Differential license plate pricing and electric vehicle adoption in Shanghai, China

被引:18
作者
Li, Guodong [1 ]
Walls, W. D. [2 ]
Zheng, Xiaoli [1 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Univ Int Business & Econ, Sch Business, 1900 Wenxiang Rd, Shanghai 201620, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Calgary, Dept Econ, 2500 Univ Dr, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada
关键词
Electric vehicle; License pricing; Vehicle control policy; POLICY INCENTIVES; ACCEPTANCE; MARKET;
D O I
10.1016/j.tra.2023.103672
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Electric vehicles (EVs) are the most direct pathway to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in the transportation sector. Regulators worldwide have announced ambitious targets for EV adoption to replace internal combustion engine vehicles (ICEVs). A program of direct financial subsidy is a dominant policy to encourage adoption. This paper investigates an alternative policy based on differential license plate pricing across vehicle types in Shanghai, China's largest regional EV market. Using monthly vehicle registration data from Shanghai, we find that EV sales would increase by 56%-65% if the differential between ICEV and EV license plate costs rises by 1,000 yuan ($150). We compare differential license plate pricing with the purchase subsidy policy. With a fiscal-neutral policy scheme, differential license plate pricing is more effective for promoting EV adoption than direct purchase subsidies. We also discuss the implications of the ongoing policy change where the free license is no longer granted to plug-in hybrid electric vehicle (PHEV) buyers starting in 2023. We show that the new policy scheme could still be more effective than subsidies in encouraging battery electric vehicle (BEV) adoption. The new policy scheme, combined with relaxed price ceilings in the ICEV license auction market, will yield comparable or even larger adoption growth than the previous policy.
引用
收藏
页数:26
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   AUTOMOBILE PRICES IN MARKET EQUILIBRIUM [J].
BERRY, S ;
LEVINSOHN, J ;
PAKES, A .
ECONOMETRICA, 1995, 63 (04) :841-890
[2]   Should BEVs be subsidized or taxed? A European perspective based on the economic value of CO2 emissions [J].
Cavallaro, Federico ;
Danielis, Romeo ;
Nocera, Silvio ;
Rotaris, Lucia .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART D-TRANSPORT AND ENVIRONMENT, 2018, 64 :70-89
[3]   Plug-in electric vehicle diffusion in California: Role of exposure to new technology at home and work [J].
Chakraborty, Debapriya ;
Bunch, David S. ;
Brownstone, David ;
Xu, Bingzheng ;
Tal, Gil .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART A-POLICY AND PRACTICE, 2022, 156 :133-151
[4]   A stated choice experiment to measure the effect of informational and normative conformity in the preference for electric vehicles [J].
Cherchi, Elisabetta .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART A-POLICY AND PRACTICE, 2017, 100 :88-104
[5]   Effectiveness of battery electric vehicle promotion on particulate matter emissions reduction [J].
Choi, Hyunhong ;
Koo, Yoonmo .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART D-TRANSPORT AND ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 93
[6]   Providing the Spark: Impact of financial incentives on battery electric vehicle adoption [J].
Clinton, Bentley C. ;
Steinberg, Daniel C. .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2019, 98
[7]   The impact of government incentives for hybrid-electric vehicles: Evidence from US states [J].
Diamond, David .
ENERGY POLICY, 2009, 37 (03) :972-983
[8]   Understanding the impact of reoccurring and non-financial incentives on plug-in electric vehicle adoption - A review [J].
Hardman, Scott .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART A-POLICY AND PRACTICE, 2019, 119 :1-14
[9]   Effects of vehicle purchase restrictions on urban air quality: Empirical study on cities in China [J].
He, Xiaoping ;
Jiang, Shuo .
ENERGY POLICY, 2021, 148
[10]   Distributional Effects of Air Pollution from Electric Vehicle Adoption [J].
Holland, Stephen P. ;
Mansur, Erin T. ;
Muller, Nicholas Z. ;
Yates, Andrew J. .
JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL AND RESOURCE ECONOMISTS, 2019, 6 :S65-S94