Bayesian inference for optimal dynamic treatment regimes in practice

被引:2
作者
Duque, Daniel Rodriguez [1 ]
Moodie, Erica E. M. [1 ]
Stephens, David A. A. [2 ]
机构
[1] McGill Univ, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, Montreal, PQ H3A 1Y7, Canada
[2] McGill Univ, Dept Math & Stat, Montreal, PQ, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Bayesian inference; dynamic treatment regimes; precision medicine; R package; GLOBAL OPTIMIZATION; CAUSAL INFERENCE; DESIGN; MODELS;
D O I
10.1515/ijb-2022-0073
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
In this work, we examine recently developed methods for Bayesian inference of optimal dynamic treatment regimes (DTRs). DTRs are a set of treatment decision rules aimed at tailoring patient care to patient specific characteristics, thereby falling within the realm of precision medicine. In this field, researchers seek to tailor therapy with the intention of improving health outcomes; therefore, they are most interested in identifying optimal DTRs. Recent work has developed Bayesian methods for identifying optimal DTRs in a family indexed by ? via Bayesian dynamic marginal structural models (MSMs) (Rodriguez Duque D, Stephens DA, Moodie EEM, Klein MB. Semiparametric Bayesian inference for dynamic treatment regimes via dynamic regime marginal structural models. Biostatistics; 2022. (In Press)); we review the proposed estimation procedure and illustrate its use via the new BayesDTR R package. Although methods in Rodriguez Duque D, Stephens DA, Moodie EEM, Klein MB. (Semiparametric Bayesian inference for dynamic treatment regimes via dynamic regime marginal structural models. Biostatistics; 2022. (In Press)) can estimate optimal DTRs well, they may lead to biased estimators when the model for the expected outcome if everyone in a population were to follow a given treatment strategy, known as a value function, is misspecified or when a grid search for the optimum is employed. We describe recent work that uses a Gaussian process (GP) prior on the value function as a means to robustly identify optimal DTRs (Rodriguez Duque D, Stephens DA, Moodie EEM. Estimation of optimal dynamic treatment regimes using Gaussian processes; 2022. Available from: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2105.12259). We demonstrate how a GP approach may be implemented with the BayesDTR package and contrast it with other value-search approaches to identifying optimal DTRs. We use data from an HIV therapeutic trial in order to illustrate a standard analysis with these methods, using both the original observed trial data and an additional simulated component to showcase a longitudinal (two-stage DTR) analysis.
引用
收藏
页码:309 / 331
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Optimal Dynamic Regimes: Presenting a Case for Predictive Inference
    Arjas, Elja
    Saarela, Olli
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BIOSTATISTICS, 2010, 6 (02):
  • [2] Artman W., 2021, SMARTbayesR: Bayesian set of best dynamic treatment regimes and sample size in SMARTs for Binary Outcomes
  • [3] Moving towards best practice when using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) using the propensity score to estimate causal treatment effects in observational studies
    Austin, Peter C.
    Stuart, Elizabeth A.
    [J]. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2015, 34 (28) : 3661 - 3679
  • [4] When to Start Treatment? A Systematic Approach to the Comparison of Dynamic Regimes Using Observational Data
    Cain, Lauren E.
    Robins, James M.
    Lanoy, Emilie
    Logan, Roger
    Costagliola, Dominique
    Hernan, Miguel A.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BIOSTATISTICS, 2010, 6 (02)
  • [5] Chen Y., 2020, DTRlearn2: Statistical learning methods for optimizing dynamic treatment regimes
  • [6] Design and analysis of "Noisy" computer experiments
    Forrester, Alexander I. J.
    Keane, Andy J.
    Bressloff, Neil W.
    [J]. AIAA JOURNAL, 2006, 44 (10) : 2331 - 2339
  • [7] Frazier PI, 2016, SPRINGER SER MATER S, V225, P45, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-23871-5_3
  • [8] Freeman NL, 2022, ARXIV
  • [9] Ghosal S, 2017, CA ST PR MA, V44
  • [10] Approximate Bayesian Inference for Doubly Robust Estimation
    Graham, Daniel J.
    McCoy, Emma J.
    Stephens, David A.
    [J]. BAYESIAN ANALYSIS, 2016, 11 (01): : 47 - 69