Not quite eye to AI: student and teacher perspectives on the use of generative artificial intelligence in the writing process

被引:104
作者
Barrett, Alex [1 ]
Pack, Austin [2 ]
机构
[1] Florida State Univ, Coll Educ, Stone Bldg,114 West Call St, Tallahassee, FL 32306 USA
[2] Brigham Young Univ Hawaii, Fac Educ & Social Work, 55-220 Kulanui St, Laie, HI 96762 USA
关键词
Artificial intelligence; Large language model; GPT; Writing education; Academic integrity; PLAGIARISM;
D O I
10.1186/s41239-023-00427-0
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) can be used to author academic texts at a similar level to what humans are capable of, causing concern about its misuse in education. Addressing the role of GenAI in teaching and learning has become an urgent task. This study reports the results of a survey comparing educators' (n = 68) and university students' (n = 158) perceptions on the appropriate use of GenAI in the writing process. The survey included representations of user prompts and output from ChatGPT, a GenAI chatbot, for each of six tasks of the writing process (brainstorming, outlining, writing, revising, feedback, and evaluating). Survey respondents were asked to differentiate between various uses of GenAI for these tasks, which were divided between student and teacher use. Results indicate minor disagreement between students and teachers on acceptable use of GenAI tools in the writing process, as well as classroom and institutional-level lack of preparedness for GenAI. These results imply the need for explicit guidelines and teacher professional development on the use of GenAI in educational contexts. This study can contribute to evidence-based guidelines on the integration of GenAI in teaching and learning.
引用
收藏
页数:24
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]   Algorithmic Bias in Education [J].
Baker, Ryan S. ;
Hawn, Aaron .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN EDUCATION, 2022, 32 (04) :1052-1092
[2]   Cronbach's alpha [J].
Bland, JM ;
Altman, DG .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1997, 314 (7080) :572-572
[3]  
Bonner Euan, 2023, The Journal of Teaching English with Technology, V23, P23, DOI [DOI 10.56297/BKAM1691/WIEO1749, 10.56297/BKAM1691/WIEO1749]
[4]   Comparison of Human and Machine Scoring of Essays: Differences by Gender, Ethnicity, and Country [J].
Bridgeman, Brent ;
Trapani, Catherine ;
Attali, Yigal .
APPLIED MEASUREMENT IN EDUCATION, 2012, 25 (01) :27-40
[5]   Utilizing OpenAI's GPT-4 for written feedback [J].
Carlson, Makenna ;
Pack, Austin ;
Escalante, Juan .
TESOL JOURNAL, 2024, 15 (02)
[6]  
Chan CKY, 2023, Arxiv, DOI arXiv:2305.00280
[7]  
Chiu TK., 2023, Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, V4, P100118, DOI [DOI 10.1016/J.CAEAI.2022.100118, 10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100118 10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100118, 10.1016/J.CAEAI.2022.100118]
[8]  
CHOMSKY N., 1991, CHOMSKYAN TURN, P26
[9]  
CWPA NCTE & NWP, 2011, National Framework for success in postsecondary writing
[10]  
Dehouche N., 2021, Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics, V21, P17, DOI [DOI 10.3354/ESEP00195, 10.3354/ESEP00195]