Improving the analysis and reporting of studies of nature-based adventure interventions: a review of studies published in JAEOL

被引:11
作者
Rosa, Claudio D. [1 ]
Chaves, Talisson Santos [2 ]
Collado, Silvia [3 ]
Harper, Nevin J. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Estadual Santa Cruz, Dept Dev & Environm, Ilheus, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Sao Carlos, Dept Physiol Sci, Sao Carlos, Brazil
[3] Univ Saragossa, Dept Psychol & Sociol, Teruel, Spain
[4] Univ Victoria, Sch Exercise Sci Phys & Hlth Educ, Victoria, BC, Canada
关键词
Adventure; methodology; nature-based intervention; wilderness; WILDERNESS THERAPY; MENTAL-HEALTH; APA PUBLICATIONS; STRESS-DISORDER; PROGRAM; ADOLESCENTS; REHABILITATION; DEPRESSION; PSYCHOLOGY; STANDARDS;
D O I
10.1080/14729679.2023.2196638
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Nature-based adventure (NBA) interventions can be broadly understood as any intervention of adventure occurring in a natural setting not necessarily involving a licensed mental health professional. Evidence suggests that some NBA interventions improve people's health. Although encouraging, the strength of this evidence is often impaired by the non-random allocation of participants to groups and the lack of comparison groups. These design limitations need additional care during data analysis. Moreover, some studies of NBA interventions omit necessary information for the interpretation of their results, which may lead to inaccurate conclusions and hinder replicability. To exemplify these analytical and reporting issues, we evaluated all quantitative studies assessing the effect of an NBA intervention published in the Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning from 2019 to 2021. We provide suggestions to improve the analysis of studies of NBA interventions and discuss the need to report these necessary elements in future studies.
引用
收藏
页码:642 / 661
页数:20
相关论文
共 98 条
[1]  
American Psychiatric Association, 2014, Manual diagnostico e estatistico de transtornos mentais (DSM-5), V5th ed.
[2]  
American Psychological Association, 2020, Publication manual of the American Psychological Association: the official guide to APA style, V7th, DOI 10.1037/0000165-000
[3]   Retire statistical significance [J].
Amrhein, Valentin ;
Greenland, Sander ;
McShane, Blake .
NATURE, 2019, 567 (7748) :305-307
[4]   On making causal claims: A review and recommendations [J].
Antonakis, John ;
Bendahan, Samuel ;
Jacquart, Philippe ;
Lalive, Rafael .
LEADERSHIP QUARTERLY, 2010, 21 (06) :1086-1120
[5]   Journal Article Reporting Standards for Quantitative Research in Psychology: The APA Publications and Communications Board Task Force Report [J].
Appelbaum, Mark ;
Cooper, Harris ;
Kline, Rex B. ;
Mayo-Wilson, Evan ;
Nezu, Arthur M. ;
Rao, Stephen M. .
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 2018, 73 (01) :3-25
[6]   The association between green space and mental health varies across the lifecourse. A longitudinal study [J].
Astell-Burt, Thomas ;
Mitchell, Richard ;
Hartig, Terry .
JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH, 2014, 68 (06) :578-583
[7]   Differential dropout and bias in randomised controlled trials: when it matters and when it may not [J].
Bell, Melanie L. ;
Kenward, Michael G. ;
Fairclough, Diane L. ;
Horton, Nicholas J. .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2013, 346
[8]  
Benninger E., 2020, Glob. J. Community Psychol. Pract, V11, P1
[9]   Child and Adolescent Depression: A Review of Theories, Evaluation Instruments, Prevention Programs, and Treatments [J].
Bernaras, Elena ;
Jaureguizar, Joana ;
Garaigordobil, Maite .
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2019, 10
[10]  
Berwanger O., 2006, REV BRASILEIRA HIPER, V13, P65