Statistical methods for exploring spontaneous adverse event reporting databases for drug-host factor interactions

被引:7
|
作者
Lu, Zhiyuan [1 ]
Suzuki, Ayako [2 ,3 ]
Wang, Dong [1 ]
机构
[1] US FDA, Natl Ctr Toxicol Res, Div Bioinformat & Biostat, Jefferson, AR 72079 USA
[2] Duke Univ, Div Gastroenterol, Durham, NC USA
[3] Durham VA Med Ctr, Dept Med, Durham, NC USA
关键词
Drug-host factor interactions; Likelihood ratio tests; FAERS; Postmarket surveillance; Spontaneous reporting adverse event databases; SIGNAL-DETECTION; RATIO; FREQUENCY; GENDER;
D O I
10.1186/s12874-023-01885-w
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundDrug toxicity does not affect patients equally; the toxicity may only exert in patients who possess certain attributes of susceptibility to specific drug properties (i.e., drug-host interaction). This concept is crucial for personalized drug safety but remains under-studied, primarily due to methodological challenges and limited data availability. By monitoring a large volume of adverse event reports in the postmarket stage, spontaneous adverse event reporting systems provide an unparalleled resource of information for adverse events and could be utilized to explore risk disparities of specific adverse events by age, sex, and other host factors. However, well-formulated statistical methods to formally address such risk disparities are currently lacking.MethodsIn this paper, we present a statistical framework to explore spontaneous adverse event reporting databases for drug-host interactions and detect risk disparities in adverse drug events by various host factors, adapting methods for safety signal detection. We proposed four different methods, including likelihood ratio test, normal approximation test, and two tests using subgroup ratios. We applied our proposed methods to simulated data and Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Adverse Event Reporting Systems (FAERS) and explored sex-/age-disparities in reported liver events associated with specific drug classes.ResultsThe simulation result demonstrates that two tests (likelihood ratio, normal approximation) can detect disparities in adverse drug events associated with host factors while controlling the family wise error rate. Application to real data on drug liver toxicity shows that the proposed method can be used to detect drugs with unusually high level of disparity regarding a host factor (sex or age) for liver toxicity or to determine whether an adverse event demonstrates a significant unbalance regarding the host factor relative to other events for the drug.ConclusionThough spontaneous adverse event reporting databases require careful data processing and inference, the sheer size of the databases with diverse data from different countries provides unique resources for exploring various questions for drug safety that are otherwise impossible to address. Our proposed methods can be used to facilitate future investigation on drug-host interactions in drug toxicity using a large number of reported adverse events.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Statistical methods for exploring spontaneous adverse event reporting databases for drug-host factor interactions
    Zhiyuan Lu
    Ayako Suzuki
    Dong Wang
    BMC Medical Research Methodology, 23
  • [2] Model driven method for exploring individual and confounding effects in spontaneous adverse event reporting databases
    Lv, Bo
    Li, Yuedong
    Shi, Aiming
    Pan, Jie
    EXPERT OPINION ON DRUG SAFETY, 2024, 23 (09) : 1173 - 1181
  • [3] An adverse drug event manager facilitates spontaneous reporting of adverse drug reactions
    Vinther, Siri
    Klarskov, Pia
    Borgeskov, Hanne
    Darso, Perle
    Christophersen, Anette Kvindebjerg
    Borck, Bille
    Christensen, Catrine
    Hansen, Melissa Voigt
    Halladin, Natalie Monica Lovland
    Christensen, Mikkel Bring
    Harboe, Kirstine Moll
    Lund, Marie
    Jimenez-Solem, Espen
    DANISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2017, 64 (01):
  • [4] Identifying Adverse Drug Reactions Associated with Drug-Drug Interactions: Comparison of Data Mining of Spontaneous Reporting Databases
    Skvrce, N. Mirosevic
    Sarinic, V. Macolic
    Krnic, D.
    Tomic, S.
    Mucalo, I.
    Bozina, N.
    DRUG SAFETY, 2011, 34 (10) : 910 - 910
  • [5] Polypharmacy in three different spontaneous adverse drug event databases
    Mabuchi, Takayuki
    Hosomi, Kouichi
    Yokoyama, Satoshi
    Takada, Mitsutaka
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY AND THERAPEUTICS, 2020, 58 (11) : 601 - 607
  • [7] Adverse drug reaction or innocent bystander? A systematic comparison of statistical discovery methods for spontaneous reporting systems
    Dijkstra, Louis
    Garling, Marco
    Foraita, Ronja
    Pigeot, Iris
    PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2020, 29 (04) : 396 - 403
  • [8] Comparison of Statistical Signal Detection Methods Within and Across Spontaneous Reporting Databases
    Gianmario Candore
    Kristina Juhlin
    Katrin Manlik
    Bharat Thakrar
    Naashika Quarcoo
    Suzie Seabroke
    Antoni Wisniewski
    Jim Slattery
    Drug Safety, 2015, 38 : 577 - 587
  • [9] Comparison of Statistical Signal Detection Methods Within and Across Spontaneous Reporting Databases
    Candore, Gianmario
    Juhlin, Kristina
    Manlik, Katrin
    Thakrar, Bharat
    Quarcoo, Naashika
    Seabroke, Suzie
    Wisniewski, Antoni
    Slattery, Jim
    DRUG SAFETY, 2015, 38 (06) : 577 - 587
  • [10] Estimating time-to-onset of adverse drug reactions from spontaneous reporting databases
    Leroy, Fanny
    Dauxois, Jean-Yves
    Theophile, Helene
    Haramburu, Francoise
    Tubert-Bitter, Pascale
    BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2014, 14