Neck shaft angle in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: 135 vs. 145 degrees at minimum 2-year follow-up

被引:9
作者
Neyton, Lionel [1 ,2 ]
Nigues, Ana [1 ]
McBride, Andrew P. [1 ]
de Sanctis, Edoardo Giovannetti [1 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Prive Jean Mermoz, Ramsay Sante, Ctr Orthope Santy, Lyon, France
[2] Ctr Orthoped Santy, 24 Ave Paul St, F-69008 Lyon, France
关键词
Reverse shoulder arthroplasty; Scapular notching; Neck shaft angle; 135; degrees; 145; Lateralization; Inferiorization; ROTATOR CUFF DEFICIENCY; SCAPULAR IMPINGEMENT; GLENOSPHERE DESIGN; RANGE; POSITION; MOTION; COMPLICATIONS; PROSTHESIS; ABDUCTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jse.2022.12.014
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The most common complication with reverse shoulder arthroplasty Grammont based design with a 155 degrees neck shaft angle (NSA) is scapular notching. Scapular notching has been associated with reduced clinical outcomes. Reducing the humeral NSA from 155 degrees has been shown to reduce the incidence of scapular notching however it is unknown whether there is a difference in scapular notch-ing between a 145 degrees and 135 degrees NSA. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of decreasing the NSA on scapular notching rate and postoperative range of motion comparing 145 degrees and 135 degrees NSA stems at minimum 2 yr of follow-up.Methods: Consecutive patients undergoing primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty with a NSA of either 145 degrees or 135 degrees between January 2014 and February 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were included if they were over the age of 18, had minimum clinical follow-up of 24 mo with true postoperative anteroposterior radiographic view.Results: One hundred and three patients were included for the final analysis: 73 with a 145 degrees NSA and 30 with a 135 degrees NSA stem. The mean age and mean follow-up were respectively 70.9 yr (range, 52.0-89.0) and 32.1 mo. The overall incidence of scapular notching was 46.6 %. There was a statistically significant difference in scapular notching between the 145 degrees (53.4%) and 135 degrees (30%) NSA groups (P = .028). There was no difference in terms of postoperative Constant-Murley Score (mean, 66.1 vs. 68.2; P = .395), Subjective Shoul-der Value (mean, 76.5 vs. 83.1%, P = .167), forward flexion (mean, 140 degrees vs. 142 degrees, P = .704), abduction (mean, 123.2 degrees vs. 121.5 degrees, P = .771), external rotation with the arm at the side (mean, 34.1 degrees vs. 37.3 degrees, P = .341) and internal rotation (mean, 5.3 vs. 5.4 pts P = .336) between the 2 groups.Conclusion: This is the first study to compare the effect of a 145 degrees vs. 135 degrees NSA on scapular notching rates. The key finding of this study is that scapular notching rate was significantly reduced from 53% to 30% in 135 degrees NSA compared to 145 degrees NSA, after at least 24 mo of follow-up. Our data also show that glenoid lateralization and inferiorization has an influence on scapular notching. We are unable to state that the reduced scapular notching rate was due to a reduction in NSA alone. Despite a lower rate of scapular notching, the 135 degrees NSA group has not shown any significant better clinical and functional outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:1486 / 1493
页数:8
相关论文
共 41 条
[21]   Adjusting Implant Size and Position Can Improve Internal Rotation After Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty in a Three-dimensional Computational Model [J].
Huish, Eric G., Jr. ;
Athwal, George S. ;
Neyton, Lionel ;
Walch, Gilles .
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2021, 479 (01) :198-204
[22]   Effect of humeral stem design on humeral position and range of motion in reverse shoulder arthroplasty [J].
Laedermann, Alexandre ;
Denard, Patrick J. ;
Boileau, Pascal ;
Farron, Alain ;
Deransart, Pierric ;
Terrier, Alexandre ;
Ston, Julien ;
Walch, Gilles .
INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2015, 39 (11) :2205-2213
[23]   Scapular Notching on Kinematic Simulated Range of Motion After Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Is Not the Result of Impingement in Adduction [J].
Laedermann, Alexandre ;
Gueorguiev, Boyko ;
Charbonnier, Caecilia ;
Stimec, Bojan V. ;
Fasel, Jean H. D. ;
Zderic, Ivan ;
Hagen, Jennifer ;
Walch, Gilles .
MEDICINE, 2015, 94 (38)
[24]   Scapular Notching in Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty: Is It Important to Avoid It and How? [J].
Levigne, Christophe ;
Garret, Jerome ;
Boileau, Pascal ;
Alami, Ghassan ;
Favard, Luc ;
Walch, Gilles .
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2011, 469 (09) :2512-2520
[25]   Scapular notching in reverse shoulder arthroplasty [J].
Levigne, Christophe ;
Boileau, Pascal ;
Favard, Luc ;
Garaud, Pascal ;
Mole, Daniel ;
Sirveaux, Francois ;
Walch, Gilles .
JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2008, 17 (06) :925-935
[26]   Inferior Glenosphere Placement Reduces Scapular Notching in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty [J].
Li, Xinning ;
Dines, Joshua S. ;
Warren, Russell F. ;
Craig, Edward V. ;
Dines, David M. .
ORTHOPEDICS, 2015, 38 (02) :E88-E93
[27]   Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humerus fractures: Is the glenoid implant problematic? [J].
Lignel, Arthur ;
Berhouet, Julien ;
Loirat, Marc-Alexandre ;
Collin, Philippe ;
Thomazeau, Herve ;
Gallinet, David ;
Boileau, Pascal ;
Favard, Luc .
ORTHOPAEDICS & TRAUMATOLOGY-SURGERY & RESEARCH, 2018, 104 (06) :773-777
[28]   Scapular Notching: Recognition and Strategies to Minimize Clinical Impact [J].
Nicholson, Gregory P. ;
Strauss, Eric J. ;
Sherman, Seth L. .
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2011, 469 (09) :2521-2530
[29]   Biomechanical effects of humeral neck-shaft angle and subscapularis integrity in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty [J].
Oh, Joo Han ;
Shin, Sang-Jin ;
McGarry, Michelle H. ;
Scott, Jonathan H. ;
Heckmann, Nathanael ;
Lee, Thay Q. .
JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2014, 23 (08) :1091-1098
[30]   Inferior tilt of the glenoid leads to medialization and increases impingement on the scapular neck in reverse shoulder arthroplasty [J].
Patel, Midhat ;
Martin, John R. ;
Campbell, David H. ;
Fernandes, Renan R. ;
Amini, Michael H. .
JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2021, 30 (06) :1273-1281