Segmental bile duct resection versus pancreatoduodenectomy for middle and distal third bile duct cancer. A systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies

被引:2
|
作者
Fleming, Andrew M. [1 ,8 ]
Phillips, Alisa L. [2 ]
Hendrick, Leah E. [1 ]
Drake, Justin A. [3 ]
Dickson, Paxton V. [4 ]
Glazer, Evan S. [4 ]
Shibata, David [4 ]
Cleary, Sean P. [5 ]
Yakoub, Danny [6 ]
Deneve, Jeremiah L. [7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tennessee, Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Surg, Memphis, TN USA
[2] Univ Tennessee, Coll Med, Hlth Sci Ctr, Memphis, TN USA
[3] H Lee Moffitt Canc Ctr & Res Inst, Div Gastrointestinal Oncol, Tampa, FL USA
[4] Univ Tennessee, Hlth Sci Ctr, Div Surg Oncol, Memphis, TN USA
[5] Mayo Clin, Div Hepatobiliary & Pancreas Surg, Rochester, MN USA
[6] Augusta Univ, Med Ctr, Div Surg Oncol, Augusta, GA USA
[7] Univ North Carolina Chapel Hill, Div Surg Oncol, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[8] Univ Tennessee, Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Surg, 910 Madison Ave, Memphis, TN 38163 USA
关键词
SURGICAL MARGIN STATUS; PROGNOSTIC-FACTORS; SURVIVAL; IMPACT; CHOLANGIOCARCINOMA; RECURRENCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.hpb.2023.06.012
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: Data regarding oncologic outcomes of segmental bile duct resection (SBDR) versus pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) for bile duct cancers (BDC) are conflicting. We compared SBDR and PD for BDC utilizing pooled data analysis.Materials and methods: A comprehensive PRISMA 2020 systematic review was performed. Studies comparing SBDR with PD for BDC were included. Pooled mean differences (MD), odds ratios (OR), and risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. Subgroup analyses were performed. Study quality, bias, heterogeneity, and certainty were analyzed.Results: Twelve studies from 2004 to 2021 were included, comprising 533 SBDR and 1,313 PD. SBDR was associated with positive proximal duct margins (OR 1.56; CI 1.11-2.18; P = .01), and distal duct margins (OR 43.25; CI 10.38-180.16; P < .01). SBDR yielded fewer lymph nodes (MD -6.93 nodes; CI -9.72-4.15; P < .01) and detected fewer nodal metastases (OR 0.72; CI 0.55-0.94; P = .01). SBDR portended less perioperative morbidity (OR 0.31; CI 0.21-0.46; P < .01), but not mortality (OR 0.52; CI 0.20-1.32; P = .17). SBDR was associated with locoregional recurrences (OR 1.88; CI 1.01-3.53; P = .02), and lymph node recurrences (OR 2.13; CI 1.42-3.2; P = .04). SBDR yielded decreased 5-year OS (OR 0.75; CI 0.65-0.85; P < .01).Conclusions: Despite decreased perioperative morbidity, SBDR appears to provide inferior oncologic control for BDC.
引用
收藏
页码:1288 / 1299
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Are Metal Stents Better Than Plastic Stents for Malignant Distal Common Bile Duct Stricture? a Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review.
    Moole, Harsha
    Puli, Srinivas R.
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2015, 81 (05) : AB202 - AB202
  • [42] Systematic review and meta-analysis of intraoperative versus preoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy in patients with gallbladder and suspected common bile duct stones
    Gurusamy, K.
    Sahay, S. J.
    Burroughs, A. K.
    Davidson, B. R.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2011, 98 (07) : 908 - 916
  • [43] Risk factors for bile duct injury after laparoscopic cholecystectomy A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis
    Dong, Chang-Cheng
    Jiang, Xue-Jun
    Shi, Xue-Ying
    Li, Bing
    Chen, Liang
    MEDICINE, 2021, 100 (49)
  • [44] Systematic review with meta-analysis of studies comparing primary duct closure and T-tube drainage after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration for choledocholithiasis
    Podda, Mauro
    Polignano, Francesco Maria
    Luhmann, Andreas
    Wilson, Michael Samuel James
    Kulli, Christoph
    Tait, Iain Stephen
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2016, 30 (03): : 845 - 861
  • [45] Systematic review with meta-analysis of studies comparing primary duct closure and T-tube drainage after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration for choledocholithiasis
    Mauro Podda
    Francesco Maria Polignano
    Andreas Luhmann
    Michael Samuel James Wilson
    Christoph Kulli
    Iain Stephen Tait
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2016, 30 : 845 - 861
  • [46] Meta-analysis of laparoscopic transcystic versus transcholedochal common bile duct exploration for choledocholithiasis
    Bekheit, M.
    Smith, R.
    Ramsay, G.
    Soggiu, F.
    Ghazanfar, M.
    Ahmed, I.
    BJS OPEN, 2019, 3 (03): : 242 - 251
  • [47] Bile leakage test in liver resection:A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Hai-Qing Wang
    Jian Yang
    Jia-Yin Yang
    Lu-Nan Yan
    World Journal of Gastroenterology, 2013, (45) : 8420 - 8426
  • [48] Bile leakage test in liver resection: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wang, Hai-Qing
    Yang, Jian
    Yang, Jia-Yin
    Yan, Lu-Nan
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2013, 19 (45) : 8420 - 8426
  • [49] Comparative Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Versus Open Pancreatoduodenectomy in Distal Cholangiocarcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Domene, Sabrina
    Flores, Manuel Quiroz
    Fulginiti, Daniela
    Garcia, Karem D. Thomas
    Woldehana, Nathnael Abera
    Jimenez, Karleska M. Nunez
    Herrarte, Victor M. Lagos
    Benavides, Jose A. Guevara
    Perdomo, Carlos R. Alegria
    Estrella-Gaibor, Cesar
    Arruarana, Victor Sebastian
    Ramirez, Marily Martinez
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 16 (04)
  • [50] Distal versus total gastrectomy for middle and lower-third gastric cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Li, Zhengyan
    Bai, Bin
    Xie, Fengni
    Zhao, Qingchuan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2018, 53 : 163 - 170