How Affective Polarization Deepens the Partisan Divide in US Cable News Use

被引:5
作者
Kim, Youngju [1 ]
Kim, Yonghwan [1 ]
机构
[1] Dongguk Univ, Dept Media & Commun, 30 Pildong Ro 1 Gil, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
affective polarization; selective exposure; credibility judgment; partisan media; cable news; SELECTIVE EXPOSURE; MEDIA BIAS; PERCEPTIONS; INFORMATION; CREDIBILITY; SELF; COMMUNICATION; MANAGEMENT; ATTITUDES; POLITICS;
D O I
10.1027/1864-1105/a000414
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
Currently, not only are partisans' feelings toward Democrats and Republicans sharply divided along party lines, but so too are their choices regarding news media. Regarding this polarization, most studies have considered partisans' selective use of news outlets as a crucial factor in widening affective polarization. However, insufficient attention has been directed to the potential role of affective polarization in selective exposure. Accordingly, this study seeks to fill this gap by verifying the effect of affective polarization on selective exposure and examining a potential mechanism using two-wave panel data. Our findings demonstrate that the degree of affective polarization is positively related to partisan bias in the credibility judgment of pro-party and counter-party cable news channels. In turn, favorable in-group bias in the credibility judgment of cable news channels has a significant effect on selective exposure to cable news outlets, mediating the effect of individual-level affective polarization on selective exposure. Lastly, we discuss the theoretical implications of our findings.
引用
收藏
页码:369 / 380
页数:12
相关论文
共 75 条
[1]   Perceived similarity of exemplar traits and behavior - Effects on message evaluation [J].
Andsager, JL ;
Bemker, V ;
Choi, HL ;
Torwel, V .
COMMUNICATION RESEARCH, 2006, 33 (01) :3-18
[2]   How Much Time Do You Spend Online? Understanding and Improving the Accuracy of Self-Reported Measures of Internet Use [J].
Araujo, Theo ;
Wonneberger, Anke ;
Neijens, Peter ;
de Vreese, Claes .
COMMUNICATION METHODS AND MEASURES, 2017, 11 (03) :173-190
[3]   Polarized Political Communication, Oppositional Media Hostility, and Selective Exposure [J].
Arceneaux, Kevin ;
Johnson, Martin ;
Murphy, Chad .
JOURNAL OF POLITICS, 2012, 74 (01) :174-186
[4]   Group allegiances and perceptions of media bias: Taking into account both the perceiver and the source [J].
Ariyanto, Amarina ;
Hornsey, Matthew J. ;
Gallois, Cindy .
GROUP PROCESSES & INTERGROUP RELATIONS, 2007, 10 (02) :266-279
[5]   Ingroup Favoritism in Cooperation: A Meta-Analysis [J].
Balliet, Daniel ;
Wu, Junhui ;
De Dreu, Carsten K. W. .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 2014, 140 (06) :1556-1581
[6]   In the eye of the beholder: How information shortcuts shape individual perceptions of bias in the media [J].
Baum, Matthew A. ;
Gussin, Phil .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2008, 3 (01) :1-31
[7]  
Bethlehem J., 2011, HDB NONRESPONSE HOUS
[8]  
Boxell L., 2020, W26669 NAT BUR EC RE, DOI [https://doi.org/10.1162/rest_a_01160, DOI 10.1162/REST_A_01160]
[9]   The psychology of prejudice: Ingroup love or outgroup hate? [J].
Brewer, MB .
JOURNAL OF SOCIAL ISSUES, 1999, 55 (03) :429-444
[10]  
Campbell DT., 1999, PRIMER REGRESSION AR