Combining Molecular and Radiomic Features for Risk Assessment in Breast Cancer

被引:0
作者
Nguyen, Alex A. [1 ]
McCarthy, Anne Marie [2 ]
Kontos, Despina [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pennsylvania, Dept Bioengn, Philadelphia, PA USA
[2] Univ Pennsylvania, Dept Biostat Epidemiol & Informat, Philadelphia, PA USA
[3] Univ Pennsylvania, Dept Radiol, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
来源
ANNUAL REVIEW OF BIOMEDICAL DATA SCIENCE | 2023年 / 6卷
关键词
breast cancer; risk assessment; radiomics; single-nucleotide polymorphisms; polygenic risk score; DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY; TOMOSYNTHESIS; DENSITY; WOMEN; PREDICTION; MODELS;
D O I
10.1146/annurev-biodatasci-020722-092748
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Breast cancer risk is highly variable within the population and current research is leading the shift toward personalized medicine. By accurately assessing an individual woman's risk, we can reduce the risk of over/undertreatment by preventing unnecessary procedures or by elevating screening procedures. Breast density measured from conventional mammography has been established as one of the most dominant risk factors for breast cancer; however, it is currently limited by its ability to characterize more complex breast parenchymal patterns that have been shown to provide additional information to strengthen cancer risk models. Molecular factors ranging from high penetrance, or high likelihood that a mutation will show signs and symptoms of the disease, to combinations of gene mutations with low penetrance have shown promise for augmenting risk assessment. Although imaging biomarkers and molecular biomarkers have both individually demonstrated improved performance in risk assessment, few studies have evaluated them together. This review aims to highlight the current state of the art in breast cancer risk assessment using imaging and genetic biomarkers.
引用
收藏
页码:299 / 311
页数:13
相关论文
共 89 条
  • [1] A streamlined model for use in clinical breast cancer risk assessment maintains predictive power and is further improved with inclusion of a polygenic risk score
    Allman, Richard
    Spaeth, Erika
    Lai, John
    Gross, Susan J.
    Hopper, John L.
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (01):
  • [2] A comparison of five methods of measuring mammographic density: a case-control study
    Astley, Susan M.
    Harkness, Elaine F.
    Sergeant, Jamie C.
    Warwick, Jane
    Stavrinos, Paula
    Warren, Ruth
    Wilson, Mary
    Beetles, Ursula
    Gadde, Soujanya
    Lim, Yit
    Jain, Anil
    Bundred, Sara
    Barr, Nicola
    Reece, Valerie
    Brentnall, Adam R.
    Cuzick, Jack
    Howell, Tony
    Evans, D. Gareth
    [J]. BREAST CANCER RESEARCH, 2018, 20
  • [3] Breast Cancer Risk Assessment Models and High-Risk Screening
    Barke, Lora D.
    Freivogel, Mary E.
    [J]. RADIOLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2017, 55 (03) : 457 - +
  • [4] Predicting breast cancer risk using interacting genetic and demographic factors and machine learning
    Behravan, Hamid
    Hartikainen, Jaana M.
    Tengstrom, Maria
    Kosma, Veli-Matti
    Mannermaa, Arto
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2020, 10 (01)
  • [5] Probability of carrying a mutation of breast-ovarian cancer gene BRCA1 based on family history
    Berry, DA
    Parmigiani, G
    Sanchez, J
    Schildkraut, J
    Winer, E
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1997, 89 (03) : 227 - 238
  • [6] Assessing Risk of Breast Cancer: A Review of Risk Prediction Models
    Bhatt, Asha A.
    Woodard, Genevieve A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BREAST IMAGING, 2021, 3 (02) : 144 - 155
  • [7] State-of-the-art review on deep learning in medical imaging
    Biswas, Mainak
    Kuppili, Venkatanareshbabu
    Saba, Luca
    Edla, Damodar Reddy
    Suri, Harman S.
    Cuadrado-Godia, Elisa
    Laird, John R.
    Marinhoe, Rui Tato
    Sanches, Joao M.
    Nicolaides, Andrew
    Suri, Jasjit S.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN BIOSCIENCE-LANDMARK, 2019, 24 : 392 - 426
  • [8] The origins of breast cancer associated with mammographic density: a testable biological hypothesis
    Boyd, Norman
    Berman, Hal
    Zhu, Jie
    Martin, Lisa J.
    Yaffe, Martin J.
    Chavez, Sofia
    Stanisz, Greg
    Hislop, Greg
    Chiarelli, Anna M.
    Minkin, Salomon
    Paterson, Andrew D.
    [J]. BREAST CANCER RESEARCH, 2018, 20
  • [9] Body size, mammographic density, and breast cancer risk
    Boyd, Norman F.
    Martin, Lisa J.
    Sun, Limei
    Guo, Helen
    Chiarelli, Anna
    Hislop, Greg
    Yaffe, Martin
    Minkini, Salomon
    [J]. CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 2006, 15 (11) : 2086 - 2092
  • [10] A case-control evaluation of 143 single nucleotide polymorphisms for breast cancer risk stratification with classical factors and mammographic density
    Brentnall, Adam R.
    van Veen, Elke M.
    Harkness, Elaine F.
    Rafiq, Sajjad
    Byers, Helen
    Astley, Susan M.
    Sampson, Sarah
    Howell, Anthony
    Newman, William G.
    Cuzick, Jack
    Evans, Dafydd Gareth R.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2020, 146 (08) : 2122 - 2129