A review of machine learning techniques for process and performance optimization in laser beam powder bed fusion additive manufacturing

被引:38
作者
Liu, Jia [1 ]
Ye, Jiafeng [1 ]
Izquierdo, Daniel Silva [1 ]
Vinel, Aleksandr [1 ]
Shamsaei, Nima [2 ]
Shao, Shuai [2 ]
机构
[1] Auburn Univ, Dept Ind & Syst Engn, Auburn, AL 36830 USA
[2] Auburn Univ, Dept Mech Engn, Auburn, AL 36830 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Machine learning; Laser beam powder bed fusion; Process and performance optimization; Process-structure-property relationships; Prediction accuracy; Interpretability; ARTIFICIAL-INTELLIGENCE; MECHANICAL-PROPERTIES; NEURAL-NETWORK; BLACK-BOX; SUPPORT; PREDICTION; PARAMETERS; REGRESSION; CHALLENGES; TI-6AL-4V;
D O I
10.1007/s10845-022-02012-0
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Laser beam powder bed fusion (LB-PBF) is a widely-used metal additive manufacturing process due to its high potential for fabrication flexibility and quality. Its process and performance optimization are key to improving product quality and promote further adoption of LB-PBF. In this article, the state-of-the-art machine learning (ML) applications for process and performance optimization in LB-PBF are reviewed. In these applications, ML is used to model the process-structure-property relationships in a data-driven way and optimize process parameters for high-quality fabrication. We review these applications in terms of their modeled relationships by ML (e.g., process-structure, process-property, or structure-property) and categorize the ML algorithms into interpretable ML, conventional ML, and deep ML according to interpretability and accuracy. This way may be particularly useful for practitioners as a comprehensive reference for selecting the ML algorithms according to the particular needs. It is observed that of the three types of ML above, conventional ML has been applied in process and performance optimization the most due to its balanced performance in terms of model accuracy and interpretability. To explore the power of ML in discovering new knowledge and insights, interpretation with additional steps is often needed for complex models arising from conventional ML and deep ML, such as model-agnostic methods or sensitivity analysis. In the future, enhancing the interpretability of ML, standardizing a systemic procedure for ML, and developing a collaborative platform to share data and findings will be critical to promote the integration of ML in LB-PBF applications on a large scale.
引用
收藏
页码:3249 / 3275
页数:27
相关论文
共 108 条
  • [1] Aboulkhair N.T., 2014, ADDIT MANUF, V1-4, P77, DOI [DOI 10.1016/J.ADDMA.2014.08.001, 10.1016/j.addma.2014.08.001]
  • [2] Peeking Inside the Black-Box: A Survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
    Adadi, Amina
    Berrada, Mohammed
    [J]. IEEE ACCESS, 2018, 6 : 52138 - 52160
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2000, REC STRENGTH AM LEAD
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2016, Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2020, Additive Manufacturing and Materials Market Growth, Trends, COVID-19 Impact, and Forecasts (2022-2027)
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2018, STRAT AM LEAD ADV MA
  • [7] [Anonymous], GLOBAL ADDITIVE MANU
  • [8] Simple method to construct process maps for additive manufacturing using a support vector machine
    Aoyagi, Kenta
    Wang, Hao
    Sudo, Hideki
    Chiba, Akihiko
    [J]. ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING, 2019, 27 : 353 - 362
  • [9] Representation Learning: A Review and New Perspectives
    Bengio, Yoshua
    Courville, Aaron
    Vincent, Pascal
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON PATTERN ANALYSIS AND MACHINE INTELLIGENCE, 2013, 35 (08) : 1798 - 1828
  • [10] Bishop C. M., 2007, Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning Information Science and Statistics, V1st