Project Robustness: Conceptualization, Measurement, and Implications for Decision Making

被引:2
作者
Zarghami, Seyed Ashkan [1 ]
机构
[1] Australian Natl Univ, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia
关键词
Decision-making; disruption; empirically based decision support system; project robustness; RESILIENCE; MANAGEMENT; NETWORKS; LESSONS;
D O I
10.1109/TEM.2024.3370090
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Recognizing the need for defining and measuring project robustness, the purpose of this article is threefold. First, it attempts to rigorously define the term "project robustness" based on the key characteristics of a robust project. Second, this paper aims to propose a measure of project robustness that aligns with the new definition. Third, using empirical evidence, this article illustrates how the new measure of robustness can make a difference to decision making in the project appraisal and execution phases. The results of this research highlight that robustness is more than a key property of resilience; rather, it is a multidimensional construct that includes a set of four necessary characteristics (i.e., resistance, stability, recoverability, and goal attainment) deemed vital to tackle disruptions. The results also demonstrate that how a combination of these characteristics can be integrated into decision making in the project management context. This article contributes to the research on decision making by mitigating optimism bias in projects, and transitioning from heuristic to analytic decision making. It achieves this by leveraging the relevant quantitative evidence regarding the disruption and recovery profile of a highly comparable project, thereby avoiding flawed judgments.
引用
收藏
页码:5757 / 5770
页数:14
相关论文
共 61 条
[1]   Assessing supply chain robustness to links failure [J].
Adenso-Diaz, Belarmino ;
Mar-Ortiz, Julio ;
Lozano, Sebastian .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 2018, 56 (15) :5104-5117
[2]   Supply chain resilience: a dynamic and multidimensional approach [J].
Adobor, Henry ;
McMullen, Ronald S. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LOGISTICS MANAGEMENT, 2018, 29 (04) :1451-1471
[3]   Measuring Robustness and Coverage of Transportation Networks with Multiple Routes and Hubs [J].
Auerbach, Jeremy ;
Kim, Hyun .
ANNALS OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF GEOGRAPHERS, 2022, 112 (06) :1741-1760
[4]   Construction and evaluation framework for a real-life project database [J].
Batselier, Jordy ;
Vanhoucke, Mario .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT, 2015, 33 (03) :697-710
[5]   Agile Projects in Nonagile Portfolios: How Project Portfolio Contingencies Constrain Agile Projects' Teamwork Quality [J].
Bechtel, Jadena ;
Kaufmann, Carsten ;
Kock, Alexander .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, 2022, 69 (06) :3514-3528
[6]  
Borrero S., 2017, Acad. Strategic Manage. J., V16, P244
[7]   Interdependency and Vulnerability of Multipartite Networks under Target Node Attacks [J].
Cai, Qing ;
Pratama, Mahardhika ;
Alam, Sameer .
COMPLEXITY, 2019, 2019
[8]   From Experience: The Agile-Stage-Gate Hybrid Model: A Promising New Approach and a New Research Opportunity [J].
Cooper, Robert G. ;
Sommer, Anita F. .
JOURNAL OF PRODUCT INNOVATION MANAGEMENT, 2016, 33 (05) :513-526
[9]   Organizational structure as a determinant of performance: Evidence from mutual funds [J].
Csaszar, Felipe A. .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2012, 33 (06) :611-632
[10]   TRYING TO BECOME A DIFFERENT TYPE OF COMPANY: DYNAMIC CAPABILITY AT SMITH CORONA [J].
Danneels, Erwin .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2011, 32 (01) :1-31