Combined multiple regional anesthesia for microwave ablation of liver Tumors: Initial experience

被引:0
|
作者
Wang, Lu [1 ]
Lu, Man [1 ]
Wang, Shishi [2 ]
Wu, Xiaobo [1 ]
Tan, Bo [1 ]
Xu, Jinshun [1 ]
Zou, Jie [1 ]
He, Yi [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Elect Sci & Technol China, Affiliated Canc Hosp, Sichuan Canc Ctr, Ultrasound Med Ctr,Sichuan Clin Res Ctr Canc,Sichu, Chengdu 610041, Peoples R China
[2] Chengdu Univ Tradit Chinese Med, Sch Med & Life Sci, Chengdu 610075, Peoples R China
关键词
Combined; Regional anesthesia; Pain control; Microwave ablation; Liver tumors; PERCUTANEOUS RADIOFREQUENCY ABLATION; THORACIC PARAVERTEBRAL ANESTHESIA; HEPATOCELLULAR CARCINOMAS; BLOCK; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejrad.2023.111147
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objective: This study aims to assess the feasibility and safety of combined multiple regional anesthesia (CMRA) as a potential strategy to decrease pain and reliance on intravenous analgesics during and after ultrasound-guided microwave ablation (US-guided-MWA) of liver tumors.Methods: A cohort of 75 patients with a total of 99 liver tumors who underwent US-guided-MWA of liver tumors were enrolled. These patients were randomly allocated into three groups: A, B, and C. Prior to the ablation procedure, Group A patients received a combination of hepatic hilar block (HHB), Transversus abdominis plane block (TAPB), and local anesthesia (LA). Patients in Group B were administered HHB in conjunction with LA, while those in Group C received TAPB and LA. Evaluative parameters included the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) scores, consumption of morphine, incidence of complications, and factors influencing perioperative pain.Results: All patients successfully underwent US-guided-MWA. The peak NRS scores for pain during ablation across the three groups were 2.36 +/- 1.19, 3.28 +/- 1.59, and 4.24 +/- 1.42 respectively (P < 0.01), while the count of patients requiring morphine were 4/25, 8/25, and 13/25 respectively (P < 0.01). Postoperative NRS scores for the three groups at 4, 8, 12, 24, and 36-hour intervals demonstrated a pattern of initial increase followed by a decrease, with the order at each interval being: Group A < Group C < Group B. Factors associated with increased pain included larger tumor size, greater number of tumors, and longer procedure and ablation time (P < 0.05). No major complications were recorded across the three groups.Conclusion: CMRA offers an effective and safe modality to manage pain during and after US-guided-MWA of liver tumors.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Safety of CT-Guided Microwave Ablation of Subcardiac Liver Tumors
    William Johnson
    Adam Weekley
    Pilar Suz
    Nainesh Parikh
    Ghassan El-Haddad
    Rahul Mhaskar
    Bela Kis
    CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology, 2022, 45 : 1693 - 1700
  • [42] On the Design of a Microwave Imaging System to Monitor Thermal Ablation of Liver Tumors
    Wang, Mengchu
    Crocco, Lorenzo
    Cavagnaro, Marta
    IEEE JOURNAL OF ELECTROMAGNETICS RF AND MICROWAVES IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2021, 5 (03): : 231 - 237
  • [43] Composite Configuration Interventional Therapy Robot for the Microwave Ablation of Liver Tumors
    YingYu Cao
    Long Xue
    BoJin Qi
    LiPei Jiang
    ShuangCheng Deng
    Ping Liang
    Jia Liu
    Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2017, 30 (06) : 1416 - 1425
  • [44] Composite Configuration Interventional Therapy Robot for the Microwave Ablation of Liver Tumors
    Ying-Yu Cao
    Long Xue
    Bo-Jin Qi
    Li-Pei Jiang
    Shuang-Cheng Deng
    Ping Liang
    Jia Liu
    Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2017, 30 : 1416 - 1425
  • [45] Monitoring Microwave Ablation for Liver Tumors with Electrode Displacement Strain Imaging
    Yang, W.
    Alexander, M.
    Rubert, N.
    Ingle, A.
    Lubner, M.
    Ziemlewicz, T.
    Hinshaw, J. L.
    Lee, F. T., Jr.
    Zagzebski, J. A.
    Varghese, T.
    2014 IEEE INTERNATIONAL ULTRASONICS SYMPOSIUM (IUS), 2014, : 1128 - 1131
  • [46] MR elastography is a good response parameter for microwave ablation liver tumors
    Vogl, Thomas J.
    Dosch, Max P.
    Haas, Yannick
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2022, 152
  • [47] Safety of CT-Guided Microwave Ablation of Subcardiac Liver Tumors
    Johnson, William
    Weekley, Adam
    Suz, Pilar
    Parikh, Nainesh
    El-Haddad, Ghassan
    Mhaskar, Rahul
    Kis, Bela
    CARDIOVASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2022, 45 (11) : 1693 - 1700
  • [48] Analgesic Effects of Microwave Ablation of Bone and Soft Tissue Tumors Under Local Anesthesia
    Kastler, Adrian
    Alnassan, Hussein
    Pereira, Philippe L.
    Alemann, Guillaume
    Barbe, Daniel-Ange
    Aubry, Sebastien
    Tiberghien, Florence
    Kastler, Bruno
    PAIN MEDICINE, 2013, 14 (12) : 1873 - 1881
  • [49] Use of microwave ablation in the treatment of patients with multiple primary malignant tumors
    Han, Yue
    Shao, Na
    Xi, Xiaoming
    Hao, Xuezhi
    THORACIC CANCER, 2017, 8 (04) : 365 - 371
  • [50] Outcome after hepatic resection versus combined resection and microwave ablation for multiple bilobar colorectal metastases to the liver
    Tanaka, K
    Shimada, H
    Nagano, Y
    Endo, I
    Sekido, H
    Togo, S
    SURGERY, 2006, 139 (02) : 263 - 273