Assessing the preference and spatial dependence of a solid waste management system in Nepal: A choice experiment approach

被引:7
作者
Rahman, Mohammad Mashiur [1 ,2 ]
Bohara, Alok K. [2 ]
机构
[1] No Arizona Univ, WA Franke Coll Business, 101 E McConnell Dr, Flagstaff, AZ 86011 USA
[2] Univ New Mexico, Dept Econ, 1915 Roma Ave NE, Albuquerque, NM 87131 USA
关键词
Solid waste management; Choice experiment; Willingness to pay; Generalized multinomial logit model (GMNL); Sanitary landfill; Spatial analysis; Nepal; WILLINGNESS-TO-PAY; RESPONDENT UNCERTAINTY; PUBLIC PREFERENCES; DISCRETE-CHOICE; DISTANCE-DECAY; DISPOSAL; MUNICIPALITY; SERVICES; MODEL; WANT;
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116805
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This study deploys a choice experiment method to estimate the preference and willingness to pay for a better solid waste management system in Siddharthanagar municipality in Nepal. A primary survey of 611 households was conducted, and the results from the Generalized Multinomial Logit Model (GMNL) indicate a public pref-erence for a better waste management service. Significant heterogeneity in household preferences is evident after accommodating each choice selection's preference certainty in the GMNL model. On average, households prefer to pay the highest amount for constructing and maintaining a sanitary landfill, which is Nepalese Rupee (NPR) 158/month (USD 1.43). The geographic distribution of the marginal willingness to pay (MWTP) by hot spot analysis from the geocoded location also indicates spatial heterogeneity across the study area. The MWTP for each waste management attribute is spatially autocorrelated, and household awareness and attitude significantly impact this spatial dependence. Overall, both the choice models result and spatial analyses indicate the policy should be targeted at a localized level to increase awareness concerning the proper management of solid waste.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 65 条
  • [1] Spatial preference heterogeneity in forest recreation
    Abildtrup, Jens
    Garcia, Serge
    Olsen, Soren Boye
    Stenger, Anne
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2013, 92 : 67 - 77
  • [2] Ackerman F., 2000, Local Environment, V5, P223, DOI DOI 10.1080/13549830050009373
  • [3] Willingness to pay for waste management improvement in Dhaka city, Bangladesh
    Afroz, Rafia
    Hanaki, Keisuke
    Hasegawa-Kurisu, Kiyo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2009, 90 (01) : 492 - 503
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2018, Greenhouse Gas Emissions
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2013, Solid Waste Management in Nepal: Current Status and Policy Recommendations
  • [6] Anselin L, 1998, STAT TEXTB MONOG, V155, P237
  • [7] Babs-Shomoye F., 2016, J PUBLIC HLTH DEV CO, V2, P268
  • [8] A SIMPLE-MODEL OF HERD BEHAVIOR
    BANERJEE, AV
    [J]. QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1992, 107 (03) : 797 - 817
  • [9] The aggregation of environmental benefit values: Welfare measures, distance decay and total WTP
    Bateman, Ian J.
    Day, Brett H.
    Georgiou, Stavros
    Lake, Iain
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2006, 60 (02) : 450 - 460
  • [10] Bhattarai Kumar, 2015, Environment and Natural Resources Journal, V13, P14