Bioelectrical impedance analysis-derived phase angle predicts sarcopenia in patients on maintenance hemodialysis

被引:10
作者
Wang, Ying [1 ,2 ]
Hu, Yezi [3 ]
Zhang, Mengyan [1 ,2 ]
Jin, Hui [3 ]
Wen, Yi [1 ,2 ]
Tang, Rining [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Bin [1 ,2 ]
Liu, Bicheng [1 ,2 ]
Liu, Hong [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Southeast Univ, Zhong da Hosp, Dept Nephrol, Sch Med, 87 Dingjiaqiao Rd, Nanjing, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Southeast Univ, Sch Med, Dept Clin Nutr, Nanjing, Peoples R China
[3] Southeast Univ, Zhong da Hosp, Dept Nutr, Sch Med, Nanjing, Peoples R China
关键词
bioimpedance; hemodialysis; muscle mass; phase angle; sarcopenia; POPULATION REFERENCE VALUES; BODY-COMPOSITION; DIAGNOSIS; MASS; AGE;
D O I
10.1002/ncp.10967
中图分类号
R15 [营养卫生、食品卫生]; TS201 [基础科学];
学科分类号
100403 ;
摘要
BackgroundThis study aimed to investigate the association between phase angle (PhA) and sarcopenia and evaluate its performance as a sarcopenia predictor in patients receveing maintenance hemodialysis (MHD). MethodsAll enrolled patients underwent handgrip strength (HGS) and the 6-m walk test, and muscle mass was measured using bioelectrical impedance analysis. Sarcopenia was diagnosed according to the diagnostic criteria of the Asian Sarcopenia Working Group. Logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the PhA as an independent predictor of sarcopenia after adjusting for confounding factors. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to analyze the predictive value of PhA in sarcopenia. ResultsTwo hundred forty-one patients receiving hemodialysis were enrolled in this study, and the prevalence of sarcopenia was 28.2%. Patients with sarcopenia presented a lower PhA value (4.7 degrees vs 5.5 degrees; P < 0.001), lower muscle mass index (6.0 vs 7.2 [kg/m(2)]; P < 0.001), lower HGS (19.7 vs 26.0 [kg]; P < 0.001), and lower walk speed (0.83 +/- 0.27 vs 0.92 +/- 0.23 [m/s]; P = 0.007) than patients without sarcopenia. The odds of patients receiving MHD presenting with sarcopenia increased as PhA decreased, even after adjustment (odds ratio = 0.39; 95% CI, 0.18-0.85; P = 0.019). ROC analysis revealed that the best cutoff value of PhA for sarcopenia was 4.95 degrees in patients receiving MHD. ConclusionPhA may be a useful and simple predictor for predicting patients undergoing hemodialysis who are at risk of sarcopenia. To further facilitate the application of PhA in the diagnosis of sarcopenia, more research need to be conducted.
引用
收藏
页码:881 / 888
页数:8
相关论文
共 40 条
  • [1] Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis Measures and Clinical Outcomes in CKD
    Bansal, Nisha
    Zelnick, Leila R.
    Himmelfarb, Jonathan
    Chertow, Glenn M.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES, 2018, 72 (05) : 662 - 672
  • [2] Bioelectrical impedance analysis: population reference values for phase angle by age and sex
    Barbosa-Silva, MCG
    Barros, AJ
    Wang, J
    Heymsfield, SB
    Pierson, RN
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION, 2005, 82 (01) : 49 - 52
  • [3] Bioelectrical impedance analysis in clinical practice: a new perspective on its use beyond body composition equations
    Barbosa-Silva, MCG
    Barros, AJD
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN CLINICAL NUTRITION AND METABOLIC CARE, 2005, 8 (03) : 311 - 317
  • [4] The diagnosis of sarcopenia is mainly driven by muscle mass in hemodialysis patients
    Bataille, Stanislas
    Serveaux, Marianne
    Carreno, Elisa
    Pedinielli, Nathalie
    Darmon, Patrice
    Robert, Alain
    [J]. CLINICAL NUTRITION, 2017, 36 (06) : 1654 - 1660
  • [5] Phase angle from bioelectrical impedance analysis:: Population reference values by age, sex, and body mass index
    Bosy-Westphal, Anja
    Danielzik, Sandra
    Doerhoefer, Ralf-Peter
    Later, Wiebke
    Wiese, Sonja
    Mueller, Manfred J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PARENTERAL AND ENTERAL NUTRITION, 2006, 30 (04) : 309 - 316
  • [6] Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia: 2019 Consensus Update on Sarcopenia Diagnosis and Treatment
    Chen, Liang-Kung
    Woo, Jean
    Assantachai, Prasert
    Auyeung, Tung-Wai
    Chou, Ming-Yueh
    Iijima, Katsuya
    Jang, Hak Chul
    Kang, Lin
    Kim, Miji
    Kim, Sunyoung
    Kojima, Taro
    Kuzuya, Masafumi
    Lee, Jenny S. W.
    Lee, Sang Yoon
    Lee, Wei-Ju
    Lee, Yunhwan
    Liang, Chih-Kuang
    Lim, Jae-Young
    Lim, Wee Shiong
    Peng, Li-Ning
    Sugimoto, Ken
    Tanaka, Tomoki
    Won, Chang Won
    Yamada, Minoru
    Zhang, Teimei
    Akishita, Masahiro
    Arai, Hidenori
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL DIRECTORS ASSOCIATION, 2020, 21 (03) : 300 - +
  • [7] Sarcopenia: revised European consensus on definition and diagnosis
    Cruz-Jentoft, Alfonso J.
    Bahat, Gulistan
    Bauer, Juergen
    Boirie, Yves
    Bruyere, Olivier
    Cederholm, Tommy
    Cooper, Cyrus
    Landi, Francesco
    Rolland, Yves
    Sayer, Avan Aihie
    Schneider, Stephane M.
    Sieber, Cornel C.
    Topinkova, Eva
    Vandewoude, Maurits
    Visser, Marjolein
    Zamboni, Mauro
    [J]. AGE AND AGEING, 2019, 48 (01) : 16 - 31
  • [8] Malnutrition and sarcopenia assessment in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease according to international diagnostic criteria, and evaluation of raw BIA variables
    de Blasio, Francesca
    Di Gregorio, Ada
    de Blasio, Francesco
    Bianco, Andrea
    Bellofiore, Barbara
    Scalfi, Luca
    [J]. RESPIRATORY MEDICINE, 2018, 134 : 1 - 5
  • [9] Di Renzo L, 2019, EUR REV MED PHARMACO, V23, P1322, DOI 10.26355/eurrev_201902_17027
  • [10] Predictive value of phase angle in sarcopenia in patients on maintenance hemodialysis
    Ding, Yan
    Chang, Liyang
    Zhang, Hongmei
    Wang, Shaoling
    [J]. NUTRITION, 2022, 94