Patient and Clinician Recommendations to Improve Communication and Understanding of Lung Cancer Screening Results

被引:7
作者
Crothers, Kristina [1 ,2 ]
Shahrir, Shahida [2 ,4 ]
Kross, Erin K. [2 ,5 ]
Kava, Christine M. [4 ]
Cole, Allison [3 ]
Wenger, David [7 ]
Triplette, Matthew [2 ,6 ]
机构
[1] VA Puget Sound Healthcare Syst, Div Pulm, Crit Care & Sleep Med, Seattle, WA 98108 USA
[2] Dept Med, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[3] Univ Washington, Dept Family Med, Seattle, WA USA
[4] Univ Washington, Dept Hlth Syst & Populat Hlth, Sch Publ Hlth, Seattle, WA USA
[5] UW Med, Cambia Palliat Care Ctr Excellence, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[6] Fred Hutchinson Canc Ctr, Clin Res Div, Seattle, WA USA
[7] Evergreen Healthcare, Div Pulm & Crit Care, Kirkland, WA USA
关键词
communication; low-dose CT scan; lung cancer screening; shared decision-making; ADHERENCE; QUESTIONS; VETERANS;
D O I
10.1016/j.chest.2022.09.038
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Patient understanding of chest low-dose CT (LDCT) scan results for lung cancer screening (LCS) may impact outcomes.RESEARCH QUESTION: What are patient-and clinician-identified gaps in understanding and communication of LCS results and how might communication be improved through a patient-oriented tool?STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: We performed a mixed-methods study of participants recruited from a multisite LCS program to understand knowledge gaps after receiving LCS results and to guide development of a commonly asked questions (CAQ) after LCS information sheet. Initial patient surveys assessed understanding and reactions to LCS results (n = 190). We then conducted patient interviews and focus group discussions (n = 31) to understand experiences receiving LDCT scan results and reactions to results letters and the proposed CAQ; we also interviewed clinicians (n = 6) for feedback on these resources. We summarized survey re-sponses and used thematic analysis to identify major themes in focus groups and interviews.RESULTS: Of 190 survey respondents (43% response rate), although 88% agreed that they "understood" their LCS results, only 55% reported understanding what a lung nodule is. Approximately two-thirds thought it was "very important" to receive more information regarding lung nodules and incidental lung and heart disease. In interviews and focus groups, although patients believed that brief results letters for normal LDCT scan results generally were acceptable, most found letters explaining abnormal LDCT scan and incidental findings to be concerning and not a substitute for discussion with their clinician. Nearly all patients expressed that the CAQ sheet provided helpful information on nodules, results reporting and incidental findings, and helped them form questions to ask their clinicians.INTERPRETATION: We identified patient-reported information needs regarding LCS results and developed a CAQ information sheet that was refined with patient and clinician input. The CAQ may represent a simple and feasible way to improve LCS results reporting and to augment clinician-patient discussions. CHEST 2023; 163(3):707-718
引用
收藏
页码:707 / 718
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Patient-Reported Barriers and Preferred Interventions to Improve Lung Cancer Screening Uptake
    Jung, Jinho
    Razzak, Eisa
    Avenido, Axs Roc
    Rashidi, Ali
    Jia, Stephanie
    Tran, Natalie Q.
    Yao, Rachel
    Nguyen, Emily L.
    Bernaba, Arsanyous
    Echeverria, Richard
    Nguyen, Tan Q.
    Imanzadeh, Amir
    Sadigh, Gelareh
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY, 2025, 22 (03) : 269 - 279
  • [22] Results of Lung Cancer Screening in the Community
    Handy, John R., Jr.
    Skokan, Michael
    Rauch, Erika
    Zinck, Steven
    Sanborn, Rachel E.
    Kotova, Svetlana
    Wang, Mansen
    ANNALS OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 2020, 18 (03) : 243 - 249
  • [23] Linking Patient Perceptions of Shared Decision Making to Satisfaction in Lung Cancer Screening Decisions
    Robinson, Stephanie A.
    Barker, Anna M.
    Fix, Gemmae M.
    Clayman, Marla L.
    Herbst, Abigail N.
    White, Julie C.
    Wiener, Renda Soylemez
    MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2025,
  • [24] Patient Communication Preferences for Prostate Cancer Screening Discussions: A Scoping Review
    Fong, Justin
    Venables, Maddie
    D'Souza, Deion
    Maskerine, Courtney
    ANNALS OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 2023, 21 (05) : 448 - 455
  • [25] Lung Cancer Screening Patient Selection and Implementation
    Thomas, Nina A.
    Tanner, Nichole T.
    CLINICS IN CHEST MEDICINE, 2020, 41 (01) : 87 - +
  • [26] Lung cancer screening: improving understanding of the psychological impact
    Quaife, Samantha L.
    Janes, Sam M.
    THORAX, 2016, 71 (11) : 971 - 972
  • [27] Harnessing Opportunity: Pilot Intervention to Improve Lung Cancer Screening for Women Undergoing Breast Screening Mammography
    Wong, Lye-Yeng
    Yue, Tiffany
    Aghagoli, Ghazal
    Baiu, Ioana
    Shula, Laura
    Lee, Angela
    Lui, Natalie S.
    Backhus, Leah M.
    JTO CLINICAL AND RESEARCH REPORTS, 2024, 5 (06):
  • [28] Understanding Referral Patterns in a Lung Cancer Screening Program
    Haddad, D.
    Paulson, A.
    Kapoor, S.
    Conway, D.
    Massion, P.
    Sandler, K.
    Deppen, S.
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY, 2019, 14 (10) : S528 - S529
  • [29] Use of Diagnostic CT and Patient Retention in a Lung Cancer Screening Program
    Byrne, Suzanne C.
    Hammer, Mark M.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY, 2022, 19 (01) : 47 - 52
  • [30] Innovation or Inconsistency? Framing Colorectal Cancer Guidelines to Improve Public Perceptions of Updated Screening Recommendations
    Neil, Jordan M.
    Krieger, Janice L.
    Kalyanaraman, Sriram
    George, Thomas J., Jr.
    JOURNAL OF LANGUAGE AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2017, 36 (01) : 14 - 27