Comparative assessment and multi-objective optimization for the gray and blue ammonia synthesis processes: Energy, Economic and Environmental (3E) analysis

被引:10
作者
Shin, Beom-Ju [1 ]
Mun, Ji-Hun [1 ]
Devkota, Sijan [1 ]
Kim, Seung-Mo [1 ]
Kang, Tae-Ha [1 ]
Mazari, Shaukat Ali [1 ,2 ]
Cho, Kanghee [3 ]
Kim, Sun Hyung [3 ]
Chun, Dong-Hyuk [3 ]
Kim, Kyung-Min [4 ]
Yoon, Hyung Chul [3 ]
Moon, Jong-Ho [1 ]
机构
[1] Chungbuk Natl Univ, Dept Chem Engn, Cheongju 28644, Chungbuk, South Korea
[2] Dawood Univ Engn & Technol, Dept Chem Engn, Karachi, Pakistan
[3] Korea Inst Energy Res, 102 Gajeong Ro, Daejeon 305343, South Korea
[4] Gangneung Wonju Natl Univ, Dept Biochem Engn, Kangnung 25457, South Korea
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Blue ammonia; 3E analysis; Multi-objective optimization; Levelized cost of ammonia; Global warming potential; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; TECHNOECONOMIC ANALYSIS; SENSITIVITY-ANALYSIS; HYDROGEN-PRODUCTION; PLANT;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.05.205
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
A blue ammonia process was designed by incorporating the carbon capture and storage process into the gray ammonia process. A natural-gas-based ammonia synthesis process involved steam methane reforming, water gas shift reaction, acid gas removal, methanation, and ammonia synthesis. Energy analysis (specific energy consumption, SEC), economic analysis (levelized cost of ammonia, LCOA), and environmental analysis (global warming potential, GWP), denoted as 3E analysis, were executed for the gray and blue ammonia processes. Key process variables exhibiting a trade-off relationship for the 3E features were extracted via the local sensitivity analysis (LSA) and the global sensitivity analysis (GSA). Then, both processes were optimized by genetic algorithm (GA) based multi-objective optimization (MOO) technique for the 3E features, SEC, LCOA, and GWP. Three scenarios were selected on the Pareto front obtained through MOO, and the optimized results of the 3E analysis were compared. Through the MOO for 3E in the blue ammonia process, the minimum SEC, LCOA, and GWP were 31.03 GJ/tNH3, $415.15/tNH3, and 0.3172 tCO2eq/tNH3, respectively, compared to the gray ammonia process, +8.01%, +23.7%, and-81.47% increased or decreased.(c) 2023 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:35123 / 35138
页数:16
相关论文
共 53 条
  • [1] A.A. f.t.A.o. Science, 1924, Science, V59
  • [2] Abughazaleh J, 2002, Single train 4000 oe 5000 MTPD KBR ammonia plant
  • [3] High-efficiency power production from natural gas with carbon capture
    Adams, Thomas A., II
    Barton, Paul I.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES, 2010, 195 (07) : 1971 - 1983
  • [4] Multi-objective optimization of a sugarcane biorefinery for integrated ethanol and methanol production
    Albarelli, Juliana Q.
    Onorati, Sandro
    Caliandro, Priscilla
    Peduzzi, Emanuela
    Meireles, M. Angela A.
    Marechal, Francois
    Ensinas, Adriano V.
    [J]. ENERGY, 2017, 138 : 1281 - 1290
  • [5] Energy intensity and environmental impact metrics of the back-end separation of ethylene plant by thermodynamic analysis
    Alhajji M.
    Demirel Y.
    [J]. International Journal of Energy and Environmental Engineering, 2016, 7 (1) : 45 - 59
  • [6] ammonia BS energy association, 2020, About us
  • [7] [Anonymous], 2021, ASPEN plus 12.0
  • [8] [Anonymous], 2010, Assessment of Hydrogen Production with CO2 Capture, Volume 1: Baseline State-of-the-Art Plants, V1
  • [9] Appl M., 1997, 50 ANNIVERSARY IFA T
  • [10] Appl M, 2000, Ammonia, 2. production processes