Treatment and outcome of fracture-related infection of the clavicle

Introduction: The number of operatively treated clavicle fractures has increased over the past decades. Conse-quently, this has led to an increase in secondary procedures required to treat complications such as fracture-related infection (FRI). The primary objective of this study was to assess the clinical and functional outcome of patients treated for FRI of the clavicle. The secondary objectives were to evaluate the healthcare costs propose a standardized protocol for the surgical management of this complication.Methods: All patients with a clavicle fracture who underwent open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) tween 1 January 2015 and 1 March 2022 were retrospectively evaluated. This study included patients with an FRI who were diagnosed and treated according to the recommendations multidisciplinary team at the University Hospitals Leuven, Belgium.Results: We evaluated 626 patients with 630 clavicle fractures who underwent ORIF. In total, 28 patients diagnosed with an FRI. Of these, eight (29%) underwent definitive implant removal, five (18%) underwent debridement, antimicrobial treatment and implant retention, and fourteen patients (50%) had their implant exchanged in either a single-stage procedure, a two-stage procedure or after multiple revisions. One patient (3.6%) underwent resection of the clavicle. Twelve patients (43%) underwent autologous bone grafting cortical iliac crest bone graft (n = 6), free vascularized fibular graft (n = 5), cancellous bone graft (n = reconstruct the bone defect. The median follow-up was 32.3 (P25-P75: 23.9-51.1) months. Two patients (7.1%) experienced a recurrence of infection. The functional outcome was satisfactory, with 26 out of 28 patients having full range of motion. The median healthcare cost was euro 11.506 (P25 -P75: euro 7.953-23.798) per patient.Conclusion: FRI is a serious complication that can occur after the surgical treatment of clavicle fractures. opinion, when treated adequately using a multidisciplinary patient-specific approach, the outcome of patients with an FRI of the clavicle is good. The median healthcare costs of these patients are up to 3.5 times higher compared to non-infected operatively treated clavicle fractures. Although not studied individually, we consider factors such as the size of the bone defect, condition of the soft tissue, and patient demand important when comes to guiding our surgical decision making in cases of osseous defects.