A flexible dose-response modeling framework based on continuous toxicity outcomes in phase I cancer clinical trials

被引:1
作者
Lee, Se Yoon [1 ]
机构
[1] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Stat, 3143 TAMU, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
关键词
Dose-response model; Continuous toxicity outcomes; Bayesian adaptive designs; Phase I cancer clinical trials; REASSESSMENT METHOD; ESCALATION; DESIGNS; REGRESSION;
D O I
10.1186/s13063-023-07793-0
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
BackgroundThe past few decades have seen remarkable developments in dose-finding designs for phase I cancer clinical trials. While many of these designs rely on a binary toxicity response, there is an increasing focus on leveraging continuous toxicity responses. A continuous toxicity response pertains to a quantitative measure represented by real numbers. A higher value corresponds not only to an elevated likelihood of side effects for patients but also to an increased probability of treatment efficacy. This relationship between toxicity and dose is often nonlinear, necessitating flexibility in the quest to find an optimal dose.MethodsA flexible, fully Bayesian dose-finding design is proposed to capitalize on continuous toxicity information, operating under the assumption that the true shape of the dose-toxicity curve is nonlinear.ResultsWe conduct simulations of clinical trials across varying scenarios of non-linearity to evaluate the operational characteristics of the proposed design. Additionally, we apply the proposed design to a real-world problem to determine an optimal dose for a molecularly targeted agent.ConclusionsPhase I cancer clinical trials, designed within a fully Bayesian framework with the utilization of continuous toxicity outcomes, offer an alternative approach to finding an optimal dose, providing unique benefits compared to trials designed based on binary toxicity outcomes.
引用
收藏
页数:25
相关论文
共 72 条
  • [41] MODEL-GUIDED DETERMINATION OF MAXIMUM TOLERATED DOSE IN PHASE-I CLINICAL-TRIALS - EVIDENCE FOR INCREASED PRECISION
    MICK, R
    RATAIN, MJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1993, 85 (03) : 217 - 223
  • [42] Neal RM, 2003, ANN STAT, V31, P705, DOI 10.1214/aos/1056562461
  • [43] Critical aspects of the Bayesian approach to phase I cancer trials
    Neuenschwander, Beat
    Branson, Michael
    Gsponer, Thomas
    [J]. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2008, 27 (13) : 2420 - 2439
  • [44] NIH, 2017, Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events v5.0
  • [45] Theoretical study of the continual reassessment method
    O'Quigley, J
    [J]. JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL PLANNING AND INFERENCE, 2006, 136 (06) : 1765 - 1780
  • [46] CONTINUAL REASSESSMENT METHOD - A PRACTICAL DESIGN FOR PHASE-1 CLINICAL-TRIALS IN CANCER
    OQUIGLEY, J
    PEPE, M
    FISHER, L
    [J]. BIOMETRICS, 1990, 46 (01) : 33 - 48
  • [47] Continual reassessment method: A likelihood approach
    OQuigley, JO
    Shen, LZ
    [J]. BIOMETRICS, 1996, 52 (02) : 673 - 684
  • [48] Adaptive designs in clinical trials: why use them, and how to run and report them
    Pallmann, Philip
    Bedding, Alun W.
    Choodari-Oskooei, Babak
    Dimairo, Munyaradzi
    Flight, Laura
    Hampson, Lisa V.
    Holmes, Jane
    Mander, Adrian P.
    Odondi, Lang'O
    Sydes, Matthew R.
    Villar, Sofia S.
    Wason, James M. S.
    Weir, Christopher J.
    Wheeler, Graham M.
    Yap, Christina
    Jaki, Thomas
    [J]. BMC MEDICINE, 2018, 16
  • [49] Phase I studies of chemotherapeutic agents in cancer patients: A review of the designs
    Potter, Douglas M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BIOPHARMACEUTICAL STATISTICS, 2006, 16 (05) : 579 - 604
  • [50] STATISTICAL AND ETHICAL ISSUES IN THE DESIGN AND CONDUCT OF PHASE-I AND PHASE-II CLINICAL-TRIALS OF NEW ANTICANCER AGENTS
    RATAIN, MJ
    MICK, R
    SCHILSKY, RL
    SIEGLER, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1993, 85 (20) : 1637 - 1643