Social network analysis and public policy: what's new?

被引:17
作者
Zhang, Wei [1 ]
Zhang, Mingyang [2 ]
Yuan, Ling [1 ]
Fan, Fengchun [1 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, Sch Publ Adm, 24 Nanyiduan,Yihuan Rd, Chengdu 610065, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[2] Cent China Normal Univ, Sch Publ Adm, Wuhan, Peoples R China
基金
中国博士后科学基金; 中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Public policy; social network analysis; study topics; literature review; future research; ADVOCACY COALITION FRAMEWORK; SCHOLARSHIP; GOVERNANCE; BROKERS; ENTREPRENEURSHIP; COLLABORATION; COORDINATION; RECIPROCITY; DRIVERS;
D O I
10.1080/17516234.2021.1996869
中图分类号
K9 [地理];
学科分类号
0705 ;
摘要
As a mature paradigm of network analysis, social network analysis (SNA) is suitable for exploring complicated and interactive relationships in policy research and is of great significance to the innovation and development of public policy research. In this paper, 45 typical articles published in high-ranking journals in the field of public administration were analysed using co-word analysis and qualitative analysis. The application of SNA in public policy studies, including research methods, analytic tools, and basic concepts of network analysis, were systematically reviewed. UCINET software was used to visualize the knowledge network of research topics. The main research topics were classified into five categories: agenda setting, policy network, advocacy coalition, policy learning and diffusion, policy implementation. Finally, this article suggests that network analysis in public administration should be thoroughly re-examined; in particular, scholars should consider the benefits of SNA for public policy research. In the application of SNA to public policy research, it is necessary to broaden the study perspective and scope, further strengthen interdisciplinary theoretical interaction and theoretical innovation, and take advantage of big data and other new technological tools that can develop giant network analysis for public policy.
引用
收藏
页码:115 / 145
页数:31
相关论文
共 76 条
[51]   Linking regional planning and local action: Towards using social network analysis in systematic conservation planning [J].
Mills, Morena ;
Alvarez-Romero, Jorge G. ;
Vance-Borland, Ken ;
Cohen, Philippa ;
Pressey, Robert L. ;
Guerrero, Angela M. ;
Ernstson, Henrik .
BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2014, 169 :6-13
[52]   Business Improvement Districts in Urban Governance: A Longitudinal Case Study [J].
Morcoel, Goektug ;
Vasavada, Triparna ;
Kim, Sohee .
ADMINISTRATION & SOCIETY, 2014, 46 (07) :796-824
[53]   From Participatory Reform to Social Capital: Micro-Motives and the Macro-Structure of Civil Society Networks [J].
Musso, Juliet Ann ;
Weare, Christopher .
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW, 2015, 75 (01) :150-164
[54]   Treating networks seriously: Practical and research-based agendas in public administration [J].
OToole, LJ .
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW, 1997, 57 (01) :45-52
[55]   The Politics of Connections: Assessing the Determinants of Social Structure in Policy Networks [J].
Park, Hyun Hee ;
Rethemeyer, R. Karl .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION RESEARCH AND THEORY, 2014, 24 (02) :349-379
[56]   Understanding governance: Policy networks, governance, reflexivity and accountability [J].
Peters, BG .
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, 1998, 76 (02) :408-409
[57]   Entrepreneurship in the Swedish municipal polis: the case of Mer [*] ostersund [J].
Petridou, Evangelia .
POLICY STUDIES, 2018, 39 (01) :70-89
[58]   Core Concepts and Key Ideas for Understanding Public Sector Organizational Networks: Using Research to Inform Scholarship and Practice [J].
Provan, Keith G. ;
Lemaire, Robin H. .
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW, 2012, 72 (05) :638-648
[59]  
Rhodes R.A.W., 1986, POWER DEPENDENCE POL
[60]   The new governance: Governing without government [J].
Rhodes, RAW .
POLITICAL STUDIES, 1996, 44 (04) :652-667