Risk communication clarity and insurance demand: The case of the COVID-19 pandemic

被引:2
作者
Feng, Jingbing [1 ]
Xu, Xian [2 ]
Zou, Hong [3 ]
机构
[1] East China Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Business, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[2] Fudan Univ, Dept Insurance & Risk Management, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Hong Kong, Fac Business & Econ, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
Risk information; Information ambiguity; Risk salience; Insurance demand; COVID-19; BEHAVIOR EXPERIMENTAL-EVIDENCE; INFORMATION; AMBIGUITY; SALIENCE; UNCERTAINTY; PSYCHOLOGY; ECONOMICS; CHOICE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jedc.2022.104562
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
We study how the clarity of COVID-19 risk communications affects COVID-19 insurance demand using proprietary prefecture-level insurance data from China. We find that when local disclosures of COVID-19 risk contain case origin information, local purchases of COVID-19 insurance and local Internet searches for COVID-19 information increase, even after controlling for newly confirmed local cases and new deaths. Our results are robust to using the disclosure clarity of a major neighboring city. The findings suggest that providing improved knowledge about risk to individuals lead them to engage in more risk management. Our evidence contributes to the debate over how risk communication affects individuals' risk-related behaviors. (C) 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]   The Effect of Product Misperception on Economic Outcomes: Evidence from the Extended Warranty Market [J].
Abito, Jose Miguel ;
Salant, Yuval .
REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 2019, 86 (06) :2285-2318
[2]   Inequality in the impact of the coronavirus shock: Evidence from real time surveys [J].
Adams-Prassl, Abi ;
Boneva, Teodora ;
Golin, Marta ;
Rauh, Christopher .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 2020, 189
[3]   THE EFFECT OF AMBIGUITY AVERSION ON INSURANCE AND SELF-PROTECTION [J].
Alary, David ;
Gollier, Christian ;
Treich, Nicolas .
ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 2013, 123 (573) :1188-1202
[4]   Polarization and public health: Partisan differences in social distancing during the coronavirus pandemic [J].
Allcott, Hunt ;
Boxell, Levi ;
Conway, Jacob ;
Gentzkow, Matthew ;
Thaler, Michael ;
Yang, David .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 2020, 191
[5]  
ARROW KJ, 1963, AM ECON REV, V53, P941
[6]   The Nature of Risk Preferences: Evidence from Insurance Choices [J].
Barseghyan, Levon ;
Molinari, Francesca ;
O'Donoghue, Ted ;
Teitelbaum, Joshua C. .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2013, 103 (06) :2499-2529
[7]   Impact of a randomized controlled trial in arsenic risk communication on household water-source choices in Bangladesh [J].
Bennear, Lori ;
Tarozzi, Alessandro ;
Pfaff, Alexander ;
Balasubramanya, Soumya ;
Ahmed, Kazi Matin ;
van Geen, Alexander .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2013, 65 (02) :225-240
[8]   Salience Theory of Choice Under Risk [J].
Bordalo, Pedro ;
Gennaioli, Nicola ;
Shleifer, Andrei .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2012, 127 (03) :1243-1285
[9]   Restoring Rational Choice: The Challenge of Consumer Financial Regulation [J].
Campbell, John Y. .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2016, 106 (05) :1-30
[10]   Relaxing household liquidity constraints through social security [J].
Catherine, Sylvain ;
Miller, Max ;
Sarin, Natasha .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 2020, 189