Expectations for sustainability reporting from users, preparers, and the accounting profession

被引:3
|
作者
Elkins, Hamilton [1 ]
Entwistle, Gary [1 ]
Schmidt, Regan N. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Saskatchewan, Edwards Sch Business, 25 Campus Dr, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5A7, Canada
关键词
Sustainability; ESG; Assurance; Materiality; Disclosure; Comment letters; ASSURANCE; CREDIBILITY; STANDARDS; PARTICIPATION; AUDIT; COST;
D O I
10.1057/s41310-023-00206-3
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Sustainability information has become an important component of financial statement users' information needs. Over time, a mosaic of sustainability reporting standard setters and standards have emerged with users, regulators, and government creating pressure for firms to disclose ESG (environmental, social, and governance) information. Given the fragmented disclosure landscape, in 2020 the IFRS Foundation released a consultation paper proposing they create a sustainability standards board and develop a single set of standards. This study examines the expectations users, preparers, and the accounting profession have for sustainability reporting through their comment letters on topics such as the need for a single set of sustainability standards, the standards' initial subject matter, the choice of single or double materiality, and the desire for assurance on sustainability information. Our analysis documents a common desire for a single standard setter and standards. However, there is a lack of consensus and significant differences in opinions pertaining to the initial subject matter of the standards and the approach to materiality. The analysis also suggests an inverse expectations gap whereby the accounting profession is misunderstanding the level of assurance demanded by users and preparers. Subsequent Foundation actions compared to our analysis portend challenges in achieving uniformity in sustainability reporting.
引用
收藏
页码:143 / 164
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Ownership structure, corporate governance, and assurance in sustainability reporting: evidence from Japan
    Haider, Mohammad Badrul
    Nishitani, Kimitaka
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DISCLOSURE AND GOVERNANCE, 2022, 19 (04) : 374 - 388
  • [22] Accounting for Impacts: Exploring Sustainability Reporting in Bulgarian Companies under the CSRD
    Petrova, Petya
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BUSINESS EXCELLENCE, 2024, 18 (01): : 2172 - 2182
  • [23] Evolution of Sustainability Reporting Research: Evidence from Indonesia (A Systematic Literature Review)
    Meutia, Inten
    Tyasari, Irma
    Kartasari, Shelly F.
    Yaacob, Zulnaidi
    INDONESIAN JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABILITY ACCOUNTING AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 6 (01) : 50 - 70
  • [26] New boundaries for sustainability accounting? A case study of multi-entity accounting and reporting in the agrifood sector
    Maughan, Rebecca
    O'Dochartaigh, Aideen
    ACCOUNTING AUDITING & ACCOUNTABILITY JOURNAL, 2023, 36 (09): : 418 - 445
  • [27] Organizational Slack, Corporate Social Responsibility, Sustainability, and Integrated Reporting: Evidence from Korea
    Kim, Su-In
    Shin, Hyejeong
    Shin, Heejeong
    Park, Sorah
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (16)
  • [28] Sustainability accounting and reporting in the mining industry: current literature and directions for future research
    Lodhia, Sumit
    Hess, Nadia
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2014, 84 : 43 - 50
  • [29] Accounting for Sustainability in Asia: Stock Market Regulation and Reporting in Hong Kong and Singapore
    Liu, Felicia H. M.
    Demeritt, David
    Tang, Samuel
    ECONOMIC GEOGRAPHY, 2019, 95 (04) : 362 - 384
  • [30] Influence of Board Governance Characteristics on Sustainability Accounting and Reporting in a Developing Country: Evidence From Nigeria Large Businesses
    Ikpor, Isaac Monday
    Akanu, Otu Otu
    Ugwu, Joy
    Udu, Gabriel Obasi Chidozie
    Ulo, Fabian Udum
    Achilike, Nicholas
    Adama, Linus
    Oganezi, Bethel
    SAGE OPEN, 2024, 14 (01):