Investigation and Management of Recurrent Pregnancy Loss: A Comprehensive Review of Guidelines

被引:19
作者
Giouleka, Sonia [1 ]
Tsakiridis, Ioannis [2 ,4 ]
Arsenaki, Elisavet [3 ]
Kalogiannidis, Ioannis [1 ]
Mamopoulos, Apostolos [1 ]
Papanikolaou, Evangelos [1 ]
Athanasiadis, Apostolos [1 ]
Dagklis, Themistoklis [1 ]
机构
[1] Aristotle Univ Thessaloniki, Fac Hlth Sci, Sch Med, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol 3, Thessaloniki, Greece
[2] Aristotle Univ Thessaloniki, Sch Med, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol 3, Maternal Fetal Med,Fac Hlth Sci, Thessaloniki, Greece
[3] Guys & St Thomas NHS Fdn Trust, London, England
[4] Konstantinoupoleos 49, Thessaloniki 54642, Greece
关键词
MOLECULAR-WEIGHT HEPARIN; SPERM DNA FRAGMENTATION; LOW-DOSE ASPIRIN; ANTIPHOSPHOLIPID SYNDROME; MATERNAL AGE; RISK-FACTORS; FETAL LOSS; SUBCLINICAL HYPOTHYROIDISM; CHRONIC ENDOMETRITIS; SPONTANEOUS-ABORTION;
D O I
10.1097/OGX.0000000000001133
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
ImportanceRecurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) is one of the most frustrating clinical entities in reproductive medicine requiring not only diagnostic investigation and therapeutic intervention, but also evaluation of the risk for recurrence.ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to review and compare the most recently published major guidelines on investigation and management of RPL.Evidence AcquisitionA descriptive review of guidelines from the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology, the American Society for Reproductive Medicine, the French College of Gynecologists and Obstetricians, and the German, Austrian, and Swiss Society of Gynecology and Obstetrics on RPL was carried out.ResultsThere is consensus among the reviewed guidelines that the mainstays of RPL investigation are a detailed personal history and screening for antiphospholipid syndrome and anatomical abnormalities of the uterus. In contrast, inherited thrombophilias, vaginal infections, and immunological and male factors of infertility are not recommended as part of a routine RPL investigation. Several differences exist regarding the necessity of the cytogenetic analysis of the products of conception, parental peripheral blood karyotyping, ovarian reserve testing, screening for thyroid disorders, diabetes or hyperhomocysteinemia, measurement of prolactin levels, and performing endometrial biopsy. Regarding the management of RPL, low-dose aspirin plus heparin is indicated for the treatment of antiphospholipid syndrome and levothyroxine for overt hypothyroidism. Genetic counseling is required in case of abnormal parental karyotype. The Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology, and the French College of Gynecologists and Obstetricians guidelines provide recommendations that are similar on the management of cervical insufficiency based on the previous reproductive history. However, there is no common pathway regarding the management of subclinical hypothyroidism and the surgical repair of congenital and acquired uterine anomalies. Use of heparin for inherited thrombophilias and immunotherapy and anticoagulants for unexplained RPL are not recommended, although progesterone supplementation is suggested by the American Society for Reproductive Medicine and the German, Austrian, and Swiss Society of Gynecology and Obstetrics.ConclusionsRecurrent pregnancy loss is a devastating condition for couples. Thus, it seems of paramount importance to develop consistent international practice protocols for cost-effective investigation and management of this early pregnancy complication, with the aim to improve live birth rates.Target AudienceObstetricians and gynecologists, family physicians.Learning ObjectivesAfter participating in this activity, the learner should be better able to define recurrent pregnancy loss; explain the investigation plan for women with recurrent pregnancy loss; and evaluate the management options and propose strategies for the prevention of pregnancy loss in future pregnancies.
引用
收藏
页码:287 / 301
页数:15
相关论文
共 101 条
[21]   Paternal age and maternal age are risk factors for miscarriage; results of a multicentre European study [J].
de La Rochebrochard, E ;
Thonneau, P .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2002, 17 (06) :1649-1656
[22]   CYTOGENETIC STUDIES IN COUPLES EXPERIENCING REPEATED PREGNANCY LOSSES [J].
DEBRAEKELEER, M ;
DAO, TN .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 1990, 5 (05) :519-528
[23]   Cervical cerclage for prevention of preterm delivery: Meta-analysis of randomized trials [J].
Drakeley, AJ ;
Roberts, D ;
Alfirevic, Z .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2003, 102 (03) :621-627
[24]   The Effects of Intravenous Immunoglobulins in Women with Recurrent Miscarriages: A Systematic Review of Randomised Trials with Meta-Analyses and Trial Sequential Analyses Including Individual Patient Data [J].
Egerup, Pia ;
Lindschou, Jane ;
Gluud, Christian ;
Christiansen, Ole Bjarne .
PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (10)
[25]  
El Hachem H, 2017, INT J WOMENS HEALTH, V9, P331, DOI 10.2147/IJWH.S100817
[26]   Prevention of recurrent miscarriage for women with antiphospholipid antibody or lupus anticoagulant - art. no. CD002859.pub2 [J].
Empson, M ;
Lassere, M ;
Craig, J ;
Scott, J .
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2005, (02)
[27]   Thyroid autoantibodies are not associated with recurrent pregnancy loss [J].
Esplin, MS ;
Branch, DW ;
Silver, R ;
Stagnaro-Green, A .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1998, 179 (06) :1583-1586
[28]  
European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology, 2017, RECURRENT PREGNANCY
[29]   Relationship between HLA-G polymorphism and susceptibility to recurrent miscarriage: A meta-analysis of non-family-based studies [J].
Fan, Wei ;
Li, Shangwei ;
Huang, Zhongying ;
Chen, Qiong .
JOURNAL OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTION AND GENETICS, 2014, 31 (02) :173-184
[30]   Reproductive outcome after PGD in couples with recurrent miscarriage carrying a structural chromosome abnormality: a systematic review [J].
Franssen, M. T. M. ;
Musters, A. M. ;
van der Veen, F. ;
Repping, S. ;
Leschot, N. J. ;
Bossuyt, P. M. M. ;
Goddijn, M. ;
Korevaar, J. C. .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION UPDATE, 2011, 17 (04) :467-475