Replication and trustworthiness

被引:12
作者
Peels, Rik [1 ,2 ]
Bouter, Lex [3 ]
机构
[1] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Philosophy Dept, de Boelelaan 1105, NL-1081 Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Fac Relig & Theol, de Boelelaan 1105, NL-1081 Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Univ Amsterdam, Dept Epidemiol & Data Sci, Med Ctr, Amsterdam, Netherlands
来源
ACCOUNTABILITY IN RESEARCH-ETHICS INTEGRITY AND POLICY | 2023年 / 30卷 / 02期
关键词
Replication; trustworthiness; trust; replicability; reproducibility;
D O I
10.1080/08989621.2021.1963708
中图分类号
R-052 [医学伦理学];
学科分类号
0101 ; 120402 ;
摘要
This paper explores various relations that exist between replication and trustworthiness. After defining "trust", "trustworthiness", "replicability", "replication study", and "successful replication", we consider, respectively, how trustworthiness relates to each of the three main kinds of replication: reproductions, direct replications, and conceptual replications. Subsequently, we explore how trustworthiness relates to the intentionality of a replication. After that, we discuss whether the trustworthiness of research findings depends merely on evidential considerations or also on what is at stake. We conclude by adding replication to the other issues that should be considered in assessing the trustworthiness of research findings: (1) the likelihood of the findings before the primary study was done (that is, the prior probability of the findings), (2) the study size and the methodological quality of the primary study, (3) the number of replications that were performed and the quality and consistency of their aggregated findings, and (4) what is at stake.
引用
收藏
页码:77 / 87
页数:11
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science [J].
Aarts, Alexander A. ;
Anderson, Joanna E. ;
Anderson, Christopher J. ;
Attridge, Peter R. ;
Attwood, Angela ;
Axt, Jordan ;
Babel, Molly ;
Bahnik, Stepan ;
Baranski, Erica ;
Barnett-Cowan, Michael ;
Bartmess, Elizabeth ;
Beer, Jennifer ;
Bell, Raoul ;
Bentley, Heather ;
Beyan, Leah ;
Binion, Grace ;
Borsboom, Denny ;
Bosch, Annick ;
Bosco, Frank A. ;
Bowman, Sara D. ;
Brandt, Mark J. ;
Braswell, Erin ;
Brohmer, Hilmar ;
Brown, Benjamin T. ;
Brown, Kristina ;
Bruening, Jovita ;
Calhoun-Sauls, Ann ;
Callahan, Shannon P. ;
Chagnon, Elizabeth ;
Chandler, Jesse ;
Chartier, Christopher R. ;
Cheung, Felix ;
Christopherson, Cody D. ;
Cillessen, Linda ;
Clay, Russ ;
Cleary, Hayley ;
Cloud, Mark D. ;
Cohn, Michael ;
Cohoon, Johanna ;
Columbus, Simon ;
Cordes, Andreas ;
Costantini, Giulio ;
Alvarez, Leslie D. Cramblet ;
Cremata, Ed ;
Crusius, Jan ;
DeCoster, Jamie ;
DeGaetano, Michelle A. ;
Della Penna, Nicolas ;
den Bezemer, Bobby ;
Deserno, Marie K. .
SCIENCE, 2015, 349 (6251)
[2]   Transparency and replicability in qualitative research: The case of interviews with elite informants [J].
Aguinis, Herman ;
Solarino, Angelo M. .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2019, 40 (08) :1291-1315
[3]  
Collins J., 2018, MARSHMALLOW TEST HEL
[4]   When should potentially false research findings be considered acceptable? [J].
Djulbegovic, Benjamin ;
Hozo, Iztok .
PLOS MEDICINE, 2007, 4 (02) :211-217
[5]  
Faulkner Paul., 2017, PHILOS TRUST
[6]   Replication crisis = trust crisis? The effect of successful vs failed replications on laypeople's trust in researchers and research [J].
Hendriks, Friederike ;
Kienhues, Dorothe ;
Bromme, Rainer .
PUBLIC UNDERSTANDING OF SCIENCE, 2020, 29 (03) :270-288
[7]  
KNAW: Royal Dutch Academy of Arts and Sciences, 2018, REPL STUD IMPR REPR
[8]  
Lakens D., 2020, 20 STAT BLOG STAT ME
[9]   What Is a Replication? [J].
Machery, Edouard .
PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE, 2020, 87 (04) :545-567
[10]  
McLeod Carolyn., 2015, STANFORD ENCY PHILOS