Application of machine learning in predicting survival outcomes involving real-world data: a scoping review

被引:17
作者
Huang, Yinan [1 ]
Li, Jieni [2 ]
Li, Mai [3 ]
Aparasu, Rajender R. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Mississippi, Sch Pharm, Dept Pharm Adm, University, MS 38677 USA
[2] Univ Houston, Coll Pharm, Dept Pharmaceut Hlth Outcomes & Policy, Houston, TX 77204 USA
[3] Univ Houston, Dept Ind Engn, Cullen Coll Engn, Houston, TX 77204 USA
关键词
Machine learning; Real-world datasets; Random survival forest; Neural network; MULTIVARIATE DATA-ANALYSIS; MODEL;
D O I
10.1186/s12874-023-02078-1
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundDespite the interest in machine learning (ML) algorithms for analyzing real-world data (RWD) in healthcare, the use of ML in predicting time-to-event data, a common scenario in clinical practice, is less explored. ML models are capable of algorithmically learning from large, complex datasets and can offer advantages in predicting time-to-event data. We reviewed the recent applications of ML for survival analysis using RWD in healthcare.MethodsPUBMED and EMBASE were searched from database inception through March 2023 to identify peer-reviewed English-language studies of ML models for predicting time-to-event outcomes using the RWD. Two reviewers extracted information on the data source, patient population, survival outcome, ML algorithms, and the Area Under the Curve (AUC).ResultsOf 257 citations, 28 publications were included. Random survival forests (N = 16, 57%) and neural networks (N = 11, 39%) were the most popular ML algorithms. There was variability across AUC for these ML models (median 0.789, range 0.6-0.950). ML algorithms were predominately considered for predicting overall survival in oncology (N = 12, 43%). ML survival models were often used to predict disease prognosis or clinical events (N = 27, 96%) in the oncology, while less were used for treatment outcomes (N = 1, 4%).ConclusionsThe ML algorithms, random survival forests and neural networks, are mainly used for RWD to predict survival outcomes such as disease prognosis or clinical events in the oncology. This review shows that more opportunities remain to apply these ML algorithms to inform treatment decision-making in clinical practice. More methodological work is also needed to ensure the utility and applicability of ML models in survival outcomes.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   Approach to machine learning for extraction of real-world data variables from electronic health records [J].
Adamson, Blythe ;
Waskom, Michael ;
Blarre, Auriane ;
Kelly, Jonathan ;
Krismer, Konstantin ;
Nemeth, Sheila ;
Gippetti, James ;
Ritten, John ;
Harrison, Katherine ;
Ho, George ;
Linzmayer, Robin ;
Bansal, Tarun ;
Wilkinson, Samuel ;
Amster, Guy ;
Estola, Evan ;
Benedum, Corey M. ;
Fidyk, Erin ;
Estevez, Melissa ;
Shapiro, Will ;
Cohen, Aaron B. .
FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY, 2023, 14
[42]   Estimation of the epidemiology of dementia and associated neuropsychiatric symptoms by applying machine learning to real-world data [J].
Mar, Javier ;
Gorostiza, Ania ;
Arrospide, Arantzazu ;
Larranaga, Igor ;
Alberdi, Ane ;
Cernuda, Carlos ;
Iruin, Alvaro ;
Tainta, Mikel ;
Mar-Barrutia, Lorea ;
Ibarrondo, Oliver .
REVISTA DE PSIQUIATRIA Y SALUD MENTAL, 2022, 15 (03) :167-175
[43]   Virtual to Real-World Transfer Learning: A Systematic Review [J].
Ranaweera, Mahesh ;
Mahmoud, Qusay H. .
ELECTRONICS, 2021, 10 (12)
[44]   Systematic literature review of machine learning methods used in the analysis of real-world data for patient-provider decision making [J].
Brnabic, Alan ;
Hess, Lisa M. .
BMC MEDICAL INFORMATICS AND DECISION MAKING, 2021, 21 (01)
[45]   Systematic literature review of machine learning methods used in the analysis of real-world data for patient-provider decision making [J].
Alan Brnabic ;
Lisa M. Hess .
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 21
[46]   Meaningful Machine Learning Robustness Evaluation in Real-World Machine Learning Enabled System Contexts [J].
Hiett, Ben ;
Boyd, Peter ;
Fletcher, Charles ;
Gowland, Sam ;
Sharp, James H. ;
Sloggett, David ;
Banks, Alec .
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND MACHINE LEARNING IN DEFENSE APPLICATIONS IV, 2022, 12276
[47]   Application of machine learning in predicting the risk of postpartum depression: A systematic review [J].
Zhong, Minhui ;
Zhang, Han ;
Yu, Chan ;
Jiang, Jinxia ;
Duan, Xia .
JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 2022, 318 :364-379
[48]   The application of machine learning to imaging in hematological oncology: A scoping review [J].
Kotsyfakis, Stylianos ;
Iliaki-Giannakoudaki, Evangelia ;
Anagnostopoulos, Antonios ;
Papadokostaki, Eleni ;
Giannakoudakis, Konstantinos ;
Goumenakis, Michail ;
Kotsyfakis, Michail .
FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2022, 12
[49]   Application of Machine Learning in Multimorbidity Research: Protocol for a Scoping Review [J].
Anthonimuthu, Danny Jeganathan ;
Hejlesen, Ole ;
Zwisler, Ann-Dorthe Olsen ;
Udsen, Flemming Witt .
JMIR RESEARCH PROTOCOLS, 2024, 13
[50]   A scoping review of the clinical application of machine learning in data-driven population segmentation analysis [J].
Liu, Pinyan ;
Wang, Ziwen ;
Liu, Nan ;
Peres, Marco Aurelio .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 2023, 30 (09) :1573-1582