    Svokos, Konstantina A.
    Tasiopoulou, Vasiliki S.
    Svokos, Alexis A.
    Toms, Steven A.
    ACTA NEUROCHIRURGICA, 2018, 160 (06) : 1167 - 1174
  • [28] Real-World Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: How Much Uncertainty Is in the Results?
    Barr, Heather K.
    Guggenbickler, Andrea M.
    Hoch, Jeffrey S.
    Dewa, Carolyn S.
    CURRENT ONCOLOGY, 2023, 30 (04) : 4078 - 4093
  • [29] The cost-effectiveness of temozolomide in the adjuvant treatment of newly diagnosed glioblastoma in the United States
    Messali, Andrew
    Hay, Joel W.
    Villacorta, Reginald
    NEURO-ONCOLOGY, 2013, 15 (11) : 1532 - 1542
  • [30] Tumor treating fields plus temozolomide for newly diagnosed glioblastoma: a sub-group analysis of Korean patients in the EF-14 phase 3 trial
    Chae-Yong Kim
    Sun Ha Paek
    Do-hyun Nam
    Jong-Hee Chang
    Yong-Kil Hong
    Jeong Hoon Kim
    Oh Lyong Kim
    Se-Hyuk Kim
    Journal of Neuro-Oncology, 2020, 146 : 399 - 406