Dosimetric evaluation of VMAT treatment plans for patients with stage IIB or III non-small cell lung carcinomas

被引:0
作者
Shaaer, Amani [1 ,2 ]
Osei, Ernest [1 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Darko, Johnson [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Gopaul, Darin [6 ]
机构
[1] Grand River Reg Canc Ctr, Dept Med Phys, Kitchener, ON, Canada
[2] King Faisal Specialist Hosp & Res Ctr, Dept Biomed Phys, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
[3] Univ Waterloo, Dept Phys & Astron, Waterloo, ON, Canada
[4] Univ Guelph, Ontario Vet Coll, Dept Clin Studies, Guelph, ON, Canada
[5] Univ Waterloo, Dept Syst Design Engn, Waterloo, ON, Canada
[6] Grand River Reg Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Kitchener, ON, Canada
关键词
inhomogeneity; lung cancer; NSCLC; treatment planning; VMAT; BODY RADIATION-THERAPY; CONFORMAL RADIOTHERAPY; RISK-FACTORS; ARC THERAPY; CANCER; IRRADIATION; ALGORITHMS; CONCURRENT; SCHEDULES; PHASE-2;
D O I
10.1017/S1460396923000201
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Introduction:Volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) has emerged as a promising radiation treatment technique. One of the challenges in VMAT planning for lung carcinoma is the lack of consistency among different institutions with respect to what is considered an acceptable treatment plan in terms of target coverage and doses to the organs at risk (OAR). Additionally, the accuracy of dose calculations in the presence of heterogeneous medium (i.e. air) is another challenge in lung VMAT planning. Our objective is to develop an institutional criteria for non-stereotactic body radiotherapy (non-SBRT) lung treatment plans by evaluating the dosimetric impact of plan normalisation and dose calculation algorithms, including the Anisotropic Analytical Algorithm (AAA), AcurosXB (AXB) and Monte Carlo (MC) simulation, on VMAT plans for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods:The CT dataset of 20 patients with NSCLC was randomly selected to ensure a spectrum of target sizes and locations. All treatment planning was accomplished with 2-3 VMAT arcs and a prescription of 60 Gy in 30 fractions. Two plan normalisation methods were employed: (i) planning target volume (PTV) V-100% = 95% and (ii) PTV V-95% = 95%. Results:All three dose calculation algorithms revealed heterogeneous and conformal plans irrespective of plan normalisations. The PTV and OARs dose-volume constraints were met using both normalisation methods. However, we observed that AAA overestimated the minimum PTV doses by 2-5% regardless of plan normalisation. The mean PTV-V-100% was lower for AAA in comparison with AXB and MC algorithms. Conclusions:VMAT is an effective radiotherapy technique for achieving greater target dose conformity, heterogeneity and dose fall-off from the PTV for the treatment of NSCLC. The results of this study can provide the basis for the development of local plan acceptability criteria for NSCLC VMAT plans, and the clinical implementation can be achieved with minimal or no imposition on resources and time constraints. Occasionally, plan normalisation of PTV-V-95% = 95% may be required to ensure that the OAR dose tolerances are not exceeded.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 57 条
  • [41] Dosimetric Impact of Acuros XB Dose-to-Water and Dose-to-Medium Reporting Modes on Lung Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy and Its Dependency on Structure Composition
    Munoz-Montplet, Carles
    Fuentes-Raspall, Rafael
    Jurado-Bruggeman, Diego
    Agramunt-Chaler, Sebastia
    Onses-Segarra, Albert
    Buxo, Maria
    [J]. ADVANCES IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2021, 6 (04)
  • [42] Combined radio- and chemotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer: systematic review of landmark studies based on acquired citations
    Nieder, Carsten
    Pawinski, Adam
    Andratschke, Nicolaus H.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2013, 3
  • [43] Performance of dose calculation algorithms from three generations in lung SBRT: comparison with full Monte Carlo-based dose distributions
    Ojala, Jarkko J.
    Kapanen, Mika K.
    Hyodynmaa, Simo J.
    Wigren, Tuija K.
    Pitkanen, Maunu A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2014, 15 (02): : 4 - 18
  • [44] Dosimetric comparison of peripheral NSCLC SBRT using Acuros XB and AAA calculation algorithms
    Ong, Chloe C. H.
    Ang, Khong Wei
    Soh, Roger C. X.
    Tin, Kah Ming
    Yap, Jerome H. H.
    Lee, James C. L.
    Bragg, Christopher M.
    [J]. MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2017, 42 (03) : 216 - 222
  • [45] Dosimetric evaluation of SBRT treatment plans of non-central lung tumours: clinical experience
    Osei, Ernest
    Darko, Johnson
    Swanson, Steph
    Fleming, Katrina
    Snelgrove, Ronald
    Bhangu, Anmol
    Gopaul, Darin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RADIOTHERAPY IN PRACTICE, 2022, 21 (02) : 179 - 199
  • [46] PEREZ CA, 1980, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V45, P2744, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19800601)45:11<2744::AID-CNCR2820451108>3.0.CO
  • [47] 2-U
  • [48] Five-year Long-term Outcomes of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Operable Versus Medically Inoperable Stage I Non-small-cell Lung Cancer: Analysis by Operability, Fractionation Regimen, Tumor Size, and Tumor Location
    Schonewolf, Caitlin A.
    Heskel, Marina
    Doucette, Abigail
    Singhal, Sunil
    Frick, Melissa A.
    Xanthopoulos, Eric P.
    Corradetti, Michael N.
    Friedberg, Joseph S.
    Pechet, Taine T.
    Christodouleas, John P.
    Levin, William
    Berman, Abigail
    Cengel, Keith A.
    Verma, Vivek
    Hahn, Stephen M.
    Kucharczuk, John C.
    Rengan, Ramesh
    Simone, Charles B., II
    [J]. CLINICAL LUNG CANCER, 2019, 20 (01) : E63 - E71
  • [49] 7-Year Follow-Up After Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy for Patients With Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Results of a Phase 2 Clinical Trial
    Sun, Bing
    Brooks, Eric D.
    Komaki, Ritsuko U.
    Liao, Zhongxing
    Jeter, Melenda D.
    McAleer, Mary F.
    Allen, Pamela K.
    Balter, Peter A.
    Welsh, James D.
    O'Reilly, Michael S.
    Gomez, Daniel
    Hahn, Stephen M.
    Roth, Jack A.
    Mehran, Reza J.
    Heymach, John V.
    Chang, Joe Y.
    [J]. CANCER, 2017, 123 (16) : 3031 - 3039
  • [50] Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Inoperable Early Stage Lung Cancer
    Timmerman, Robert
    Paulus, Rebecca
    Galvin, James
    Michalski, Jeffrey
    Straube, William
    Bradley, Jeffrey
    Fakiris, Achilles
    Bezjak, Andrea
    Videtic, Gregory
    Johnstone, David
    Fowler, Jack
    Gore, Elizabeth
    Choy, Hak
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2010, 303 (11): : 1070 - 1076