Adopting a gender quota policy in Qatar: a path to gender equity

被引:2
作者
Lari, Noora [1 ]
机构
[1] Qatar Univ, Social & Econ Survey Res Inst SESRI, Doha, Qatar
来源
GENDER IN MANAGEMENT | 2024年 / 39卷 / 01期
关键词
Gender quota; Political participation; Government; Women; DESCRIPTIVE REPRESENTATION; WOMEN; LEGISLATURES; LEADERSHIP; ISLAM;
D O I
10.1108/GM-04-2022-0114
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
PurposeSocietal barriers continue to cause gender disparities in women's share of political authority. As a representative case study for the Arab Gulf region, this paper aims to investigate public opinion on adopting a nationwide quota for women's participation in top government offices in the Qatar context. It gathers insights on the following question: How does public opinion respond to a proposed new political arrangement of implementing gender quota laws in Qatar? Design/methodology/approachData were collected via a national telephone survey of a representative sample of 660 Qatari nationals chosen by simple random sampling. A regression analysis was performed for the primary outcome: support for a gender quota system that guarantees a specific proportion of places for women in the government and executive positions. FindingsUnsurprisingly, the findings reveal gender variations in support for the three distinct types of egalitarian policy examined (i.e. a quota for women in top government positions; a quota for women in executive positions in public ministries; and equal wages), with women being more supportive than men. Research limitations/implicationsAssessing the public attitudes toward adopting legislative gender quotas is of interest to policy-makers and civil organizations alike that seek to advance women's political status and democratic representation. Originality/valueThis study is among the very few to empirically examine public opinion on quotas as state-directed initiatives to promote the involvement of women in political power in Qatar.
引用
收藏
页码:130 / 144
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Reckoning With Race and Gender in Public Administration and Public Policy: A Substantive Social Equity Turn
    Pandey, Sanjay K.
    Newcomer, Kathryn
    DeHart-Davis, Leisha
    Johnson, Jasmine McGinnis
    Riccucci, Norma M.
    PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW, 2022, 82 (03) : 386 - 395
  • [42] Gender Equity Efforts in Sports Medicine
    Johnson, Emma E.
    Ode, Gabriella E.
    Ireland, Mary L.
    Middleton, Kellie
    Hammoud, Sommer
    CLINICS IN SPORTS MEDICINE, 2024, 43 (02) : 221 - 232
  • [43] Perceptions of Gender Equity by Urologic Subspecialty
    Martin, Leigh H.
    Haslam, Roxanne E.
    Agnor, Rebecca
    Collins, Austin
    Bassale, Solange
    Seideman, Casey A.
    UROLOGY, 2023, 174 : 35 - 41
  • [44] Toward Gender Equity in Academic Promotions
    Marcotte, Leah M.
    Arora, Vineet M.
    Ganguli, Ishani
    JAMA INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2021, 181 (09) : 1155 - 1156
  • [45] PROGRESS ON EQUITY AND GENDER PARITY IN MEXICO
    Corral Limas, Lizbeth Gabriela
    Morales Corral, Alma Yolanda
    Lozano Sandoval, Veronica Ofelia
    QUAESTIO IURIS, 2021, 14 (01): : 370 - 408
  • [46] Gender-diverse boards and audit fees: What difference does gender quota legislation make?
    Nekhili, Mehdi
    Gull, Ammar Ali
    Chtioui, Tawhid
    Radhouane, Ikram
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS FINANCE & ACCOUNTING, 2020, 47 (1-2) : 52 - 99
  • [47] Gender equity in Senegal's forest governance history: why policy and representation matter
    Bandiaky-Badji, S.
    INTERNATIONAL FORESTRY REVIEW, 2011, 13 (02) : 177 - 194
  • [48] International gender equity in soil science
    Dawson, Lorna
    Brevik, Eric C.
    Reyes-Sanchez, Laura B.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOIL SCIENCE, 2021, 72 (05) : 1929 - 1939
  • [49] Advancing women, parity, and gender equity
    Garcia, M. Nathalia
    Andrews, Elizabeth A.
    White, Candice C.
    Dixon, Debra A.
    Lopez, Ana N.
    Stewart, Denice
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL EDUCATION, 2022, 86 (09) : 1182 - 1190
  • [50] Understanding and improving gender equity in conservation
    Davis, Suzanne L.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE FOR CONSERVATION, 2019, 58 (04) : 202 - 216