Energy efficiency evaluation, changing trends and determinants of energy productivity growth across South Asian countries: SBM-DEA and Malmquist approach

被引:40
作者
Shah, Wasi Ul Hassan [1 ]
Hao, Gang [2 ]
Yan, Hong [1 ]
Yasmeen, Rizwana [3 ]
Lu, Yuting [1 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Shuren Univ, Sch Management, Hangzhou 310015, Peoples R China
[2] City Univ Hong Kong, Dept Management Sci, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[3] Panzhihua Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Panzhihua 617000, Sichuan, Peoples R China
关键词
Energy efficiency; Technological advancement; DEA; Malmquist Productivity Index; South Asia; SLACKS-BASED MEASURE; SUSTAINABILITY; CONSUMPTION; REGIONS;
D O I
10.1007/s11356-022-23484-w
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Energy efficiency is widely regarded as the most efficient means of supplying additional energy to meet the rising demand. However, extensive energy consumption causes greenhouse emissions, environmental destruction, and a decrease in energy efficiency (EE). This study investigates the role of energy efficiency and productivity growth in the ecological improvement of South Asia. Moreover, it evaluates the determinants (efficiency change or technology change) of energy productivity change across different SA (South Asian) countries. To estimate the energy efficiency and productivity change, we employed SBM-DEA and Malmquist Productivity Index methods with three inputs (capital stock, labor, and energy consumption), a single desirable output (gross domestic product) and a single undesirable output (CO2 emissions) on the well-extended dataset (2001-2019) for 6 South Asian countries. Furthermore, to check the impact of energy policy (2010) over the study period, the statistical significance of the change in mean scores for energy efficiency and productivity over two time periods (2001-2010 and 2011-2019) and six countries was examined using the Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis tests. Results reveal that the average EE score of all 6 SA countries for the study period is 0.7278. This score shows that SA countries still have the potential of 27.22% to improve their energy efficiency to minimize the inputs to get the optimum output level with the least emissions. The primary determinant of energy productivity growth is technological change instead of efficiency. The average energy efficiency level is significantly different for two time periods, 2001-2010 and 2011-2019. Results conclude that energy efficiency and productivity in SA declined over the period, and potential causes are an inefficiency in the energy conversion process, extensive utilization of inputs, and less output growth.
引用
收藏
页码:19890 / 19906
页数:17
相关论文
共 70 条
  • [1] Estimate of transient and persistent energy efficiency in Africa: A stochastic frontier approach
    Adom, Philip Kofi
    Amakye, Kwaku
    Abrokwa, Kennedy Kwabena
    Quaidoo, Christopher
    [J]. ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2018, 166 : 556 - 568
  • [2] Everyday Technology in South and Southeast Asia: An introduction
    Arnold, David
    DeWald, Erich
    [J]. MODERN ASIAN STUDIES, 2012, 46 : 1 - 17
  • [3] Urbanization and Environmental Degradation: Evidence from Four SAARC Countries-Bangladesh, India, Pakistan, and Sri Lanka
    Azam, Muhammad
    Khan, Abdul Qayyum
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRESS & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY, 2016, 35 (03) : 823 - 832
  • [4] SOME MODELS FOR ESTIMATING TECHNICAL AND SCALE INEFFICIENCIES IN DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS
    BANKER, RD
    CHARNES, A
    COOPER, WW
    [J]. MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1984, 30 (09) : 1078 - 1092
  • [5] Centre SE, 2012, SAARC ACTION PLAN EN
  • [6] MEASURING EFFICIENCY OF DECISION-MAKING UNITS
    CHARNES, A
    COOPER, WW
    RHODES, E
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1978, 2 (06) : 429 - 444
  • [7] How does technological innovation mitigate CO2 emissions in OECD countries? Heterogeneous analysis using panel quantile regression
    Cheng, Cheng
    Ren, Xiaohang
    Dong, Kangyin
    Dong, Xiucheng
    Wang, Zhen
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2021, 280
  • [8] Does energy productivity and public-private investment in energy achieve carbon neutrality target of China?
    Cheng, Gang
    Zhao, Changjuan
    Iqbal, Najaf
    Gulmez, Ozge
    Isik, Hayriye
    Kirikkaleli, Dervis
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2021, 298
  • [9] Fare R., 1992, Journal of Productivity Analysis, V3, P85, DOI [10.1007/BF00158770, DOI 10.1007/BF00158770]
  • [10] Technology development and energy productivity in China
    Fisher-Vanden, Karen
    Jefferson, Gary H.
    Ma Jingkui
    Xu Jianyi
    [J]. ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2006, 28 (5-6) : 690 - 705