Can a 3 months treatment with oral Desogestrel prior to insertion of the etonogestrel-releasing contraceptive implant improve continuation rate at 1 year? A randomized trial

被引:0
作者
Fah, ValeriaLombardi [1 ]
Catarino, Rosa [1 ]
Castillo, Sarah [2 ]
Badda, Maria [3 ]
Gezer-Dickschat, Sibel [4 ]
Thieringer, Friederike [4 ]
Tschudin, Sibil [4 ]
Viviano, Manuela [1 ]
Yaron, Michal [1 ]
机构
[1] Geneva Univ Hosp, Dept Woman Child & Adolescent, Serv Gynecol, Blvd Cluse 30, CH-1205 Geneva, Switzerland
[2] Hosp Neuchatel Pourtales, Serv Gynecol & Obstet, Rue Maladiere 45, CH-2000 Neuchatel, Switzerland
[3] GHOL Hosp Nyon, Serv Gynecol & Obstet, Chemin Monastier 10, CH-1260 Nyon, Switzerland
[4] Univ Hosp Basel, Serv Gynecol & Obstet, Univ Spital CH,Petersgraben 4, CH-4031 Basel, Switzerland
关键词
Desogestrel pill; Discontinuation; Long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARC); Tolerance; Etonogestrel-releasing contraceptive implant; SAFETY; EFFICACY;
D O I
10.1186/s13104-023-06304-3
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
ObjectiveTo evaluate if daily oral 75 mu g of Desogestrel (DSG) for 3 months prior to the insertion of etonogestrel-releasing contraceptive implant (ENG-IMPLANT) might help reduce its premature discontinuation.ResultsA total of 66 women were randomized in the ENG-IMPLANT group (26) and in the DSG + ENG-IMPLANT group (40), respectively, in the Geneva University Hospitals and Basel University Hospital, from August 15th, 2016 through September 30th, 2019. In the DSG + ENG-IMPLANT group, patients were given a 3 months' supply of 75 mu g of DSG before the insertion of the ENG-IMPLANT. All women were seen after 3 months for bleeding and satisfaction evaluation, and at 12 months post ENG-IMPLANT insertion. Higher levels of satisfaction at 12-months were found in the ENG-IMPLANT group compared to the DSG + ENG-IMPLANT group (8.5 +/- 1.7 vs. 6.6 +/- 2.9, p = 0.012). There were no statistically significant differences regarding tolerance (7.8 +/- 2.5 vs 6.8 +/- 2.6, p = 0.191) and contraceptive continuation (80% vs 72.4%, p = 0.544) between groups.ConclusionDSG prior to insertion of the ENG-IMPLANT did not improve its continuation rate neither its satisfaction at 1 year.Trial registration NCT05174195. Retrospectively registered, the 30th December 2021
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]   Satisfaction With the Intrauterine Device Insertion Procedure Among Adolescent and Young Adult Women [J].
Akers, Aletha Y. ;
Harding, Jennifer ;
Perriera, Lisa K. ;
Schreiber, Courtney ;
Garcia-Espana, J. Felipe ;
Sonalkar, Sarita .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2018, 131 (06) :1130-1136
[2]   Tolerability and clinical safety of Implanon® [J].
Blumenthal, Paul D. ;
Gemzell-Danielsson, Kristina ;
Marintcheva-Petrova, Maya .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CONTRACEPTION AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH CARE, 2008, 13 :29-36
[3]   A multicentre efficacy and safety study of the single contraceptive implant Implanon® [J].
Croxatto, HB ;
Urbancsek, J ;
Massai, R ;
Bennink, HC ;
van Beek, A .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 1999, 14 (04) :976-981
[4]   Safety and efficacy of a single-rod etonogestrel implant (Implanon): results from 11 international clinical trials [J].
Darney, Philip ;
Patel, Ashlesha ;
Rosen, Kimberly ;
Shapiro, Lena S. ;
Kaunitz, Andrew M. .
FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2009, 91 (05) :1646-1653
[5]   Implantable contraceptives for women: effectiveness, discontinuation rates, return of fertility, and outcome of pregnancies [J].
Glasier, A .
CONTRACEPTION, 2002, 65 (01) :29-37
[6]   CEU New Product Review of the desogestrel-only pill [J].
Guillebaud, J .
JOURNAL OF FAMILY PLANNING AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH CARE, 2004, 30 (01) :64-64
[7]   Continuation rates and reasons for removal among Implanon® users accessing two family planning clinics in Queensland, Australia [J].
Harvey, Caroline ;
Seib, Charrlotte ;
Lucke, Jayne .
CONTRACEPTION, 2009, 80 (06) :527-532
[8]  
National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (Great Britain) Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (Great Britain) National Collaborating Centre for Women's and Children's Health (Great Britain), 2005, LONG ACT REV CONTR E
[9]  
Taylor D., 2019, CONTRACEPT X, V1, DOI [10.1016/j.conx.2019.100008, DOI 10.1016/J.CONX.2019.100008]
[10]   RETRACTED: An integrated analysis of nonmenstrual adverse events with Implanon® (Retracted Article) [J].
Urbancsek, J .
CONTRACEPTION, 1998, 58 (06) :109S-115S