Norwegian offshore wind power-Spatial planning using multi-criteria decision analysis

被引:5
作者
Solbrekke, Ida Marie [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Sorteberg, Asgeir [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bergen, Geophys Inst, Bergen Offshore Wind Ctr, Bergen, Norway
[2] Univ Bergen, Geophys Inst, Bergen Offshore Wind Ctr BOW, Bjerknes Ctr Climate Res BCCR, Bergen, Norway
[3] Univ Bergen, Geophys Inst, Bergen Offshore Wind Ctr BOW, Allegaten 70, N-5020 Bergen, Norway
[4] Norwegian Res Ctr NORCE, Bergen Offshore Wind Ctr BOW, Bergen, Norway
关键词
analytical hierarchy process; multi-criteria decision analysis; optimal offshore wind farm siting; wind farm spatial planning; ENERGY; NORTH; MODEL;
D O I
10.1002/we.2871
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
The Norwegian government recently agreed on the goal 30by40, which involves opening Norwegian offshore areas to host 30 GW of installed wind power by 2040. We address this goal by presenting a first mapping of wind power suitability scores (WPSS) for the entire Norwegian economic zone (NEZ) using a multi-criteria decision analysis framework (MCDA), namely, the analytical hierarchical process (AHP) approach. We obtain WPSS considering relevant criteria like wind resources, techno-economic aspects, social acceptance, environmental considerations, and met-ocean constraints such as wind and wave conditions. The results starts with a baseline scenario, where the criterion importance is pairwise compared in the context of balancing economic incentives and conflicting interests. Additionally, to reveal regions that are robust to changes in criterion importance, we carry out a sensitivity analysis by introducing three additional scenarios. These scenarios represent stereotypical actors with distinct preferences for siting of wind farms: the investor, the environmentalist, and the fisherman. The results show that the southern part of the NEZ is the most suitable and robust region for offshore wind power deployment. This region receives the highest suitability category ("very high" suitability for wind power application) throughout all the scenarios. Areas in the Norwegian part of the Barents Sea and the near-coastal areas outside mid-Norway are also well suited regions, but these are more sensitive to the choice of criterion importance. The use of AHP within the framework of MCDA is shown to be a promising tool for pinpointing the best Norwegian offshore areas for wind power application.
引用
收藏
页码:5 / 32
页数:28
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]   Life cycle greenhouse gas emission from wind farms in reference to turbine sizes and capacity factors [J].
Bhandari, Ramchandra ;
Kumar, Bhunesh ;
Mayer, Felix .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 277
[2]   Capacity factor of wind power realized values vs. estimates [J].
Boccard, Nicolas .
ENERGY POLICY, 2009, 37 (07) :2679-2688
[3]   Temporally explicit and spatially resolved global offshore wind energy potentials [J].
Bosch, Jonathan ;
Staffell, Iain ;
Hawkes, Adam D. .
ENERGY, 2018, 163 :766-781
[4]   The Impact of a Reduced High-Wind Charnock Parameter on Wave Growth With Application to the North Sea, the Norwegian Sea, and the Arctic Ocean [J].
Breivik, Oyvind ;
Carrasco, Ana ;
Haakenstad, Hilde ;
Aarnes, Ole Johan ;
Behrens, Arno ;
Bidlot, Jean-Raymond ;
Bjorkqvist, Jan-Victor ;
Bohlinger, Patrik ;
Furevik, Birgitte R. ;
Staneva, Joanna ;
Reistad, Magnar .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-OCEANS, 2022, 127 (03)
[5]  
Brunelli M., 2015, Introduction to the Analytic Hierarchy Process
[6]   Multi-criteria selection of offshore wind farms: Case study for the Baltic States [J].
Chaouachi, Aymen ;
Covrig, Catalin Felix ;
Ardelean, Mircea .
ENERGY POLICY, 2017, 103 :179-192
[7]   A novel multi-criteria decision-making model to evaluate floating wind farm locations [J].
Diaz, H. ;
Guedes Soares, C. .
RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2022, 185 :431-454
[8]   A Multi-Criteria Approach to Evaluate Floating Offshore Wind Farms Siting in the Canary Islands (Spain) [J].
Diaz, Hugo ;
Soares, Carlos Guedes .
ENERGIES, 2021, 14 (04)
[9]   The Making of the New European Wind Atlas - Part 2: Production and evaluation [J].
Doerenkaemper, Martin ;
Olsen, Bjarke T. ;
Witha, Bjoern ;
Hahmann, Andrea N. ;
Davis, Neil N. ;
Barcons, Jordi ;
Ezber, Yasemin ;
Garcia-Bustamante, Elena ;
Fidel Gonzalez-Rouco, J. ;
Navarro, Jorge ;
Sastre-Marugan, Mariano ;
Sile, Tija ;
Trei, Wilke ;
Zagar, Mark ;
Badger, Jake ;
Gottschall, Julia ;
Sanz Rodrigo, Javier ;
Mann, Jakob .
GEOSCIENTIFIC MODEL DEVELOPMENT, 2020, 13 (10) :5079-5102
[10]  
ECMWF, 2020, CY41R1 ECMWF IFS 7, P114