Long-term outcomes of local resection versus surgical resection for high-risk T1 colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:16
作者
Chen, Yuxiang [1 ]
Jing, Weina [1 ]
Chen, Mo [2 ,3 ]
Wang, Zhu [1 ]
Wu, Junchao [1 ]
Yang, Jinlin [1 ]
Yang, Li [1 ]
Deng, Kai [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, Dept Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[2] Sichuan Univ, Tibetan Chengdu Branch Hosp, West China Hosp, Dept Gerontol, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[3] Hosp Chengdu, Dept Gerontol, Off Peoples Govt Tibetan Autonomous Reg, Chengdu, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
ENDOSCOPIC SUBMUCOSAL DISSECTION; RECURRENCE-FREE SURVIVAL; COLON-CANCER; MULTICENTER; MANAGEMENT; CARCINOMA; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1016/j.gie.2023.02.027
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and Aims: Patients with T1 colorectal cancer (CRC) are at high risk for lymph node metastasis and recurrence after local resection (LR) and need surgical resection (SR) for additional lymph node dissection to improve prognosis. However, the net benefits of SR and LR are still unquantified. Methods: We conducted a systematic search for studies in which survival analysis among high-risk T1 CRC pa-tients undergoing LR and SR was performed. Overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and disease specific survival (DSS) data were extracted. Hazard ratios (HRs) and fitted survival curves for OS, RFS, and DSS were used to estimate the long-term clinical outcomes of patients in the 2 groups. Results: This meta-analysis included 12 studies. Compared with those in the SR group, patients in the LR group had higher risks of death (HR, 2.06; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.59-2.65), recurrence (HR, 3.51; 95% CI, 2.51-4.93), and cancer-related mortality (HR, 2.31; 95% CI, 1.17-4.54) in the long term. Fitted survival curves for the LR and SR groups revealed the 5-year, 10-year, and 20-year rates for OS (86.3% and 94.5%, 72.9% and 84.4%, and 61.8% and 71.1%), RFS (89.9% and 96.9%, 83.3% and 93.9%, and 29.6% and 90.8%), and DSS (96.7% and 98.3%, 86.9% and 97.1%, and 86.9% and 96.4%). Log-rank tests showed significant differences among all outcomes except 5-year DSS. Conclusions: For high-risk T1 CRC patients, the net benefit of DSS appears to be significant when the observa-tion period exceeds 10 years. A long-term net benefit may exist but may not be applicable to all patients, especially high-risk patients with comorbidities. Therefore, LR may be a reasonable alternative for individualized treatment for some high-risk T1 CRC patients. (Gastrointest Endosc 2023;97:1016-30.)
引用
收藏
页码:1016 / 1030.e14
页数:29
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [1] Clinical management of endoscopically resected pT1 colorectal cancer
    Antonelli, Giulio
    Berardi, Giammauro
    Vinciguerra, Gian Luca Rampioni
    Brescia, Antonio
    Ruggeri, Maurizio
    Mercantini, Paolo
    Corleto, Vito Domenico
    D'Ambra, Giancarlo
    Pilozzi, Emanuela
    Hassan, Cesare
    Angeletti, Stefano
    Di Giulio, Emilio
    [J]. ENDOSCOPY INTERNATIONAL OPEN, 2018, 6 (12) : E1462 - E1469
  • [2] Strategies for targeted drug delivery in treatment of colon cancer: current trends and future perspectives
    Banerjee, Antara
    Pathak, Surajit
    Subramanium, Vimala Devi
    Dharanivasan, G.
    Murugesan, Ramachandran
    Verma, Rama S.
    [J]. DRUG DISCOVERY TODAY, 2017, 22 (08) : 1224 - 1232
  • [3] Long-term Recurrence-free Survival After Standard Endoscopic Resection Versus Surgical Resection of Submucosal Invasive Colorectal Cancer: A Population-based Study
    Belderbos, Tim D. G.
    van Erning, Felice N.
    de Hingh, Ignace H. J. T.
    van Oijen, Martijn G. H.
    Lemmens, Valery E. P. P.
    Siersema, Peter D.
    [J]. CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2017, 15 (03) : 403 - +
  • [4] Benson AB., 2021, J. Natl. Compr. Canc. Netw., V19, P329, DOI DOI 10.6004/JNCCN.2021.0012
  • [5] Predicting lymph node metastasis in pT1 colorectal cancer: a systematic review of risk factors providing rationale for therapy decisions
    Bosch, Steven L.
    Teerenstra, Steven
    de Wilt, Johannes H. W.
    Cunningham, Chris
    Nagtegaal, Iris D.
    [J]. ENDOSCOPY, 2013, 45 (10) : 827 - 834
  • [6] Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries
    Bray, Freddie
    Ferlay, Jacques
    Soerjomataram, Isabelle
    Siegel, Rebecca L.
    Torre, Lindsey A.
    Jemal, Ahmedin
    [J]. CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS, 2018, 68 (06) : 394 - 424
  • [7] Deeks J J, 2003, Health Technol Assess, V7, piii
  • [8] Rectal cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up (vol 28, pg 22, 2017)
    Glynne-Jones, R.
    Wyrwicz, L.
    Tiret, E.
    Brown, G.
    Rodel, C.
    Cervantes, A.
    Arnold, D.
    [J]. ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2018, 29 : 263 - 263
  • [9] Enhanced secondary analysis of survival data: reconstructing the data from published Kaplan-Meier survival curves
    Guyot, Patricia
    Ades, A. E.
    Ouwens, Mario J. N. M.
    Welton, Nicky J.
    [J]. BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2012, 12
  • [10] Subpopulation analysis of survival in high-risk T1 colorectal cancer: surgery versus endoscopic resection only
    Ha, Ryun Kyong
    Park, Boram
    Han, Kyung Su
    Sohn, Dae Kyung
    Hong, Chang Won
    Kim, Byung Chang
    Kim, Bun
    Park, Sung Chan
    Chang, Hee Jin
    Oh, Jae Hwan
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2022, 96 (06) : 1036 - +