On the impacts of agricultural subsidies on agricultural carbon emissions in China: empirical evidence from microdata of rice production

被引:7
作者
Du, Jianjun [1 ]
Liu, Hongru [2 ]
Yuan, Yuesi [3 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Univ Polit Sci & Law, Sch Govt Adm, Shanghai 201701, Peoples R China
[2] Henan Normal Univ, Business Sch, Xinxiang 453007, Peoples R China
[3] Hunan Univ Sci & Engn, Sch Econ & Management, Yongzhou 425100, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家社会科学基金;
关键词
Agricultural subsidies; Agricultural carbon emissions; The Thousand-Village Survey; CO2; EMISSIONS; TECHNOLOGIES; ENERGY; POLICY; DETERMINANTS; CITY;
D O I
10.1007/s11356-023-29096-2
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
China's agricultural subsidy system has increased the investment on the agricultural production factors such as energy and chemistry, which caused an increase of agricultural carbon emissions. Based on the Thousand-Village Survey data from Shanghai University of Finance and Economics in 2013, the focal paper uses ordinary and two-stage least squares (OLS and 2SLS) to systematically investigate the impact and mechanism of agricultural subsidies on agricultural carbon emissions in China. Results show that China's current agricultural subsidy system has a promoting effect on agricultural carbon emissions. Four types of agricultural subsidies, namely, direct grain subsidies, subsidies for improved varieties, comprehensive subsidies for agricultural materials, and agricultural machinery purchase subsidies, impact the agricultural carbon emissions in ascending order. The agricultural subsidies increase the agricultural carbon emissions directly and indirectly. The findings indicate that a new type of agricultural subsidy system should be constructed, which mainly includes subsidies for farmers' out-migrating for work and land transfer, direct subsidies for grain, and subsidies for improved seed varieties. Among them, the direct grain subsidies should be implemented on the size of planting area and subsidies for improved seed varieties on the size of farmland to reduce the agricultural carbon emissions.
引用
收藏
页码:101151 / 101167
页数:17
相关论文
共 59 条
[41]   ECONOMIC INCENTIVES FOR SUSTAINABLE PRODUCTION [J].
REPETTO, R .
ANNALS OF REGIONAL SCIENCE, 1987, 21 (03) :44-59
[42]   Is there a turning point in the relationship between income and energy use and/or carbon emissions? [J].
Richmond, AK ;
Kaufmann, RK .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2006, 56 (02) :176-189
[43]  
Ryan B., 1998, Minnesota agricultural Energy Use and the Incidence of a Carbon Tax
[44]  
Sachs, 1999, DEV COUNTRIES CONTRO, P44
[45]  
Shafik N., 1992, EC GROWTH ENV QUALIT
[46]   Punishing and rewarding: How do policy measures affect crop straw use by farmers? An empirical analysis of Jiangsu Province of China [J].
Sun, Dingqiang ;
Ge, Yang ;
Zhou, Yingheng .
ENERGY POLICY, 2019, 134
[47]  
Suqin J, 2021, GREEN AGR TRANSFORMA, P29
[48]  
Tao AiXiang Tao AiXiang, 2012, Asian Agricultural Research, V4, P5
[49]  
Tasman B. A., 2009, Agriculture and GHG mitigation policy: options in addition to the CPRS
[50]  
Toolkiattiwong Patharanun, 2023, Int J Environ Res Public Health, V20, DOI 10.3390/ijerph20032738