Innovation effects of academic executives: Evidence from China

被引:52
作者
Ju, Xiaosheng [1 ]
Jiang, Shengjun [2 ]
Zhao, Qifeng [3 ]
机构
[1] Natl Univ Def Technol, Undergrad Coll, Changsha 410073, Hunan, Peoples R China
[2] Wuhan Univ, Econ & Management Sch, Wuhan 430072, Hubei, Peoples R China
[3] Chinese Acad Social Sci, Inst Quantitat & Technol Econ, Beijing 100732, Peoples R China
关键词
Corporate innovation; Academic executives; Research experience; Technological capability; China; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; UNIVERSITY-INDUSTRY COLLABORATION; CATCH-UP; TECHNOLOGICAL REGIMES; CORPORATE GOVERNANCE; KNOWLEDGE SPILLOVERS; ABSORPTIVE-CAPACITY; PROPENSITY SCORE; UPPER ECHELONS; FIRM;
D O I
10.1016/j.respol.2022.104711
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Since the 1980s, policy reforms have been undertaken in China to gradually promote entrepreneurship of aca-demic researchers. Based on manually collected data on academic executives (defined as either chairperson of the board or CEO, who had an academic title), we investigate the effects of academic executives on corporate technological capabilities and innovation performance among Chinese listed manufacturing firms from 2001 to 2015. Our results demonstrate that firms with academic executives are more likely to implement technological advancement strategies by increasing firm basic research, collaborating with outside institutions, and providing incentives to knowledge workers. Consequently, they have enhanced technological capabilities, as well as a higher quantity and quality of innovation output. In addition, firms with academic executives are more likely to have better financial performance regarding sales and profitability and keep a higher proportion of profits inside the firm to reinvest. The identification of the causal effects of academic executives relies on top executive turnover within firms and the propensity score matching strategy. Further analysis demonstrates that the effects of academic executives are more pronounced when they have a higher academic title, administrative experience, and a specialization in sciences. Our findings suggest that promoting entrepreneurship of academic researchers is an effective way of diffusing and utilizing knowledge, and it provides an internal driving force for the enhancement of corporate technological capabilities, which is crucial for technological catch-up of firms in latecomer countries.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 108 条
[1]   Bankruptcy Codes and Innovation [J].
Acharya, Viral V. ;
Subramanian, Krishnamurthy V. .
REVIEW OF FINANCIAL STUDIES, 2009, 22 (12) :4949-4988
[2]   Competition and innovation: An inverted-U relationship [J].
Aghion, P ;
Bloom, N ;
Blundell, R ;
Griffith, R ;
Howitt, P .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2005, 120 (02) :701-728
[3]  
Altonji JG, 2016, HBK ECON, V5, P305, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-444-63459-7.00007-5
[4]   The Economics of Director Heterogeneity [J].
Anderson, Ronald C. ;
Reeb, David M. ;
Upadhyay, Arun ;
Zhao, Wanli .
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT, 2011, 40 (01) :5-38
[5]  
Arora A., 2017, BACK BASICS WHY DO F, DOI [10.3386/w23187, DOI 10.3386/W23187]
[6]   Knowledge Spillovers and Corporate Investment in Scientific Research [J].
Arora, Ashish ;
Belenzon, Sharon ;
Sheer, Lia .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2021, 111 (03) :871-898
[7]   The decline of science in corporate R&D [J].
Arora, Ashish ;
Belenzon, Sharon ;
Patacconi, Andrea .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2018, 39 (01) :3-32
[8]   Entrepreneurial access and absorption of knowledge spillovers: Strategic board and managerial composition for competitive advantage [J].
Audretsch, DB ;
Lehmann, E .
JOURNAL OF SMALL BUSINESS MANAGEMENT, 2006, 44 (02) :155-166
[9]   Standardization in decentralized economies [J].
Auriol, E ;
Benaim, M .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2000, 90 (03) :550-570
[10]   Independent boards and innovation [J].
Balsmeier, Benjamin ;
Fleming, Lee ;
Manso, Gustavo .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2017, 123 (03) :536-557