Environmental and socio-economic effects of construction and demolition waste recycling in the European Union

被引:65
作者
Caro, D. [1 ]
Lodato, C. [2 ]
Damgaard, A. [2 ]
Cristobal, J. [3 ]
Foster, G. [1 ]
Flachenecker, F. [4 ,5 ]
Tonini, D. [1 ]
机构
[1] European Commiss, Joint Res Ctr, Calle Inca Garcilaso, Seville 41092, Spain
[2] Tech Univ Denmark, Dept Environm & Resource Engn, Bygningstorvet 115, DK-2800 Lyngby, Denmark
[3] European Commiss, Joint Res Ctr, Via Fermi, I-21027 Ispra, Italy
[4] European Commiss, Directorate Gen Environm, Brussels, Belgium
[5] UCL, Inst Sustainable Resources, London, England
关键词
Infrastructure waste; Circular economy; Recycling; Environmental assessment; Socio-economic assessment; Secondary materials; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; MANAGEMENT; AGGREGATE; CONCRETE; CEMENT; LCA;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.168295
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The recovery rate of construction and demolition waste (CDW) in the European Union (EU) is at 89 % and thus high relative to other waste streams. However, the relatively high figure can be misleading because it typically does not correspond to high-value material recovery but rather "poor" levels of circularity. From a life-cycle perspective, we assess the environmental impacts and costs of 12 CDW material fractions relying on alterna-tive pathways and treatment technologies. The results indicate important trade-offs in the transition towards the circular economy. Indeed, recycling of concrete, bricks, gypsum, and ceramics and tiles represent the best environmental performance but also the most expensive pathway. However, when shifting from landfill to recycling the total societal costs in the EU are reduced mainly due to the lower external costs. Overall, recycling CDW in the EU with advanced technologies would save about 264 kg CO2-eq t(-1) with a cost of 25 EUR t(-1). The maximum potential for recycling under current technology in the EU would lead to an annual total reduction of about 33 Mt. of CO2-eq using 2020 as reference year. The fractions with the highest potential for improving current waste management practices in terms of environmental improvements are concrete and bricks. The economic and non-economic barriers for realising this potential at EU level are discussed in relation to the European Green Deal and the EU's circular economy objectives.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]  
Albizzati P.F., 2023, Harmonised Labelling of Waste Receptacles Matching Product Labels, DOI [10.2760/09021, DOI 10.2760/09021]
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2016, Off J Eur Union
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2020, Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2008, Official Journal of the European Union, 2008 Council Decision of 14 May 2008 (L131/7)
[5]   Life cycle assessment on construction and demolition waste recycling: a systematic review analyzing three important quality aspects [J].
Bayram, Berfin ;
Greiff, Kathrin .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2023, 28 (08) :967-989
[6]   Concrete based on recycled aggregates - Recycling and environmental analysis: A case study of paris' region [J].
Ben Fraj, Amor ;
Idir, Rachida .
CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS, 2017, 157 :952-964
[7]  
Bisinella V., 2018, Life Cycle Assessment of Grocery Carrier Bags
[8]   Life cycle of buildings, demolition and recycling potential: A case study in Turin, Italy [J].
Blengini, Gian Andrea .
BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2009, 44 (02) :319-330
[9]   Life cycle assessment of non-hazardous Construction and Demolition Waste (CDW) management in Lombardy Region (Italy) [J].
Borghi, Giulia ;
Pantini, Sara ;
Rigamonti, Lucia .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 184 :815-825
[10]   Key issues and options in accounting for carbon sequestration and temporary storage in life cycle assessment and carbon footprinting [J].
Brandao, Miguel ;
Levasseur, Annie ;
Kirschbaum, Miko U. F. ;
Weidema, Bo P. ;
Cowie, Annette L. ;
Jorgensen, Susanne Vedel ;
Hauschild, Michael Z. ;
Pennington, David W. ;
Chomkhamsri, Kirana .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2013, 18 (01) :230-240