Understanding the Fate of Jug Bay Tidal Freshwater Marshes Under Current Relative Sea Level Rise Conditions

被引:1
作者
Delgado, P. [1 ]
Howard, N. [2 ]
Waters, D. [3 ]
机构
[1] Jug Bay Wetlands Sanctuary, 1361 Wrighton Rd, Lothian, MD 20711 USA
[2] Maryland Dept Environm, 1800 Washington Blvd, Baltimore, MD 21230 USA
[3] St Marys Coll Maryland, 47645 Coll Dr, St Marys City, MD 20686 USA
关键词
Tidal freshwater marsh; Surface elevation change; Vertical accretion; Shoreline change; Marsh upland migration; Jug Bay-Patuxent River; MID-ATLANTIC COAST; SALT-MARSH; SEDIMENT DEPOSITION; ELEVATION CHANGE; CLIMATE-CHANGE; SHORT-TERM; LONG-TERM; ACCRETION; WETLAND; RESPONSES;
D O I
10.1007/s12237-024-01328-9
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Tidal freshwater marshes (TFMs), found in the upper tidal reaches of river estuaries, are characterized by high diversity and productivity. These ecosystems are threatened by climate change, but unlike other coastal wetlands, there is a lack of information about the impact and their response to this threat. To understand the resilience of Jug Bay TFMs to sea level rise (SLR), surface elevation change was measured in low and mid-high marsh areas along primary and secondary channels. Elevation change exhibited significant temporal and spatial variability. A marked seasonality showed higher elevation during the growing season, and episodic storms altered elevation trajectories. Spatially, elevation change was significantly affected by channel category and marsh zone. Low marsh along primary channels lost elevation (-11.57 mm year-1), while the mid-high marsh gained elevation (+2.65 mm year-1). In secondary channels, both low (+11.29 mm year-1) and mid-high marshes (+5.43 mm year-1) gained elevation. A shoreline change analysis for the Patuxent and Western Branch rivers (2007-2018) showed change rates between -0.35 and -0.90 m year-1. A 2019 upland migration study indicated that most TFMs studied are not able to migrate due to steep slopes. Overall, marsh in more protected areas, along secondary channels, are more resilient, while low marsh in primary channels the most vulnerable to SLR. With low upland migration potential, studied marshes have to rely mainly on vertical elevation gain to keep up with SLR. If restoration is considered in this system, it should focus on the vulnerable low marsh zones along primary channels.
引用
收藏
页码:1857 / 1876
页数:20
相关论文
共 104 条
[1]  
Baldwin A.H., 2009, Tidal Freshwater Wetlands, P1
[2]  
Baldwin AH, 2001, WETLANDS, V21, P519, DOI 10.1672/0277-5212(2001)021[0519:HCAVOT]2.0.CO
[3]  
2
[4]   Tidal Freshwater Wetlands: Variation and Changes [J].
Barendregt, Aat ;
Swarth, Christopher W. .
ESTUARIES AND COASTS, 2013, 36 (03) :445-456
[5]   Tidal Marshes across a Chesapeake Bay Subestuary Are Not Keeping up with Sea-Level Rise [J].
Beckett, Leah H. ;
Baldwin, Andrew H. ;
Kearney, Michael S. .
PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (07)
[6]  
Biggs R.B., 1988, Ecology and Restoration of the Delaware River Basin, P116
[7]   Processes Influencing Marsh Elevation Change in Low- and High-Elevation Zones of a Temperate Salt Marsh [J].
Blum, Linda K. ;
Christian, Robert R. ;
Cahoon, Donald R. ;
Wiberg, Patricia L. .
ESTUARIES AND COASTS, 2021, 44 (03) :818-833
[8]   Sediment Deposition and Accretion Rates in Tidal Marshes Are Highly Variable Along Estuarine Salinity and Flooding Gradients [J].
Butzeck, C. ;
Eschenbach, A. ;
Groengroeft, A. ;
Hansen, K. ;
Nolte, S. ;
Jensen, K. .
ESTUARIES AND COASTS, 2015, 38 (02) :434-450
[9]   Elevation-dependent surface elevation gain in a tidal freshwater marsh and implications for marsh persistence [J].
Cadol, Daniel ;
Engelhardt, Katharina ;
Elmore, Andrew ;
Sanders, Geoffrey .
LIMNOLOGY AND OCEANOGRAPHY, 2014, 59 (03) :1065-1080
[10]   A review of major storm impacts on coastal wetland elevations [J].
Cahoon, Donal R. .
ESTUARIES AND COASTS, 2006, 29 (6A) :889-898