Digital democracy: A systematic literature review

被引:6
作者
Congge, Umar [1 ]
Guillamon, Maria-Dolores [2 ]
Nurmandi, Achmad [3 ]
Salahudin [4 ]
Sihidi, Iradhad Taqwa [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Mahammadiyah Sinjai, Fac Social & Polit Sci, Dept Publ Adm, Sinjai, Indonesia
[2] Univ Murcia, Fac Econ & Business, Dept Accounting & Finance, Reg Campus Int Excellence Campus Mare Nostrum, Murcia, Spain
[3] Univ Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta, Fac Social & Polit Sci, Dept Govt Studies, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
[4] Univ Muhammadiyah Malang, Fac Social & Polit Sci, Dept Govt Studies, Malang, Indonesia
来源
FRONTIERS IN POLITICAL SCIENCE | 2023年 / 5卷
关键词
digital democracy; government; participation; social media; internet; movement; SOCIAL MEDIA; POLITICS; GOVERNMENT; MOVEMENT; IDENTITY;
D O I
10.3389/fpos.2023.972802
中图分类号
D81 [国际关系];
学科分类号
030207 ;
摘要
Digital democracy provides a new space for community involvement in democratic life. This study aims to conduct a systematic literature review to uncover the trend of concepts in the study of digital democracy. This study used descriptive analysis with data sources derived from the Scopus database from the period between 2014 and 2020 (a total of 230 articles) and processed with VOSviewer. The results showed three dominant concepts, namely democracy, the internet, and movement. In addition, it was found that the digital era provides positive and negative impacts on democracy, that public knowledge in a quality digital democracy is important, and that there is strong elite control in virtual democracy. The results of this research can be used as a basis for developing digital democracy studies. Meanwhile, this study was limited by the fact that the articles reviewed were only sourced from Scopus and did not include publications from 2022. Therefore, future studies need to take a comparative analysis approach that uses the Web of Science (WoS) database and increases the time period in which articles are sourced.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]   Digital Disobedience and the Limits of Persuasion: Social Media Activism in Hong Kong's 2014 Umbrella Movement [J].
Agur, Colin ;
Frisch, Nicholas .
SOCIAL MEDIA + SOCIETY, 2019, 5 (01)
[2]  
Attatfa Amel, 2020, Procedia Comput Sci, V176, P60, DOI [10.1016/j.procs.2020.08.007, 10.1016/j.procs.2020.08.007]
[3]  
Bastick Z, 2017, PUB ADMIN INF TECH, V25, P3, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-54142-6_1
[4]   The role of online technologies and digital skills in the political participation of citizens with disabilities [J].
Bastien, Frederick ;
Koop, Royce ;
Small, Tamara A. ;
Giasson, Thierry ;
Jansen, Harold .
JOURNAL OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY & POLITICS, 2020, 17 (03) :218-231
[5]  
Bessant J, 2017, CULT THEORY CRIT, V58, P306, DOI 10.1080/14735784.2016.1203810
[6]   Digital Spring? New media and new politics on the campus [J].
Bessant, Judith .
DISCOURSE-STUDIES IN THE CULTURAL POLITICS OF EDUCATION, 2014, 35 (02) :249-265
[7]   Democratization beyond the post-democratic turn: towards a research agenda on new conceptions of citizen participation [J].
Bluehdorn, Ingolfur ;
Butzlaff, Felix .
DEMOCRATIZATION, 2020, 27 (03) :369-388
[8]   Social movement documentary practices: digital storytelling, social media and organizing [J].
Canella, Gino .
DIGITAL CREATIVITY, 2017, 28 (01) :24-37
[9]   From smart to rebel city? Worlding, provincialising and the Barcelona Model [J].
Charnock, Greig ;
March, Hug ;
Ribera-Fumaz, Ramon .
URBAN STUDIES, 2021, 58 (03) :581-600
[10]   The Deferred 'Democracy Dividend' of Citizen Journalism and Social Media: Perils, Promises and Prospects from the Zimbabwean Experience [J].
Chitanana, Tenford ;
Mutsvairo, Bruce .
WESTMINSTER PAPERS IN COMMUNICATION & CULTURE, 2019, 14 (01) :66-80